Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

I did not know that.

Sorry xenon for mentioning the spelling/typing errors, I should not have done that.

Lesson learnt.

Thank you Humberto

no problem.
And apologies if I’ve offended anyone by using the word retarded. But yes, I did mean it in the sense of holding back development. Not describing it to people or individuals. Clumsy though I admit that, I’m a bit pissed. The UK public largely are fucking dults / dolts though, I’m not apologising for that...
 
The UK High court have agreed to serve papers on him. He is fucked

Pretty extraordinary situation in itself to see the High Court siding against the 9th in line to the throne in a rape related case, even if it is about process. None of this gets him in a court or paying a penny in damages and my guess is that will remain the case (but we'll see). I do wonder though whether it emboldens the Met to do a proper investigation (aren't they 'reviewing' the criminal case?). There comes a point where he get's dropped by the establishment and the chance of him getting interviewed under caution in a criminal case start to increase. The Met won't want a situation where prima facia evidence of rape and trafficking is aired in an American civil court whilst they are seen to be doing nothing.

Well, actually, I think that's exactly what will happen. UK plod review the case, talk to the CPS, maybe talk to windsor's solicitors and then... nothing.
 
Pretty extraordinary situation in itself to see the High Court siding against the 9th in line to the throne in a rape related case, even if it is about process. None of this gets him in a court or paying a penny in damages and my guess is that will remain the case (but we'll see). I do wonder though whether it emboldens the Met to do a proper investigation (aren't they 'reviewing' the criminal case?). There comes a point where he get's dropped by the establishment and the chance of him getting interviewed under caution in a criminal case start to increase. The Met won't want a situation where prima facia evidence of rape and trafficking is aired in an American civil court whilst they are seen to be doing nothing.

Well, actually, I think that's exactly what will happen. UK plod review the case, talk to the CPS, maybe talk to windsor's solicitors and then... nothing.

We may see the poor man developing some debilitating - but easily faked - health condition. This could result in him having to relocate to the Cayman Islands, with selfless nurse Sarah in tow, to quietly retire from public life away from the baying media mob with their insolent accusations and questions.
 
The UK High court have agreed to serve papers on him. He is fucked


Trying to wriggle and sliver out of things on a technicality and now the High Court has had to step in. Each day it gets worse for him, hilariously so.
 
i haven’t read Marx but can still see the obscenity of such people being in such a position of power and yet still being venerated for it
What power does the Queen have though? sure she is wealthy enough to buy another racehorse but apart from being rich she only holds ceremonial power which is why she is tolerated.
 
trying to refute the claim on the basis of non delivery then having the HC step in to serve if needed. His lawyer surely did not propose this line, it must have been HRH nonce who demanded this. If not, his lawyer should be given the boot
 
What power does the Queen have though? sure she is wealthy enough to buy another racehorse but apart from being rich she only holds ceremonial power which is why she is tolerated.

Gough Whitman, Australian prime minister deposed by the Queen. A bit more than ceremonial…
 
trying to refute the claim on the basis of non delivery then having the HC step in to serve if needed. His lawyer surely did not propose this line, it must have been HRH nonce who demanded this. If not, his lawyer should be given the boot

Even if the papers are served, this is a civil case. If he just ignores the whole thing, what can the US court do?

Can they hold the case and award damages even if he doesn't go? (There is no way he is going to go.).
 
I hope when you become a magistrate, my case is heard by you. Killing someone through gross negligence is a wee bit more than a 'driving offence'.

There is death by careless driving and death by dangerous driving. That Yank would get a careless, doesn’t normally attract prison time, would certainly not should she ever find herself in a U.K. court.

Raping a child, that does normally see some porridge being dolled out.
 
Back
Top Bottom