Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Political polling

brogdale : the 'certain to vote' number as a proportion of exactly what whole though?

Has anyone analysed that convincingly, because I'd struggle to even start .... </relies on wonkery ;) >
LtV methodology varies between pollsters, and this is one factor that can lead to different polling numbers. In the case of the Ipsos-MORI poll they ask their sample to estimate how likely they are to vote on a numerical, (0 - 10), scale. Then, if they want to produce numbers that reflect the preferences of those "absolutely certain to vote" they restrict their analysis to those in the sample describing their likelyhood to vote as 10/10.

The %s relate to the particular column in which they fall, for instance that 30% Con in the first "Total" column is calculated by finding 247 (Con pref) as a % of 822 (Total voting) = 30%. Whereas, in the second ("Absolutely certain") column, the 32% Con derives from 178 as a % of 556 = 32%.

The overall "Total voting" figure is calculated by taking the overall total sample, (1011 people interviewed), minus those stating that they are "undecided", "would not vote", "refused" or "will vote for another party but don't know which". In the case of this poll those numbers were 1011 - 99, 79, 8 & 3 = 822.

83827bd8-96d3-4ea7-9283-2fc63a49bae5_zps6f533a63.png
 
Labour poll lead grows to four points – but only 1 in 5 sees Miliband as PM

Level of support for Labour leader to head country falls but party’s predicted vote share remains strong despite infighting


Guardian..still all presidential.. just can't help themselves

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...d-grows-miliband-prime-minister-support-falls



also


Labour also ahead on Yougov:


Britain Elects ‏@britainelects · 1m1 minute ago
National Opinion Poll (YouGov)
LAB - 33% (+1)
CON - 31% (-2)
UKIP - 18% (+3)
LDEM - 7% (-1)
GRN - 5% (-1)
 
Last edited:
Labour poll lead grows to four points – but only 1 in 5 sees Miliband as PM

Level of support for Labour leader to head country falls but party’s predicted vote share remains strong despite infighting


Guardian..still all presidential.. just can't help themselves

http://www.theguardian.com/politics...d-grows-miliband-prime-minister-support-falls



also


Labour also ahead on Yougov:


Britain Elects ‏@britainelects · 1m1 minute ago
National Opinion Poll (YouGov)
LAB - 33% (+1)
CON - 31% (-2)
UKIP - 18% (+3)
LDEM - 7% (-1)
GRN - 5% (-1)
That ComRes/SIndy 19% for UKIP is of some interest; Anthony @YG points out that ComRes are in a process of methodological change, moving towards consistent prompting of UKIP. The implication of the latest number (comparing like with like) is that UKIP are actually -5 on last month. Though, of course, this is only one poll...

On the face of it there is very little change from a month ago, the Conservatives are down one, Lib Dems up one. However, there is actually an important methodological change. As regular readers will remember, last month ComRes did a split sample experiment in their online poll, with half the sample being asked voting intention with UKIP in the main prompt, half not. This apparently made 5 points difference to UKIP, with the prompted half of the sample showing UKIP up on 24%. ComRes have now switched over to prompting for UKIP all the time in their online and telephone polls, but it obviously didn’t have the same dramatic effect in this month’s poll. I suppose comparing prompted-poll to prompted-poll UKIP are down 5 points since last month, but perhaps last month’s was an anomoly and the impact of prompting is just less than the split-sample experiment suggested.

ComRes’s press release suggests they have also tweaked their weightings this month. I’ll update with details once they are confirmed, but looking through the tables nothing jumps out at me so it is probably relatively minor.
 
National Opinion Poll (YouGov)
LAB - 33% (+1)
CON - 31% (-2)
UKIP - 18% (+3)
LDEM - 7% (-1)
GRN - 5% (-1)

The tables for that YG are still showing the following:-
  • Labour holding more of 2010 vote ("core"?) than tories; 77% >71%
  • LDs only retaining 27% 2010 vote
  • Labour gaining twice as much as tories from exLDs 30% > 15%
  • UKIP over twice a likely to gain ex-tories as ex-Lab 22% > 10%
  • Greens picking up 4 X as many from LD than Lab 12% > 3%
  • LDs still getting smashed in two age cohorts most affected by fees
  • Tories still reliant on the oldies living in the SE.(without them they'd struggle to be at 27%).
1ee8aa19-4302-4e78-bd66-79fdc1b94b42_zpsc0447627.png
 
Neither of them are 'stupid', but they both demonstrate psychopathy . Which one suffers the greater psychopathy/narcissism I'd not like to say.

Anyone who kicks themselves to the top of any organisation has more than a touch of psychopathy.

I'm surprised that no one is mentioning the SNP, who, God forbid, could be the power brokers if the Labour vote in Scotland does turn out to be as dismal as the polls predict.

What I hope is that those of us who voted NO! will support Labour and <spits> the Lib Dems. This next election will be more about who you don't want to win, than whom you do want to win. I will be voting and canvassing for Labour at the next Scottish elections, and voting for them next year in the GE.
 
Anyone who kicks themselves to the top of any organisation has more than a touch of psychopathy.

I'm surprised that no one is mentioning the SNP, who, God forbid, could be the power brokers if the Labour vote in Scotland does turn out to be as dismal as the polls predict.

What I hope is that those of us who voted NO! will support Labour and <spits> the Lib Dems. This next election will be more about who you don't want to win, than whom you do want to win. I will be voting and canvassing for Labour at the next Scottish elections, and voting for them next year in the GE.

I thought you were a Tory?
 
I thought you were a Tory?

You are some years behind the times. I was a Tory voter, however, the current government disgusts me. I would not consider voting Tory again ever (well, only when the current leading clique goes, and they will likely outlive me.) again.

I had been a Conservative supporter for 46 years.
 
What I hope is that those of us who voted NO! will support Labour and <spits> the Lib Dems. This next election will be more about who you don't want to win, than whom you do want to win.

Yes. I would not be surprised to see an informal Lib Dem / Labour agreement to this effect.
 
Shetlands, Orkneys, other Lib Dem strongholds. But I doubt it will go as far as asking voters to support the Lib Dems: I think it will be more of a lack of campaigning on behalf of their own candidates.
 
There's no Lib Dem vote left to prop up outside the Orkneys and Shetlands
 
Shetlands, Orkneys, other Lib Dem strongholds. But I doubt it will go as far as asking voters to support the Lib Dems: I think it will be more of a lack of campaigning on behalf of their own candidates.
Orkney & Shetland is one constituency for Westminster. It's never ever been Labour since parties began.
 
Shetlands, Orkneys, other Lib Dem strongholds. But I doubt it will go as far as asking voters to support the Lib Dems: I think it will be more of a lack of campaigning on behalf of their own candidates.

Not much an agreement then really is it? They already generally don't campaign strongly in areas they know they're never going to win. But this time and specifically in scottish seats they are going to do the exact opposite of what you say because of the wider disgust at lib-dems and the chance to make inroads on their traditional vote.
 
Orkney & Shetland is one constituency for Westminster. It's never ever been Labour since parties began.

That hasn't stopped them trying. I think Mr Carmichael is pretty safe but with the increased political activity, why tempt fate?

There's no Lib Dem vote left to prop up outside the Orkneys and Shetlands

Really? Gordon, for instance, was a 4-way marginal. Berwickshire and West Aberdeenshire are LD / Tory marginals - better a LD than a Tory!
 
That hasn't stopped them trying. I think Mr Carmichael is pretty safe but with the increased political activity, why tempt fate?

So let's get this right - you first argue that in these seats labour will do an informal deal with the lib-dems to not try too hard. Then you follow this up by arguing that they will try in these seats as they have done so in the past.
 
I sense a possibility for the Green share to increase slightly as their numbers get reported more widely
 
Today's Ashcroft weekly National poll...vermin struggling to break out of the 20's, and the combined "big 2" total <60% for third week running.

Con 29%, Lab 30%, LD 9%, UKIP 16%, Greens 7% & SNP 4%.

What's 4% as MPs? about 26? The Scottish polling is showing SNP prospective number as 40. I wonder if sufficient weight is being given to the Scottish situation, because that is where Labour is most vulnerable. Fucking ironic, isn't it. If you had told me ten years ago that I would be voting for Labour in national elections, I would have said you were barking. :D
 
What's 4% as MPs? about 26? The Scottish polling is showing SNP prospective number as 40. I wonder if sufficient weight is being given to the Scottish situation, because that is where Labour is most vulnerable. Fucking ironic, isn't it. If you had told me ten years ago that I would be voting for Labour in national elections, I would have said you were barking. :D

4% nationally. Not in scotland. ffs. They're only 8% of the state.
 
Yep, that's a whole UK figure. To have the SNP show up as a significant % of a UK wide poll means they're scoring some pretty impressive numbers in Scotland. As we knew already
 
Yep, that's a whole UK figure. To have the SNP show up as a significant % of a UK wide poll means they're scoring some pretty impressive numbers in Scotland. As we knew already
Yep, that's right.
 
Yep, that's a whole UK figure. To have the SNP show up as a significant % of a UK wide poll means they're scoring some pretty impressive numbers in Scotland. As we knew already

I'm not sure that's the case. The SNP is a regional party (duh), and, per Q1, they only polled 88 people in Scotland, of whom only 62 were certain to vote. That's ~1 per (Westminster) constituency. I find it difficult to believe that that is a reasonable sample to make any prognostications about Scotland.
 
I'm not sure that's the case. The SNP is a regional party (duh), and, per Q1, they only polled 88 people in Scotland, of whom only 62 were certain to vote. That's ~1 per (Westminster) constituency. I find it difficult to believe that that is a reasonable sample to make any prognostications about Scotland.
OK, so look at the Scotland specific polls with larger samples that back up this smaller number
 
I'm not sure that's the case. The SNP is a regional party (duh), and, per Q1, they only polled 88 people in Scotland, of whom only 62 were certain to vote. That's ~1 per (Westminster) constituency. I find it difficult to believe that that is a reasonable sample to make any prognostications about Scotland.

  • The total number of UK parliamentary electors in 2013 was 46,139,900, a fall of 0.5% from 2012.
  • On December 1, 2011:


  • So the Scottish electorate = 8.5% of total for UK parliamentary elections.
  • Recent polls have put SNP support between 40 & 50%.
  • Hence 4% of the UK polling.
  • Simples.
 
Back
Top Bottom