Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Pop and Rock Stars... and underage girls

I'm not sure to be frank. Grown men having sex with kids is just wrong.
I agree. I don't think anyone disagrees. But should it not therefore be talked about? Leaving aside the grown men, because I'm not convinced there are nuances I want to discuss there, why can't this conversation be just as much - if not more so - about the kids swept up/left in the wake of all this? I would like to discuss their (my) agency, not shut it down because the men were wrong.
 
Last edited:
Do groupies exist to the same extent they did then after Savile etc? I have no idea tbh I don't follow this stuff at all.
 
Also the pop music industry is massively male dominated with only a few exceptions (Beyonce, Lady Gaga etc) I think someone uploaded a graphic showing what the reading festival would look like if it only included bands with at least one woman in them, hardly anyone. Could that have something to do with it?
 
Surely the pop-star media star pin-up was as much predicated on the sheer impossible distance between youngsters in their bedrooms and the objects of their adoration. A completely safe fantasy purely because of the sheer unlikelihood of real life interaction.
 
Also the pop music industry is massively male dominated with only a few exceptions (Beyonce, Lady Gaga etc) I think someone uploaded a graphic showing what the reading festival would look like if it only included bands with at least one woman in them, hardly anyone. Could that have something to do with it?
it's more to do with what boys are socialised to find attractive, I think. Power & success aren't really involved (in fact are negatives).
 
Also the pop music industry is massively male dominated with only a few exceptions (Beyonce, Lady Gaga etc) I think someone uploaded a graphic showing what the reading festival would look like if it only included bands with at least one woman in them, hardly anyone. Could that have something to do with it?
Dunno - I watched the Christmas TOTP and was struck by how many female artists were on plus teh kids are all talking about Adele, Jess Glynne, Fleur East, Selena Gomez etc
 
"The Evil One. SAY NOT HER NAME".
Indeed, though as we've mentioned the john peel thread she did call him out on his behaviour pretty much before anyone else. I'm sure it was part of her contraversialism, but she got it right in terms of both the behaviour itself and also the free pass he got in the media.
 
I agree. I don't think anyone disagrees. But should it not therefore be talked about? Leaving aside the grown men, because I'm not convinced there are nuances I want to discuss there, why can't this conversation be just as much - if not more so - about the kids swept up/left in the wake of all this? I would like to discuss their (my) agency, not shut it down because the men were wrong.
I have no wish to silence anyone. I think another thread that explores the choices (informed or not) that young girls make would be very useful. I don't deny the validity of these girls feelings either. If my daughter said when she was 13 that she loved and was in a relationship with an older man, I would not say she was silly etc but I would have stopped it from continuing.
 
To society.
Then it is a horribly reductive position.

If, by "to society", you mean "legally", then you cannot have paid any attention to poster after poster (including me) who has explained, clearly and patiently, why the mere question of legality is only a small part of the issue. And yet you haven't seen fit to challenge that argument beyond making bald statements like this.
 
Then it is a horribly reductive position.

If, by "to society", you mean "legally", then you cannot have paid any attention to poster after poster (including me) who has explained, clearly and patiently, why the mere question of legality is only a small part of the issue. And yet you haven't seen fit to challenge that argument beyond making bald statements like this.
Anyone having sex with someone without gaining their enthusiastic consent is a cunt of the highest order. Do you disagree?
 
I have no wish to silence anyone. I think another thread that explores the choices (informed or not) that young girls make would be very useful. I don't deny the validity of these girls feelings either. If my daughter said when she was 13 that she loved and was in a relationship with an older man, I would not say she was silly etc but I would have stopped it from continuing.
Why another thread? Why can't one that discusses men who were wrong also include the girls who were not wrong?* They're connected after all - i don't think one should be discussed without acknowledging the other in fact. Although I think I've run out of 2ps to spend :D

Doesn't mean I think another thread is a bad idea :hmm:

*I've put that really bluntly, but i hope people know what i mean.
 
Last edited:
Anyone having sex with someone without gaining their enthusiastic consent is a cunt of the highest order. Do you disagree?
what is 'enthusiastic' consent? What if its only keen consent, or even milder (but still consent)?

And regarding 'over-16s' - is that fine when its, say, a 50 year old and a 17 year old? Even tho, as we've affirmed throughout the thread, plenty of seventeen year olds are less mature than plenty of 15 year olds?
 
Anyone having sex with someone without gaining their enthusiastic consent is a cunt of the highest order. Do you disagree?
No, of course I don't disagree. But the debate has gone considerably further than that, and nobody's actually disagreeing with your ad nauseam restating of this fact.
 
I think that there is a male analogue - many adolescent boys would have had posters of particular female stars on their bedroom walls (or, if they were somewhat shyer *cough* just have carried a torch for one). I think there is a difference: it seems that we might well have quite deliberately chosen targets for our youthful obsessions that were even more unattainable than rock stars!

As a hetero teenager in 1963/4, the wall above my bed (i shared one room with two brothers) had pictures of the Beatles on it. Football didn't interest me, but the music of the 'fabfour' and other Merseysound stuff did. i might have had some 'pin up' pictures of women (ie, Dianna Rigg) had i not been fearful of the consequences from my dad.. i suppose sexual repression was quite widespread for my generation.

i've often thought that i am a bit of an oddity - some of the points made in this thread confirm it really. Oh well.
 
No, of course I don't disagree. But the debate has gone considerably further than that, and nobody's actually disagreeing with your ad nauseam restating of this fact.
Even that's not so straightforward. Bad sex in an ltr that may be in the process of going wrong - sad, empty sex - can involve less than enthusiastic consent from one or other party. Doesn't necessarily make people cunts of the highest order - just flawed human beings.
 
Even that's not so straightforward. Bad sex in an ltr that may be in the process of going wrong - sad, empty sex - can involve less than enthusiastic consent from one or other party. Doesn't necessarily make people cunts of the highest order - just flawed human beings.
yeh but that's not saying anything is it because we're all flawed.
 
As a hetero teenager in 1963/4, the wall above my bed (i shared one room with two brothers) had pictures of the Beatles on it. Football didn't interest me, but the music of the 'fabfour' and other Merseysound stuff did. i might have had some 'pin up' pictures of women (ie, Dianna Rigg) had i not been fearful of the consequences from my dad.. i suppose sexual repression was quite widespread for my generation.

i've often thought that i am a bit of an oddity - some of the points made in this thread confirm it really. Oh well.
I think I provided my own repression. Or, more likely, that any expression of sexuality might have prompted some prurient and embarrassing conversations from my mother :eek:

So I kept my passions very much to myself, too. I seem to recall having a bit of a thing for Cheryl Ladd, but, lacking a television, there wasn't a huge amount of scope to spot others :)

But, actually, in common (I suspect now, but didn't then) with a lot of teenage boys, I found the manifestations and practicalities of emergent sexuality confusing and (ahem :D) impenetrable - I always had the sense that it was a kind of game being played to rules everybody but me knew...
 
I think I provided my own repression. Or, more likely, that any expression of sexuality might have prompted some prurient and embarrassing conversations from my mother :eek:

So I kept my passions very much to myself, too. I seem to recall having a bit of a thing for Cheryl Ladd, but, lacking a television, there wasn't a huge amount of scope to spot others :)

But, actually, in common (I suspect now, but didn't then) with a lot of teenage boys, I found the manifestations and practicalities of emergent sexuality confusing and (ahem :D) impenetrable - I always had the sense that it was a kind of game being played to rules everybody but me knew...
i thought you'd be more a farrah fawcett man
 
Back
Top Bottom