Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Pop and Rock Stars... and underage girls

In the 70s, we read Jackie magazine and Mates - see below. The cover features Woody from the Bay City Rollers who was 19 in this photo. The magazine was aimed at school girls. Basically, the media very much encouraged girls under the age of consent to think it was absolutely fine to be in relationships (and have sex) with adults.

I don't think that would happen today.
It's not a million miles from how teeny pop groups singers are encouraged to hide any girlfriends to allow their fans to fantasize
 
Do you remember Billy? :D
no, when i was younger i was a big sex pistols fan and then got interested in the bands they went on to, which for glen matlock was rich kids, john lydon's pil and then the (to my mind) more interesting journeys of paul cook and steve jones: not to mention sid vicious's truncated career.
 
I was wondering similar last night. Not being a boy I don't know, but it seemed that at the age I was worshipping pop/rock stars my male peers were idolising heroes of their own sex. Lusting after famous women seemed to come much later, and wasn't the same kind of fantasy (as far as I could tell). Be interesting to hear some male perspectives :) eta: and indeed, male opinions of preteen girls going completely crackers over pop stars. At the time I mean, what did you make of it as a 12 year old boy?
I think that there is a male analogue - many adolescent boys would have had posters of particular female stars on their bedroom walls (or, if they were somewhat shyer *cough* just have carried a torch for one). I think there is a difference: it seems that we might well have quite deliberately chosen targets for our youthful obsessions that were even more unattainable than rock stars! I think that's probably true for most girls, too - I don't imagine that a very large proportion of girls with David Cassidy (or Justin Bieber :hmm:) posters on their walls would actually wish to end up having sex with them.

And, by the time boys have reached the same level of emotional maturity as girls (I've seen it suggested that boys might attain the level of emotional maturity girls exhibit at 14-15 by their very late teens or early 20s), they're significantly older, and less prone to having their naivete taken advantage of.

I can remember, as a fairly young person, seeing footage of girls at Beatles concerts - that classic shot of young teenage girls in Edna Everage glasses tearing at their hair, sobbing, and being carried, limp, from the auditorium - and being quite shocked and utterly perplexed by what was going on. Even as an adult, I find it difficult to relate to the kind of emotional state that was being demonstrated in that footage, but it's undeniable it went on, and still, perhaps to a slightly less intense level, does.
 
Some posters here who are not reticent in sticking the knife in over sexual politics are all of a sudden looking for nuance and making excuses for Bowie. This will bite them in the Arsenal.
I think that at least some of that "excuse-making" might be in reaction to the less nuanced views being expressed, although some (mainly female) posters have been very enlightening in their expression of the cognitive dissonance between holding a long-term admiration for Bowie and dealing with the notion of him as a sexual abuser.
 
The point being, you can't really talk about '13/14/15 year olds are like this/have reached this stage of development', because they really are all over the shop, some are still astoundingly childish, some are astoundingly grown up.
This is very true, although I think we can gently generalise to some extent, providing we keep it in mind that we are generalising, and can't then go back and apply our conclusions universally.
 
I think that there is a male analogue - many adolescent boys would have had posters of particular female stars on their bedroom walls (or, if they were somewhat shyer *cough* just have carried a torch for one). I think there is a difference: it seems that we might well have quite deliberately chosen targets for our youthful obsessions that were even more unattainable than rock stars! I think that's probably true for most girls, too - I don't imagine that a very large proportion of girls with David Cassidy (or Justin Bieber :hmm:) posters on their walls would actually wish to end up having sex with them.

And, by the time boys have reached the same level of emotional maturity as girls (I've seen it suggested that boys might attain the level of emotional maturity girls exhibit at 14-15 by their very late teens or early 20s), they're significantly older, and less prone to having their naivete taken advantage of.

I can remember, as a fairly young person, seeing footage of girls at Beatles concerts - that classic shot of young teenage girls in Edna Everage glasses tearing at their hair, sobbing, and being carried, limp, from the auditorium - and being quite shocked and utterly perplexed by what was going on. Even as an adult, I find it difficult to relate to the kind of emotional state that was being demonstrated in that footage, but it's undeniable it went on, and still, perhaps to a slightly less intense level, does.
I'm intrigued - did/do teenage boys feel jealousy towards famous men getting that level of admiration from teenage girls? Or does it heighten the boys' admiration for that celebrity?
 
I'm intrigued - did/do teenage boys feel jealousy towards famous men getting that level of admiration from teenage girls? Or does it heighten the boys' admiration for that celebrity?
That's a good question. Remembering for me, the pop/rock stars I was into, I didn't actually care either way whether they appealed to girls. If anything it might have put me off them.
 
I think that at least some of that "excuse-making" might be in reaction to the less nuanced views being expressed, although some (mainly female) posters have been very enlightening in their expression of the cognitive dissonance between holding a long-term admiration for Bowie and dealing with the notion of him as a sexual abuser.
Never seen much nuance expressed before with regard to these matters on Urban by either gender. The difference seems to be they liked his music so look for excuses in this instance.
 
If anything it might have put me off them.
I hadn't considered that, but yes. It's a perfect storm; there ought really to be more supervision of famous men. Time has proved that, although they should, on the whole they don't act responsibly towards underage girls and are surrounded by enablers (and cover-uppers) rather than ... monitors? Er, supervisors - people without that celebrity's best interests at heart.
 
My recollection of being a teenaged girl is that you were pretty much expected to have highly sexualised topless pictures of grown men blue tacked to your wall, that you'd pulled out of Smash Hits magazine or whatever.Don't know but get the impression that boys bedrooms weren't quite the same way in those days..
 
My recollection of being a teenaged girl is that you were pretty much expected to have highly sexualised topless pictures of grown men blue tacked to your wall, that you'd pulled out of Smash Hits magazine or whatever.Don't know but get the impression that boys bedrooms weren't quite the same way in those days..
there was the Kate Bush poster with her 'blowing little nipple kisses' (as she put it) which was very popular
 
Last edited:
Yes indeed. I wonder if the prevalence of underage girls having relationships with older men is in part because their male peers aren't ready to explore sex and relationships until later than girls are.
I think there's a good point here. If - as they tend to do - younger girls are tending to naturally find themselves attracted to older young men, then there is perhaps less of an impediment to extend that to significantly older men, particularly if they are charismatic and/or perceived as powerful or high-status.

Particularly as there is quite a lot of evidence to support the idea that female sexual attraction is, in part, driven by a desire to find partners who are "successful" by some standard relevant to the species in question (big colourful tail feathers, or a stage presence and lots of amplifiers :) ).

I'm not suggesting that we reduce the entire complex area of human sexual activity to such simplistic notions, but they will - and do - play their part, and in combination with other factors may well play out in ways which don't, at first sight, fit our preconceptions about the sexuality of young women (in this case).
 
Never seen much nuance expressed before with regard to these matters on Urban by either gender. The difference seems to be they liked his music so look for excuses in this instance.
I hope you're not sweeping up everyone participating in this discussion with the same brush. Cos I for one don't give a monkey's about Bowie's music. Isn't it good enough that there *is* a nuanced discussion happening now?
 
the shirley manson poster had very little to do with the musical quality of Garbage (although I'm not knocking them, they had some tunes). See also gwen stefani/no doubt
 
I had the occasional FHM style sexy women pinned up during the mid 90s. Baywatch era and all that. Seemed very normal among the nightclub/festival posters. By age 18 they'd come down (though I did keep a rather sultry looking PJ Harvey one up).
 
It is all very tricky isn't it. I, like pretty much everyone, am a product of my lived experiences and, my adolescence was a fucking train-crash. Mum had died, in care, rebellious and hateful teenager, drugs...fuck me, the whole miserable edifice...and unlike many young women, I do not look back on my sexual awakening with fond memories...because there was a bloody great gap from being 11. 12 and having all those fantasies (which frequently manifested themselves as girl on girl crushes) and the horrible reality of working a summer season in Torquay and being bullied into having sex by no end of predatory men.it certainly didn't involve long-term boyfriends of any age...Of course, my personal narrative was being a rebel, outside of the usual social constraints and so forth...but I was also scared, lonely and utterly desperate for intimacy and comfort. I have absolutely no problems in upholding the age of consent rules (although I agree, these ages are often arbitrary) because not all girls are ensconced in loving families and for sure, however much we tell ourselves we are in charge, we are not. Pfft, I am not talking about the usual phenomenon of having a boyf a few years older - that was a given precisely because young males were generally a bit slow on the uptake...but having exploitative sex with men who were in the late 20s, 30s and older. My partner's father, a man I personally loathed, had made a habit his entire life of selecting very young women to become involved with - the age differences were so much that my sweetheart's stepmother is younger than I am whilst his mother was a only a few years older than me. I find this very hard to understand and can only ascribe it to some sort of arrogant dominance thing (I suspect this much older man saw himself as a sage fatherly type...these women were his proteges, moulded and shaped by him alone... who also liked sex.
At the very least, I am clear that while the difference between childhood and adulthood are variable, it seems better to operate a safety first principle and continue to insist that young women and girls should have legal protection, particularly when the power equations are not just predicated on age alone.
 
Last edited:
When I was a teenager we all read stuff like Sugar and Bliss magazine. Remember nagging my mum to let me buy them. Yeah there was a race to lose your virginity as well.
 
At the very least, I am clear that while the difference between childhood and adulthood are variable, it seems better to operate a safety first principle and continue to insist that young women and girls should have legal protection, particularly when the power equations are not just predicated on age alone.
Indeed, and I agree that that last phrase is pretty much the crux of the matter.
 
There was huge pressure on teenage girls to have sex. I wasn't friends with any of the boys they all hung out with so don't know if it was the same for them. A lot of people were going out with guys in their 20s.
 
It is fair to say that I am 9 years older than my partner...who was a mere 21 when he got involved in my life - not really sure how these differences go when the gender differences are reversed. Not impressed with terms such as 'cougar' (sigh)
 
I'll try and be honest here.Growning up at primary school in the late fifties there was quite a bit of sexual experimentation going on,mainly of the "I'll show you mine if you show me yours" type of thing.Then at intermediate school (age ten and eleven) it got more advanced, touchy feely stuff,there wasn't much in the way of age difference involved.Then with high school at twelve (I didn't attend much so experience is limited), but there was a largish group of boys and girls who were having full sex.With leaving school at fifteen and going out into the real world (arf) the world of younger girls having sex with older boys suddenly appeared,as far as I'm aware it mostly came with in the three years age difference that is often seen as not exploititive and it was common.The starfucking thing appeared as well,working on a Disney show (down loading and moving out) showed me numerous girls trying to get off with the actors (bit of a mistake that they were nearly all gay),and a bit later with the cast of Hair and what not.
I guess what I'm saying is it not just pop stars who did this (although they have more power and "star" quality than most blokes and exploited it).
Saying this there was a lot of gruesome sexual exploitation going on particularly in the sub groups of bikies,the police (I'm ashamed to say I attended a couple of police parties and the way they treated young girls was disgusting) and the military (both kiwi ones and yanks who where pretty thick on the ground at that time).
 
21 is above the age of consent, I think above 16 it is about the maturity levels of the partners and age stops coming into it to the same extent.
 
Back
Top Bottom