cupid_stunt
Chief seagull hater & farmerbarleymow's nemesis.
Well, that news has cheered me up.
The New York Age of Consent is 17 years old.
I stand corrected.
yes, but they are funny about jury selection over there.Is that really a given? Wouldn't that be a matter for the judge to decide?
you can make such a sign now. best to have it made so you can display it the moment the nonce is found guilty.Someone wake me up when it's legal to make a big sign that says "Prince Andrew: definitely a nonce."
...and he's not the brightest light on the road Christmas tree, by all accounts....I'm sure he's very capable of suspending his disbelief. it could be difficult for the prosecution to prove he knew.Essentially, she's saying that she was compelled to have sex with him against her will, by him, Epstein, and/or Maxwell, on a number of occasions, and that Andrew knew she was trafficked.
it's civili litigation, so I suggest you add a footnote saying something about the balance of probabilitiesyou can make such a sign now. best to have it made so you can display it the moment the nonce is found guilty.
Guess Andrew is going to trial
Prince Andrew to face civil sex assault case after US ruling
Virginia Giuffre's claims against the Duke of York can continue to be heard, a US court says.www.bbc.co.uk
Good.
footnotes never look good on banners or postersit's civili litigation, so I suggest you add a footnote saying something about the balance of probabilities
goodHe's sweating now, reckon.
I think it's where the alleged dirty deed took place that's important. it's a lower age for federal trafficking charges, I think, and not dependent on the age of consent at point of departure or arrival.Where’s Palm Springs? Is that Florida? Because it could be argued that was where she was trafficked from.
Yes, she's still got a lot to prove (albeit only on the balance of probabilities) to get home at trial. Won't be easy....and he's not the brightest light on the road Christmas tree, by all accounts....I'm sure he's very capable of suspending his disbelief. it could be difficult for the prosecution to prove he knew.
fortunately the defendant is an arse who can be relied upon to make his sullied image look worse.Yes, she's still got a lot to prove (albeit only on the balance of probabilities) to get home at trial. Won't be easy.
I would have thought that it was the height of bad manners, and indeed simply not done at all under any circumstances, to mention where any of the girls came from. They were simply there. The royal was used to such things (more things than people to him, no doubt) simply being there, presented to him as if they were his right....and he's not the brightest light on the road Christmas tree, by all accounts....I'm sure he's very capable of suspending his disbelief. it could be difficult for the prosecution to prove he knew.
They might be allowed to play the interview for impeachment purposes if he makes an inconsistent statement under oath. I suspect that's why she's seeking more detail about some of his harder to believe claims.they won't be playing the interview at the trial...
Absurd as the 'no sweat' and pizza express defences were, I thought he must have something to back them up (doctored diary entries, verbal support from one of his flunkies, records from a dodgy doctor for the adrenaline thing etc). That he hasn't got any of is really quite astonishing. Well, it's not astonishing as it's not true, but astonishing in that he would say those things publicly. He genuinely thought this day would never come. Good.He's blown this chance when he did the Panorama interview. He didn't say he didn't remember he explicitly stated there is no way it could have happened and listed several reasons as proof. He basically called her a liar on TV over and over again. I'm not sure coming out and saying oh that girl, I thought we were talking about someone else. Was she really under 18? will work at any level as mitigation.
Yeah, but trafficking.The New York Age of Consent is 17 years old.
I stand corrected.
He is exceptionally dim. He wouldn't survive any kind of court interrogation. They'll settle. They have no choice.Absurd as the 'no sweat' and pizza express defences were, I thought he must have something to back them up (doctored diary entries, verbal support from one of his flunkies, records from a dodgy doctor for the adrenaline thing etc). That he hasn't got any of is really quite astonishing. Well, it's not astonishing as it's not true, but astonishing in that he would say those things publicly. He genuinely thought this day would never come. Good.
I'd start gathering the materials together right now.Someone wake me up when it's legal to make a big sign that says "Prince Andrew: definitely a nonce."
But you can only settle with someone who wants to settle.He is exceptionally dim. He wouldn't survive any kind of court interrogation. They'll settle. They have no choice.
yeh it's this i think that will damn him. i would be rather surprised if he actually appears in the united states (i haven't been following with this with quite the assiduity it deserves, so maybe he's said he will). but it's the descent from 'i never met her and i can prove it' to 'you have to believe me i never met her' that will show the vacancy at the heart of his defence - that he's guilty as sin and has to mitigate rather than having the wherewithal to prove his innocence.Absurd as the 'no sweat' and pizza express defences were, I thought he must have something to back them up (doctored diary entries, verbal support from one of his flunkies, records from a dodgy doctor for the adrenaline thing etc). That he hasn't got any of is really quite astonishing. Well, it's not astonishing as it's not true, but astonishing in that he would say those things publicly. He genuinely thought this day would never come. Good.
Absurd as the 'no sweat' and pizza express defences were, I thought he must have something to back them up (doctored diary entries, verbal support from one of his flunkies, records from a dodgy doctor for the adrenaline thing etc). That he hasn't got any of is really quite astonishing. Well, it's not astonishing as it's not true, but astonishing in that he would say those things publicly. He genuinely thought this day would never come. Good.
If you weren't fussed about the spelling you could start with some dough made from dried pea flour.I'd start gathering the materials together right now.
He is exceptionally dim. He wouldn't survive any kind of court interrogation. They'll settle. They have no choice.
first catch a bed sheet and spray paint. make stencils of the slogan you wish to paint, then using masking tape attach to the sheet. secure the sheet outside and using the spray paint fill in the stencils. wait a minute, remove the stencils and allow to dry flatIf you weren't fussed about the spelling you could start with some dough made from dried pea flour.
To be fair, his dad groomed his mum so it's hardly unexpected.Isn't there a baking competition for the Jubilee? Please can someone make a Royal your son's a paedo cake?