Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

"Virginia Giuffre's lawyer says she is "pleased that Prince Andrew’s motion to dismiss has been denied, and that evidence will now be taken concerning her claims against him".

In a statement released a short while ago, David Boies adds that his client "looks forward to a judicial determination of the merits of those claims".
 
Essentially, she's saying that she was compelled to have sex with him against her will, by him, Epstein, and/or Maxwell, on a number of occasions, and that Andrew knew she was trafficked.
...and he's not the brightest light on the road Christmas tree, by all accounts....I'm sure he's very capable of suspending his disbelief. it could be difficult for the prosecution to prove he knew.
 
...and he's not the brightest light on the road Christmas tree, by all accounts....I'm sure he's very capable of suspending his disbelief. it could be difficult for the prosecution to prove he knew.
Yes, she's still got a lot to prove (albeit only on the balance of probabilities) to get home at trial. Won't be easy.
 
...and he's not the brightest light on the road Christmas tree, by all accounts....I'm sure he's very capable of suspending his disbelief. it could be difficult for the prosecution to prove he knew.
I would have thought that it was the height of bad manners, and indeed simply not done at all under any circumstances, to mention where any of the girls came from. They were simply there. The royal was used to such things (more things than people to him, no doubt) simply being there, presented to him as if they were his right.

If he were to admit to the sex but claim he didn't know about the trafficking, I'd be inclined to believe that bit could be true. He didn't know a) cos he's thick, b) cos he's an entitled twat who is used to being serviced, and c) cos, as you say, he didn't want to know, which was made easier by a) he's thick.

Morally, of course, that doesn't let him off. He fucking well should have known. But legally it might. The Albert Speer defence. (Speer was lying, though.)
 
Palm Springs is where she recruited, iirc

The documentary, Jeffrey Epstein Filthy Rich has a lot of information, much from Virginia Guiffre herself, about the timeline. But I won't pretend it's an easy watch, and it does contain trigger warnings.
 
He's blown this chance when he did the Panorama interview. He didn't say he didn't remember he explicitly stated there is no way it could have happened and listed several reasons as proof. He basically called her a liar on TV over and over again. I'm not sure coming out and saying oh that girl, I thought we were talking about someone else. Was she really under 18? will work at any level as mitigation.
Absurd as the 'no sweat' and pizza express defences were, I thought he must have something to back them up (doctored diary entries, verbal support from one of his flunkies, records from a dodgy doctor for the adrenaline thing etc). That he hasn't got any of is really quite astonishing. Well, it's not astonishing as it's not true, but astonishing in that he would say those things publicly. He genuinely thought this day would never come. Good.
 
Absurd as the 'no sweat' and pizza express defences were, I thought he must have something to back them up (doctored diary entries, verbal support from one of his flunkies, records from a dodgy doctor for the adrenaline thing etc). That he hasn't got any of is really quite astonishing. Well, it's not astonishing as it's not true, but astonishing in that he would say those things publicly. He genuinely thought this day would never come. Good.
He is exceptionally dim. He wouldn't survive any kind of court interrogation. They'll settle. They have no choice.
 
There is a much larger thing going on here then a court case. Even if the Panorama interview isn't admissible as evidence does anyone really believe they could mount the defence that he didn't know she was under 18?

How would that look after everyone in the country had seen the interview? He would be straight admitting that as a senior member of the royal family he told the country a total pack of lies.

The more I think about it the more I reckon this will never see the inside of a court room.
 
Absurd as the 'no sweat' and pizza express defences were, I thought he must have something to back them up (doctored diary entries, verbal support from one of his flunkies, records from a dodgy doctor for the adrenaline thing etc). That he hasn't got any of is really quite astonishing. Well, it's not astonishing as it's not true, but astonishing in that he would say those things publicly. He genuinely thought this day would never come. Good.
yeh it's this i think that will damn him. i would be rather surprised if he actually appears in the united states (i haven't been following with this with quite the assiduity it deserves, so maybe he's said he will). but it's the descent from 'i never met her and i can prove it' to 'you have to believe me i never met her' that will show the vacancy at the heart of his defence - that he's guilty as sin and has to mitigate rather than having the wherewithal to prove his innocence.
 
Absurd as the 'no sweat' and pizza express defences were, I thought he must have something to back them up (doctored diary entries, verbal support from one of his flunkies, records from a dodgy doctor for the adrenaline thing etc). That he hasn't got any of is really quite astonishing. Well, it's not astonishing as it's not true, but astonishing in that he would say those things publicly. He genuinely thought this day would never come. Good.

It’s because he’s stupid and his arrogance means he’s unwilling to listen to wiser heads.
 
He is exceptionally dim. He wouldn't survive any kind of court interrogation. They'll settle. They have no choice.

The thing about people who are exceptionally dim is that they have no idea, nor even the capacity to understand, exactly how dim they are.

I wouldn't trust his lawyers to provide sage counsel either. Not if they stand to make more money from a trial than from a settlement.
 
If you weren't fussed about the spelling you could start with some dough made from dried pea flour.
first catch a bed sheet and spray paint. make stencils of the slogan you wish to paint, then using masking tape attach to the sheet. secure the sheet outside and using the spray paint fill in the stencils. wait a minute, remove the stencils and allow to dry flat
 
Back
Top Bottom