Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

The 61-year old "wants to clear his name" from accusations that he sexually abused Giuffre three times when she was only 17 years old. But he does not want to do so in court as he fears that a trial could cause irreparable damage to the reputation of the British monarchy.

As such, Prince Andrew is said to be looking to settle the case outside of court. This would mean putting out a hefty sum which sources claimed could go as high as £3million. Queen Elizabeth II will reportedly "not assist" with the settlement.


I'm curious about how paying her 3 million quid would clear his name tbh
Michael Jackson paid out multi millions to children who alleged he raped them. His fans got over this quick. But does Andrew have any fans bar Fergie?
 
He set out his stall. Now bribe me. (i'm a bit pissed).
Funnily enough it occurred to me that someone who was too honourable to drop a friend without doing it in person, too sweatless to misconduct himself in a nightclub, and too principled to admit to doing something he'd never done, would certainly never stoop to bribery. And that any member of the judiciary who found himself receiving unsolicited requests that could potentially cause a diplomatic incident might seek advice before proceeding to make any statement to that effect. So you must be wrong.
 
Today's Fail carries an interview Carolyn, one of the most persuasive witnesses in Maxwell's trial. She says Roberts texted her at the time that she had just slept with HWCS.
But she doesn't forgive Roberts for recruiting her. Giuffre's lawyer Boies was contacted for comment and pointed out that Roberts/Giuffre was only 17 herself at the time, and also a victim.

DM is keen to stress that Carolyn (who gives her full name) gave the interview for free because

'I'm not ashamed at being a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. For other girls that have been victimised, I want them to know that it is OK to come out and tell somebody – even if you don't want to be identified – and the sooner the better.

'I want people to know these terrible things have happened to me and that I am a survivor.

I want to let the other victims know, there's no timeframe on when you can talk about it, to get help. I'm very happy being a wife and a mother and I want to show people how the tragedies in my life did not stop me. I'm overcoming them. I'm not going to let Maxwell and Epstein ruin my life any more. I'm grateful every day when I wake up.'

So it's not looking so good for HWCS in terms of denying the encounter, or for Giuffre if you're one of those people who still reckon that teenage girls are incapable of being seduced, corrupted and coerced.
 
Today's Fail carries an interview Carolyn, one of the most persuasive witnesses in Maxwell's trial. She says Roberts texted her at the time that she had just slept with HWCS.
But she doesn't forgive Roberts for recruiting her. Giuffre's lawyer Boies was contacted for comment and pointed out that Roberts/Giuffre was only 17 herself at the time, and also a victim.

DM is keen to stress that Carolyn (who gives her full name) gave the interview for free because



So it's not looking so good for HWCS in terms of denying the encounter, or for Giuffre if you're one of those people who still reckon that teenage girls are incapable of being seduced, corrupted and coerced.

HWCS?
 
Today's Fail carries an interview Carolyn, one of the most persuasive witnesses in Maxwell's trial. She says Roberts texted her at the time that she had just slept with HWCS.
But she doesn't forgive Roberts for recruiting her. Giuffre's lawyer Boies was contacted for comment and pointed out that Roberts/Giuffre was only 17 herself at the time, and also a victim.

DM is keen to stress that Carolyn (who gives her full name) gave the interview for free because



So it's not looking so good for HWCS in terms of denying the encounter, or for Giuffre if you're one of those people who still reckon that teenage girls are incapable of being seduced, corrupted and coerced.
If it goes to trial, there'll be a battle to have that text admitted/excluded; defence will claim it's hearsay; plaintiff will say it's covered by an exemption.
 
If it goes to trial, there'll be a battle to have that text admitted/excluded; defence will claim it's hearsay; plaintiff will say it's covered by an exemption.
It'll just be hearsay anyway as I doubt very much she still has the text. But doesn't help anyone's shining sweatless image.
 
But was the duchess of argyle not up for it? I just never heard of anyone saying he was a rapist. Lots of other things though.
I believe the Duchess had a certain reputation that was used to vilify her and she was thoroughly slut shamed by society, even though her then husband was behaving in the same way if not worse plus the evidence suggests he only married her for her vast fortune. But he was a man so...

The Duchess never revealed the identity of the man in the photographs.
 
To be fair, the royals restrict themselves to one nonce per generation. Mountbatten already had the gig.
... though they are a bit more free and easy when it comes to their aides:
 
Back
Top Bottom