Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Prince Andrew, Duke of York, named in underage 'sex slave' lawsuit

Prince Andrew’s scandals left Queen’s monarchy ‘vulnerable’

Prince Andrew has come under fire for completely stripping the Queen of her power as a ‘protector’ after scandal broke loose.

The claim has been brought forward the CEO of Republic, Graham Smith. During his interview with the On the Republic podcast he claimed, “The monarchy has always been highly protected well up to the 80s.”

“I mean it still is to some extent, but not to a large one. So for most of the democratic modern era, the Queen's been there, protecting. It seems to me that it's incredible vulnerable because of the damage done by Andrew.”

“As well as the impact of their poor decisions in regards to Harry and Meghan. Certainly over the last 10 years, a number of times people have said they like the Queen, but can't stand the rest of them.”

“I'd be very rich if I had a pound for every time someone said that. It's not going to fall over just like that."

He concluded by saying, “If they're left to their own devices, they will fix a crisis and cover it up and move on. That's why it's about building the momentum to push it over when the time comes. I think it's going to be a lot easier to push over when the Queen's out of the way.”
 
Dystopiary said:
Prince Andrew’s scandals left Queen’s monarchy ‘vulnerable’

Prince Andrew has come under fire for completely stripping the Queen of her power as a ‘protector’ after scandal broke loose.

The claim has been brought forward the CEO of Republic, Graham Smith. During his interview with the On the Republic podcast he claimed, “The monarchy has always been highly protected well up to the 80s.”

“I mean it still is to some extent, but not to a large one. So for most of the democratic modern era, the Queen's been there, protecting. It seems to me that it's incredible vulnerable because of the damage done by Andrew.”

“As well as the impact of their poor decisions in regards to Harry and Meghan. Certainly over the last 10 years, a number of times people have said they like the Queen, but can't stand the rest of them.”

“I'd be very rich if I had a pound for every time someone said that. It's not going to fall over just like that."

He concluded by saying, “If they're left to their own devices, they will fix a crisis and cover it up and move on. That's why it's about building the momentum to push it over when the time comes. I think it's going to be a lot easier to push over when the Queen's out of the way.”
Click to expand...
The only reason Republic have been heard of by anyone is that they were the feeble liberal republicans the media found when the movement against the monarchy existed
 
Urban should pass the kitty round and buy up Zorro ranch for that 20 million failing pound sterling. We should fumigate it thoroughly, give it a thorough William Friedkin exorcism (filmed on camcorder by Republican Mark Kermode) and set up the Urban university there. I'll buy the first round in the subsidised student bar with my gold and Bitcoin. Pickman's model can have a special big bottle of Smirnoff the size of Lake Baikal for all those pamphlets he is writing.
 
Last edited:
An alleged victim of deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit against Prince Andrew of Britain on Monday, accusing the embattled 61-year-old royal of sexually abusing her at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion and elsewhere when she was under the age of 18, according to the complaint.
abcnews.go.com

Prince Andrew sued in federal court for alleged sexual abuse

The lawsuit comes almost two years to the day that Epstein died in a New York jail while he was awaiting trial on conspiracy and child sex trafficking charges.
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com
The lawsuit, filed by Virginia Roberts Giuffre in federal court in New York, comes almost two years to the day that Epstein died in a New York jail while he was awaiting trial on conspiracy and child sex trafficking charges. The legal action also comes just days before the expiration date of a New York state law that permits alleged victims of childhood sexual abuse to file civil claims that might otherwise be barred by statutes of limitations.
Click to expand...
Maybe we could do a perp swap
U.S. Won't Hand Over American Diplomat's Wife Wanted In Fatal U.K. Car Crash

Seems like a good deal
 
Last edited:
How does a civil case like that work, when it’s one person‘s word against another, 20 years after the event? I suppose it doesn’t have to be proven with physical evidence, it’ll just be a case of persuading a jury that it happened. Even so, i wonder what evidence or witnesses she can produce in a court, or will it get settled before it ever gets to court?
 
MrCurry said:
How does a civil case like that work, when it’s one person‘s word against another, 20 years after the event? I suppose it doesn’t have to be proven with physical evidence, it’ll just be a case of persuading a jury that it happened. Even so, i wonder what evidence or witnesses she can produce in a court, or will it get settled before it ever gets to court?
Click to expand...
she might have an 'accident' before then.
 
MrCurry said:
How does a civil case like that work, when it’s one person‘s word against another, 20 years after the event? I suppose it doesn’t have to be proven with physical evidence, it’ll just be a case of persuading a jury that it happened. Even so, i wonder what evidence or witnesses she can produce in a court, or will it get settled before it ever gets to court?
Click to expand...

Did you see his interview with Maitlis? There isn’t a jury in the world that would find in the sweaty nonce’s favour.
 
MrCurry said:
How does a civil case like that work, when it’s one person‘s word against another, 20 years after the event? I suppose it doesn’t have to be proven with physical evidence, it’ll just be a case of persuading a jury that it happened. Even so, i wonder what evidence or witnesses she can produce in a court, or will it get settled before it ever gets to court?
Click to expand...
Out of court settlement. Brenda won't allow the sweaty nonce to embarrass them any more than he already has.
 
Saul Goodman said:
Out of court settlement. Brenda won't allow the sweaty nonce to embarrass them any more than he already has.
Click to expand...
I think they will just ignore it, an out of court settlement will be seen by many as a tacit admission of guilt. He Who Cannot Sweat is going to have to stay out of the USA for the forseeable future but unless he has assets in the USA that can be seized then there is no actual penalty for a judgement against him. There's no possible way he is going to get extradited and trying to get a judgement in an US court enforced here is going to be both expensive and complicated.
 
MickiQ said:
I think they will just ignore it, an out of court settlement will be seen by many as a tacit admission of guilt. He Who Cannot Sweat is going to have to stay out of the USA for the forseeable future but unless he has assets in the USA that can be seized then there is no actual penalty for a judgement against him. There's no possible way he is going to get extradited and trying to get a judgement in an US court enforced here is going to be both expensive and complicated.
Click to expand...
ignoring it will be seen by many as a tacit admission of guilt
 
Pickman's model said:
ignoring it will be seen by many as a tacit admission of guilt
Click to expand...
To be honest the fact that he is still breathing is seen by most people (including me) as a tacit admission of guilt so he's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. I doubt it will get ignored in the sense of the 'grey men' of the Palace sticking their fingers in their ears and going "La La We Can't Hear You" but more a case of issuing a statement along the lines of "This case has no legal standing and HRH (Non) Sweaty denies all knowledge of these accusations" and then just ignoring it.
 
MickiQ said:
To be honest the fact that he is still breathing is seen by most people (including me) as a tacit admission of guilt so he's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. I doubt it will get ignored in the sense of the 'grey men' of the Palace sticking their fingers in their ears and going "La La We Can't Hear You" but more a case of issuing a statement along the lines of "This case has no legal standing and HRH (Non) Sweaty denies all knowledge of these accusations" and then just ignoring it.
Click to expand...
yes and it's that sort of ignoring it which will be taken by many as a tacit admission of guilt.

i don't remember is a very far cry from i didn't do it
 
Apparently any criminal case has to go first, and the investigators on that are still wanting to interview him, as part of their ongoing investigation, so this civil case is likely to be stayed, until the criminal case is concluded, whether it ends up in court or gets dropped.

Or, maybe just left open indefinitely, to stop the civil case in it's tracks, and avoid any embarrassment. :hmm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Humberto
British Empire and Slave Trade Reparations
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
155
Views
6K
shambler
shambler
tony.c
Major suspect named in Stephen Lawrence murder by BBC
Replies
23
Views
2K
Saul Goodman
Saul Goodman
Elpenor
Prince William’s many good deeds
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
176
Views
10K
Petcha
P
BristolEcho
Modern Slavery at TN Trawlers
Replies
5
Views
588
CNT36
C
friedaweed
Gwynedd council calls for abolition of title Prince of Wales
Replies
2
Views
412
Serene
Serene
Back
Top Bottom