What's that then?
And while we're at it, what is a Sherard?
see above. Something that is held back UK society. no idea, I meant cherade.
What's that then?
And while we're at it, what is a Sherard?
see above. Something that is held back UK society. no idea, I meant cherade.
He means charade.What is a cherade?
The shard?He mean charade.
The UK public largely are fucking dults / dolts though, I’m not apologising for that...
As a throwaway or drunken aside, fine. As a basis for any kind of social and political change, less so.The UK public largely are fucking dults / dolts though, I’m not apologising for that...
Pretty extraordinary situation in itself to see the High Court siding against the 9th in line to the throne in a rape related case, even if it is about process. None of this gets him in a court or paying a penny in damages and my guess is that will remain the case (but we'll see). I do wonder though whether it emboldens the Met to do a proper investigation (aren't they 'reviewing' the criminal case?). There comes a point where he get's dropped by the establishment and the chance of him getting interviewed under caution in a criminal case start to increase. The Met won't want a situation where prima facia evidence of rape and trafficking is aired in an American civil court whilst they are seen to be doing nothing.The UK High court have agreed to serve papers on him. He is fucked
High Court can 'proceed' with contacting Andrew over Virginia Giuffre's claims | ITV News
The High Court said Giuffre’s lawyers could proceed with the process of contacting the Duke of York about her civil action. | ITV National Newswww.itv.com
The clue's probably in the initialism.Well, actually, I think that's exactly what will happen. UK plod review the case, talk to the CPS, maybe talk to windsor's solicitors and then... nothing.
Pretty extraordinary situation in itself to see the High Court siding against the 9th in line to the throne in a rape related case, even if it is about process. None of this gets him in a court or paying a penny in damages and my guess is that will remain the case (but we'll see). I do wonder though whether it emboldens the Met to do a proper investigation (aren't they 'reviewing' the criminal case?). There comes a point where he get's dropped by the establishment and the chance of him getting interviewed under caution in a criminal case start to increase. The Met won't want a situation where prima facia evidence of rape and trafficking is aired in an American civil court whilst they are seen to be doing nothing.
Well, actually, I think that's exactly what will happen. UK plod review the case, talk to the CPS, maybe talk to windsor's solicitors and then... nothing.
The UK High court have agreed to serve papers on him. He is fucked
High Court can 'proceed' with contacting Andrew over Virginia Giuffre's claims | ITV News
The High Court said Giuffre’s lawyers could proceed with the process of contacting the Duke of York about her civil action. | ITV National Newswww.itv.com
What power does the Queen have though? sure she is wealthy enough to buy another racehorse but apart from being rich she only holds ceremonial power which is why she is tolerated.i haven’t read Marx but can still see the obscenity of such people being in such a position of power and yet still being venerated for it
She doesn't just have ceremonial power, as was discovered quite recently and reported in the Guardian. Her power is hushed up.What power does the Queen have though? sure she is wealthy enough to buy another racehorse but apart from being rich she only holds ceremonial power which is why she is tolerated.
How is sex trafficking noncery even remotely comparable to a driving offence?I'm in favour of quid pro quo, send us Anne Sacoolas, we send you Andrew.
How about instead of hanging the concept of justice for the victims and their families onto completely unrelated cases, we treat each case on its own merits and hand over his royal highnonce anyway?I'm in favour of quid pro quo, send us Anne Sacoolas, we send you Andrew.
have you seen how much land she has? wealth is powerWhat power does the Queen have though? sure she is wealthy enough to buy another racehorse but apart from being rich she only holds ceremonial power which is why she is tolerated.
How is sex trafficking noncery even remotely comparable to a driving offence?
What power does the Queen have though? sure she is wealthy enough to buy another racehorse but apart from being rich she only holds ceremonial power which is why she is tolerated.
By normal sentencing standards for causing death by dangerous driving she'd be unlucky to get a two-year ban.I hope when you become a magistrate, my case is heard by you. Killing someone through gross negligence is a wee bit more than a 'driving offence'.
trying to refute the claim on the basis of non delivery then having the HC step in to serve if needed. His lawyer surely did not propose this line, it must have been HRH nonce who demanded this. If not, his lawyer should be given the boot
I hope when you become a magistrate, my case is heard by you. Killing someone through gross negligence is a wee bit more than a 'driving offence'.
Gough Whitman, Australian prime minister deposed by the Queen. A bit more than ceremonial…