jannerboyuk
...just kids gone wild.
BBC Wales not a bad alternative, pundit wise at leastFuck, the BBC will be a hard watch with kuensberg and dandelion.
BBC Wales not a bad alternative, pundit wise at leastFuck, the BBC will be a hard watch with kuensberg and dandelion.
Hah! Autocorrect, Mandelson not Dandelion.Fuck, the BBC will be a hard watch with kuensberg and dandelion.
I thought that was your nickname for him and didn't want to ask why.Hah! Autocorrect, Mandelson not Dandelion.
Both make you want to piss the bed, perhapsHah! Autocorrect, Mandelson not Dandelion.
Or you want to blow them...Both make you want to piss the bed, perhaps
The exit poll is pretty much bang on the average of the MRPs isn’t it?Well either the exit poll or the preceding polls are wrong?
I haven’t seen an average of the MRPs, but I thought they were generally showing a lower number for Tory’s than 131The exit poll is pretty much bang on the average of the MRPs isn’t it?
I just checked and the average is around 105-110 seats for the Tories, so not too far out given the exit poll is showing about 120 seats as too close to call.I haven’t seen an average of the MRPs, but I thought they were generally showing a lower number for Tory’s than 131
I predicted tories on 111 (actually I put something else on the thread a bit higher actually, but later decided 111).I just checked and the average is around 105-110 seats for the Tories, so not too far out given the exit poll is showing about 120 seats as too close to call.
Yeah, don't think I can stand it.Fuck, the BBC will be a hard watch with kuensberg and dandelion.
Or you want to blow them...
Sorry.
I've blown lots of dandelion clocks.Did you mean to post that?
Quite proud of this predictionI reckon four of them will get in - Tice, Farage for certain, then maybe Anderson and the ex Southampton FC chairman Rupert Lowe who’s standing in Great Yarmouth I think.
Well, I was half right.Boston and Skegness or South Holland and The Deepings have a lot of Reform-adjacent Tories who may very well switch their allegiance if they fancy the candidate.
I'm thinking the polls are likely overestimating the Labour vote. People who say they are likely to vote Labour may very well just not on election day due to
1) a lack of enthusiasm for Starmer/Labour making Labour's vote soft
2) a reduced and demoralised activist base failing to get the vote out
3) that Starmer/Labour are bad at campaigning failing + playing it safe and thus failing to win over uncertain voters
4) complacency with respect to getting the Tories out.
There are other factors reducing the Labour vote of course such as disgust over Gaza, but that should already be reflected in the polls.
The complacency factor could be a real killer. People tell pollsters that they are likely to vote Labour and mean it, but come the day they might just not.
In my head when I see polls I subtract 5 points from Labour.
However, these factors are most likely to be in play in safe seats. And whereas the Labour vote maybe overestimated that vote will likely be more "efficient" than predicted. The Tories are still absolutely stuffed.
So now the starmerbots are in charge, how long do we reckon it'll take before labour are overtaken in the polls? And which party will overtake them?
Probably make more sense to start a new one for the next election (whenever it is)This thread needs to come out of the GE2024 forum now.
Probably make more sense to start a new one for the next election (whenever it is)
I meant to start a new polling thread now but for next election. But it's up to the mods if they move this and/or archive this forum.You absolute philistine. Political polling is interesting throughout the electoral cycle!
I meant to start a new polling thread now but for next election. But it's up to the mods if they move this and/or archive this forum.
VI ?There’s more to political polling than VI, though.
VI ?