LtV methodology varies between pollsters, and this is one factor that can lead to different polling numbers. In the case of the Ipsos-MORI poll they ask their sample to estimate how likely they are to vote on a numerical, (0 - 10), scale. Then, if they want to produce numbers that reflect the preferences of those "absolutely certain to vote" they restrict their analysis to those in the sample describing their likelyhood to vote as 10/10.brogdale : the 'certain to vote' number as a proportion of exactly what whole though?
Has anyone analysed that convincingly, because I'd struggle to even start .... </relies on wonkery >
That ComRes/SIndy 19% for UKIP is of some interest; Anthony @YG points out that ComRes are in a process of methodological change, moving towards consistent prompting of UKIP. The implication of the latest number (comparing like with like) is that UKIP are actually -5 on last month. Though, of course, this is only one poll...Labour poll lead grows to four points – but only 1 in 5 sees Miliband as PM
Level of support for Labour leader to head country falls but party’s predicted vote share remains strong despite infighting
Guardian..still all presidential.. just can't help themselves
http://www.theguardian.com/politics...d-grows-miliband-prime-minister-support-falls
also
Labour also ahead on Yougov:
Britain Elects @britainelects · 1m1 minute ago
National Opinion Poll (YouGov)
LAB - 33% (+1)
CON - 31% (-2)
UKIP - 18% (+3)
LDEM - 7% (-1)
GRN - 5% (-1)
On the face of it there is very little change from a month ago, the Conservatives are down one, Lib Dems up one. However, there is actually an important methodological change. As regular readers will remember, last month ComRes did a split sample experiment in their online poll, with half the sample being asked voting intention with UKIP in the main prompt, half not. This apparently made 5 points difference to UKIP, with the prompted half of the sample showing UKIP up on 24%. ComRes have now switched over to prompting for UKIP all the time in their online and telephone polls, but it obviously didn’t have the same dramatic effect in this month’s poll. I suppose comparing prompted-poll to prompted-poll UKIP are down 5 points since last month, but perhaps last month’s was an anomoly and the impact of prompting is just less than the split-sample experiment suggested.
ComRes’s press release suggests they have also tweaked their weightings this month. I’ll update with details once they are confirmed, but looking through the tables nothing jumps out at me so it is probably relatively minor.
National Opinion Poll (YouGov)
LAB - 33% (+1)
CON - 31% (-2)
UKIP - 18% (+3)
LDEM - 7% (-1)
GRN - 5% (-1)
Neither of them are 'stupid', but they both demonstrate psychopathy . Which one suffers the greater psychopathy/narcissism I'd not like to say.
Anyone who kicks themselves to the top of any organisation has more than a touch of psychopathy.
I'm surprised that no one is mentioning the SNP, who, God forbid, could be the power brokers if the Labour vote in Scotland does turn out to be as dismal as the polls predict.
What I hope is that those of us who voted NO! will support Labour and <spits> the Lib Dems. This next election will be more about who you don't want to win, than whom you do want to win. I will be voting and canvassing for Labour at the next Scottish elections, and voting for them next year in the GE.
I thought you were a Tory?
What I hope is that those of us who voted NO! will support Labour and <spits> the Lib Dems. This next election will be more about who you don't want to win, than whom you do want to win.
I would; very.Yes. I would not be surprised to see an informal Lib Dem / Labour agreement to this effect.
Orkney & Shetland is one constituency for Westminster. It's never ever been Labour since parties began.Shetlands, Orkneys, other Lib Dem strongholds. But I doubt it will go as far as asking voters to support the Lib Dems: I think it will be more of a lack of campaigning on behalf of their own candidates.
Shetlands, Orkneys, other Lib Dem strongholds. But I doubt it will go as far as asking voters to support the Lib Dems: I think it will be more of a lack of campaigning on behalf of their own candidates.
Orkney & Shetland is one constituency for Westminster. It's never ever been Labour since parties began.
There's no Lib Dem vote left to prop up outside the Orkneys and Shetlands
According to latest polling, yes reallyReally? Gordon, for instance, was a 4-way marginal. Berwickshire and West Aberdeenshire are LD / Tory marginals - better a LD than a Tory!
That hasn't stopped them trying. I think Mr Carmichael is pretty safe but with the increased political activity, why tempt fate?
What makes you think the tories will win that seat from 4th rather than the SNP or labour?Really? Gordon, for instance, was a 4-way marginal. Berwickshire and West Aberdeenshire are LD / Tory marginals - better a LD than a Tory!
Today's Ashcroft weekly National poll...vermin struggling to break out of the 20's, and the combined "big 2" total <60% for third week running.
Con 29%, Lab 30%, LD 9%, UKIP 16%, Greens 7% & SNP 4%.
What's 4% as MPs? about 26? The Scottish polling is showing SNP prospective number as 40. I wonder if sufficient weight is being given to the Scottish situation, because that is where Labour is most vulnerable. Fucking ironic, isn't it. If you had told me ten years ago that I would be voting for Labour in national elections, I would have said you were barking.
Yep, that's right.Yep, that's a whole UK figure. To have the SNP show up as a significant % of a UK wide poll means they're scoring some pretty impressive numbers in Scotland. As we knew already
Yep, that's a whole UK figure. To have the SNP show up as a significant % of a UK wide poll means they're scoring some pretty impressive numbers in Scotland. As we knew already
OK, so look at the Scotland specific polls with larger samples that back up this smaller numberI'm not sure that's the case. The SNP is a regional party (duh), and, per Q1, they only polled 88 people in Scotland, of whom only 62 were certain to vote. That's ~1 per (Westminster) constituency. I find it difficult to believe that that is a reasonable sample to make any prognostications about Scotland.
I'm not sure that's the case. The SNP is a regional party (duh), and, per Q1, they only polled 88 people in Scotland, of whom only 62 were certain to vote. That's ~1 per (Westminster) constituency. I find it difficult to believe that that is a reasonable sample to make any prognostications about Scotland.