danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Ah, OK. I was going to ask how I'm missing all these, but it's by not doing anything modern.There are loads of pro-Corbyn ads.
Ah, OK. I was going to ask how I'm missing all these, but it's by not doing anything modern.There are loads of pro-Corbyn ads.
I know I'm not the target audience for that phrase, but to me it sounds ace.Oh yeah worth saying that the tory MP was going on about 'the coalition of chaos with Jeremy Corbyn' and pretty much everyone was laughing at her.
probably renewed calls for el corbo to go though, maybe even YET ANOTHER leadership challenge- they'll spin anything other than a win as a disaster for him and his policies
They can call for what they like can't they - they can't win an internal election until they manage to stitch it up.
Do you drink your fifths or flat them? (Apologies for the jargony gag, but if there's anyone nerdy enough to get it we can do a virtual high five).
Yeah, the green guy was also brilliantly terrible at public speaking as well at one point it was his turn to answer an audience question and he said 'oh sorry I've got to go to the toilet' and another he gave an answer and then said 'oh dear I've bumped my nose on the microphone'
In trying to find out if deliberately watching their ad costs them money, which I haven't as yet, I did find this round-up of attack ads from the beeb. Given the spending brouhaha after the last election this is probably going to get quite a lot of analysis after the election. They make the point
I certainly haven't been targetted * but I'm not sure any individual can draw conclusions based only on their own experience. It's not what the BBC have reported
But i still don't know if deliberately seeking out the ads costs the tories money. I don't particularly want to make extra profit for Facebook or Google, but...
* but I have been wondering why something called BlightyTV has been popping up on Youtube. Turns out it's linked on the tory facebook main page. hmm.
the "Garden Tax" is now today's topic of conversation in the office this morning and not in a good way for Lab - Tories would do well to hammer that between now & election day
This the type of thing you want?Can't be arsed to trawl the thread, but is there a decent, in-depth explanation of polling methods and who uses what out there? and track record.
Never even heard of it.
New Ipsos MORI phone poll
CON 45% LAB 40%
Oh to be a fly on the wall in the tory HQ.
Yep, all models bar YouGov's show an increased Tory majority and BritainElects uses an running average of the last polls by each pollster so they have the Tories 9% ahead of Labour.This has Labour losing seats
Ohh wait, I suppose I was conflating 'voting intentions' (e.g. in IpsoMori above) with 'seats won'.Yep, all models bar YouGov's show an increased Tory majority and BritainElects uses an running average of the last polls by each pollster so they have the Tories up 9% in Labour.
I know I'm not the target audience for that phrase, but to me it sounds ace.
(possibly amongst other reasons) she called the election because her backbenches contained sufficient potential rebels to threaten her stability and make her look weak. If she fails to gain a clear personal mandate by substantially increasing her majority she's toast and they're into trench warfare. Which will be fun to watch if nothing elseI don't think so - for her personally a gain of one seat would be a disaster. Obviously she'd still be PM in the short term but her standing would be destroyed, and the other Tories who fancy the job would be getting into line.
(possibly amongst other reasons) she called the election because her backbenches contained sufficient potential rebels to threaten her stability and make her look weak. If she fails to gain a clear personal mandate by substantially increasing her majority she's toast and they're into trench warfare. Which will be fun to watch if nothing else
the "Garden Tax" is now today's topic of conversation in the office this morning and not in a good way for Lab - Tories would do well to hammer that between now & election day
Absolute majority of 17 at dissolution. She needs an increased majority measured by the dozen to make her position secure.Even staying on the same number of seats would be shit for them. They were expecting a landslide. Isn't the majority at the moment about 6?