littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
I'm almost at the point of believing that the real picture might be to the left of the yougov figures.
I need to stop doing this.
I need to stop doing this.
I think the concept on inter-generational inequality has been building slowly but it is seeping through to everyone now. 2010 was all about tuition fees which was only ever going to effect a limited number of younger voters.
Indeed, and if anything has done that its the Tory social care policy. I'd guess most people who thought that they and their family were alright did so because they had got on the housing ladder early enough and owned their own home; threaten it (which is explicitly what that policy does, and if anything the u-turn since makes it even more obvious) and you suddenly expose them to everything that has been going on housing, with workplace terms and conditions and the rest of it.
urbs - I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability - but I have a bad feeling that hope will be cruelly dashed
I'm almost at the point of believing that the real picture might be to the left of the yougov figures.
I need to stop doing this.
. And/or, at the older end of the spectrum, people would need to be less enthused by May than they were by Cameron. Surely neither of those things is possible?
If YouGov's model implies a demographic split in the turnout similar to 2010, then for their figures to underestimate the Labour vote, one of two things would need to happen. Either Corbyn would need to have a greater appeal at the younger end of the spectrum than Nick Clegg did. And/or, at the older end of the spectrum, people would need to be less enthused by May than they were by Cameron. Surely neither of those things is possible?
That seems quite likely no? Given the whole dementia tax thing, that can't have played well with older people.
Dunno. Cameron pissed a lot of die hard tories off because they thought he was a phony, hence in part the rise of UKIP during his tenure.
I've just looked up youth turnout, and it has plummetted since 1992, recovering somewhat in 2010. But if Corbyn can get an equal turnout to Blair in 97, which itself was way down on 92, he will be doing better than Clegg in 2010. I think this is very possible, given that the UK has recently been a massive outlier among countries around the world regarding youth no-shows. A rise back to 50-odd % might be better thought of as a reversion to the mean following the exceptional circumstances that were the years of disillusionment during the New Labour Iraq War years.If YouGov's model implies a demographic split in the turnout similar to 2010, then for their figures to underestimate the Labour vote, one of two things would need to happen. Either Corbyn would need to have a greater appeal at the younger end of the spectrum than Nick Clegg did. And/or, at the older end of the spectrum, people would need to be less enthused by May than they were by Cameron. Surely neither of those things is possible?
That bit's already accounted for in the polls, though. It's one of the reasons why the tories still have a lead despite being a shower of hopeless cunts.That seems quite likely no? Given the whole dementia tax thing, that can't have played well with older people.
Dunno. Cameron pissed a lot of die hard tories off because they thought he was a phony, hence in part the rise of UKIP during his tenure.
Sorry, my response to monkeygrinder was really to you. That's already accounted for in the polls. It's the reason for the tory lead currently.This is a fair point, actually. They would have still voted, but they would have voted for UKIP. So the question is really whether they are likely to be more or less enthused by May/Nuttall compared to Cameron/Farage.
Sorry, my response to monkeygrinder was really to you. That's already accounted for in the polls. It's the reason for the tory lead currently.
When maiden aunts bicycling to evensong turn Corbyn, the red flag will fly over the Palace of Westminster.A family member today was visiting a market town in a safe Tory seat today with a population that is disproportionately quite old. She said that Tory MPs were campaigning there and were met with a combination of total disinterest and a bit of hostility. Not claiming that this is representative or anything but interesting perhaps!
You were indicating factors that suggest what I said can't happen. But any comparison of May to Cameron is already in the polls. If anything, that's also getting worse by the day. Also, Cameron was up against a pretty woeful Brown.Sorry, what's the reason for the Tory lead?
YouGov Wales one (29-31 May 2017)
Labour: 46%
Conservatives: 35%
Plaid Cymru: 8%
Liberal Democrats: 5%
Ukip: 5%
Which they project in terms of seat changes (using what method I've no idea)
Labour: 27 seats (+2)
Conservatives: 9 seats (-2)
Plaid Cymru: 3 seats (no change)
Liberal Democrats: 1 seat (no change)
Apparently the two they are predicting to change hands are Gower and the Vale of ClwydI would fucking love it, in a Kevin Keegan style, if they lost Cardiff North and Cardiff went entirely red.
Gower must be a certainty to go back to Labour.
Must. Not. Get. Heady.
You were indicating factors that suggest what I said can't happen. But any comparison of May to Cameron is already in the polls. If anything, that's also getting worse by the day. Also, Cameron was up against a pretty woeful Brown.
Not really. I was simply concentrating on the measures polling companies have taken post-2015 to correct for past errors. Those measures are made purely on stats, not accounting for reasons (such as, for instance, disillusionment with the entire system caused by the Iraq war) - not asking any 'why' questions. Even the yougov bloke acknowledges this in part when he wonders how much Corbyn might enthuse young voters.You're thinking in terms of whether older Tories will switch. But the issue is that more of them may stop in that the pollsters are prediciting. I'm not saying this will happen, but if it did, it would make their models too skewed to the Tories.
Not really. I was simply concentrating on the measures polling companies have taken post-2015 to correct for past errors. Those measures are made purely on stats, not accounting for reasons (such as, for instance, disillusionment with the entire system caused by the Iraq war) - not asking any 'why' questions. Even the yougov bloke acknowledges this in part when he wonders how much Corbyn might enthuse young voters.
The most striking thing to me about the various things I've linked to has been the variation from other countries regarding the youth vote in the UK over the last 20 years. I suspect that the reasons for this are largely to do with the Iraq war and New Labourism. Those reasons are finally gone, so that is a prediction based on the polls plus that hypothesis.What's that? A model or just your prediction/hope?