36% unassailable?I really don't see Aberdeen South going SNP.
36% unassailable?
c12% SNP last time but a hefty (c28%) Lib Dem vote which seems sure to collapse and go... somewhere. I wouldn't feel that comfortable if I were them36% unassailable?
Yep...ConDems = 50% in 2010...they won't get that again.c12% SNP last time but a hefty (c28%) Lib Dem vote which seems sure to collapse and go... somewhere. I wouldn't feel that comfortable if I were them
You seem to be in denial.Anne Begg seems to be a good MP and the SNP are nowhere.
You seem to be in denial.
She may well be highly regarded, I can quite believe that she is. But 36% of the vote is hardly a rock solid foundation on which to secure re-election in the context of what appears to be (from here in the West Country) the loss of significant sections of the Scottish Labour vote.
She may well be highly regarded, I can quite believe that she is. But 36% of the vote is hardly a rock solid foundation on which to secure re-election in the context of what appears to be (from here in the West Country) the loss of significant sections of the Scottish Labour vote. Even if she were to lose fewer votes than in other parts of Scotland due to personal popularity, she would appear to be vulnerable to the swing to the SNP from Lib Dem/Labour suggested by this recent poll
YouGov have two new polls out tonight – the regular GB poll for the Sun, plus a new Scottish poll for the Times. The regular GB (Westminster) poll has topline figures of:-
CON 33%, LAB 32%, LDEM 7%, UKIP 15%, GRN 7%, putting the Conservatives ahead by a margin.
Meanwhile the Scottish poll in the time has topline Westminster voting intentions of:-
CON 15%, LAB 27%, LDEM 4%, SNP 43%.
It isn’t as extreme as the Ipsos MORI poll we saw earlier today, but it’s still a very solid lead for the SNP in Scotland, and one that on a uniform swing would translate into the SNP getting a hefty majority of Scottish seats.
Watch the SNP join a tory-led coalition. Imagine the wailing, it'd be worse than the Lib Dem betrayal.
Maybe Cameron's decision to have a Scottish referendum wasn't so stupid after all, it's done them no harm.
In the 2010 general election, twice as many people voted Labour as SNP. A year later, in the elections to Holyrood, the SNP comfortably defeated Labour. Whenever YouGov asked Scots about the two kinds of elections, we found a large difference. Many voters wanted SNP to govern Scotland, but Labour to govern Britain.
Now the difference has almost completely disappeared. Labour has been swept aside by an SNP surge on both fronts. The SNP leads Labour by 16 points in general election voting (a massive 19 per cent swing since 2010), and by 18 points in Holyrood voting (a far more modest two per cent swing since 2011).
Labour must face the hard truth that it is suffering not a brief setback but a more fundamental loss of respect. Just 31 per cent of Scots who voted Labour in 2010 now think the party ‘represents the views and interests of Scotland today’ very or fairly well. Fully 59 per cent think the party does this job very or fairly badly. Those are truly terrible figures. If Labour can’t reverse them by next May, its prospects north of the border are bleak indeed.
Something bad for labour would be bad for labour. The think-tank strikes again.That's scary reading for Labour if the figures are maintained.
Nobody knows who he is.Poll figures like this might help Neil Findlay a bit? I speculate only ...
Nobody expects...hang on...who?Nobody knows who he is.
Nonsense; everyone in Tannochbrae knows him.Nobody knows who he is.
I used to play gigs there, and he was never in the audience.Nonsense; everyone in Tannochbrae knows him.
Home visits?I used to play gigs there, and he was never in the audience.
My gigs? No, in the Tannoch. And other local pubs.Home visits?