Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Political Compass 2015

I took the test yesterday and came out Libertarian Left. Where in Europe am I supposed to go?

I did something like this before the last euro elections. since i didn't tick / untick whatever it was to say UK parties, I ended up with a fairly close match with the catalan socialist party...
 
it means this party used to have some social democratic policies, but have abandoned them completely.
I don't actually believe this - they have some reasonably social democratic policies - eg. the mansion tax. It doesn't go especially far, but it's a start.
 
I don't actually believe this - they have some reasonably social democratic policies - eg. the mansion tax. It doesn't go especially far, but it's a start.
It's about the trend of their programme as a whole, though. Anyone can pick one or two instances from a big picture without them being representative of it.

Like, "there's no racism in America because the president is African American", Or "there's no class bias in government because John Prescott went to a state comp" and so on.

The mansion tax will frankly fix fuck all.
 
The policies of the party leadership - I don't advocate "social democratic adaptations to neoliberalism", but I recognise this is where the leadership of the party currently stands
 
The policies of the party leadership - I don't advocate "social democratic adaptations to neoliberalism", but I recognise this is where the leadership of the party currently stands
Working to get the party leadership into power is the same as working to put their programme into effect.
 
Working to get the party leadership into power is the same as working to put their programme into effect.
there's every chance that even a small grouping of socialists in Parliament could work with others to shift that programme significantly to the left, if Labour falls short of a working majority
 
Is anyone actually defending the argument that the Labour party is to the right of the BNP, even on economics?
 
Because you know damn well that currently extends pretty much forever. It's at best a fantastical currently, at worst a downright dishonest currently.
 
Because you know damn well that currently extends pretty much forever. It's at best a fantastical currently, at worst a downright dishonest currently.
not necessarily, the Progress wing are pretty much advocates of the neoliberal destruction of the social democratic legacy, a quite different prospect.
 
Do we really need yet another Political fucking Compass thread....?
Yes, go start one.
there's every chance that even a small grouping of socialists in Parliament could work with others to shift that programme significantly to the left, if Labour falls short of a working majority
What would you call significantly? Where has this strategy worked before?
 
What would you call significantly? Where has this strategy worked before?

Significantly - abandoning year-on-year cuts to the current account deficit, commitment to Trident replacement, stopping cuts to welfare. I'm not saying this will happen [will also depend on the leaderships of the Nats], but there's some scope for it at least.
 
Significantly - abandoning year-on-year cuts to the current account deficit, commitment to Trident replacement, stopping cuts to welfare. I'm not saying this will happen [will also depend on the leaderships of the Nats], but there's some scope for it at least.
So has it ever worked anywhere before? Perhaps you should join the "Nats" and try to influence their leadership.
 
Is anyone actually defending the argument that the Labour party is to the right of the BNP, even on economics?

if the left/right axis is based on collectivism vs private ownership then yes they are, that that collectivism means an authoritarian state is the reason for the other axis. I can't believe I'm defending political fucking compass.
 
if the left/right axis is based on collectivism vs private ownership then yes they are, that that collectivism means an authoritarian state is the reason for the other axis. I can't believe I'm defending political fucking compass.
so turning the world into a gigantic labour camp would be "left wing"?
 
^ just shows how flawed the whole concept is when elements of fascistic state ownership are somehow seen as "to the left" of social democratic adaptations to neoliberalism.

Surely "social democratic adaptations to neoliberalism" transgress most of the principles of social democracy? Such "adaptations" being, in fact, capitulation to neoliberalism, dressed up so that it can be sold as something it isn't.
 
not necessarily, the Progress wing are pretty much advocates of the neoliberal destruction of the social democratic legacy, a quite different prospect.
Fantasy. You don't even know your own party - or more accurately you do, but can't face the truth, what it would mean for a good Communist like you.
 
so turning the world into a gigantic labour camp would be "left wing"?

your toy town politics is showing again, you think right wing means nasty, like Tories, Hitler and Darth Vadar and left wing means nice like kittens and hippies and the Labour party and you. the truth is a little more complex, especially in terms of economic policies (you, hippies and the Labour Party are all economically to the right of Darth Vadar)
 
Surely "social democratic adaptations to neoliberalism" transgress most of the principles of social democracy? Such "adaptations" being, in fact, capitulation to neoliberalism, dressed up so that it can be sold as something it isn't.
I think Miliband genuinely wants to protect what's left of the social democratic legacy, but believes it's impossible to do anything that fundamentally challenges the financial markets, so ends up making adaptations. Someone like Milburn actively wants to break up the welfare state/public services etc to run them along market lines.
 
your toy town politics is showing again, you think right wing means nasty, like Tories, Hitler and Darth Vadar and left wing means nice like kittens and hippies and the Labour party and you. the truth is a little more complex, especially in terms of economic policies (you, hippies and the Labour Party are all economically to the right of Darth Vadar)
No, I'm fully aware of Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot thank you very much
 
Fantasy. You don't even know your own party - or more accurately you do, but can't face the truth, what it would mean for a good Communist like you.

Assuming my scenario of the nats and labour left pulling the programme to the left fails - (especially if it doesn't even get the chance owing to Labour failing to be the largest party) - there will be major battles ahead and the question of a left break from the party will be posed.
 
your toy town politics is showing again, you think right wing means nasty, like Tories, Hitler and Darth Vadar and left wing means nice like kittens and hippies and the Labour party and you. the truth is a little more complex, especially in terms of economic policies (you, hippies and the Labour Party are all economically to the right of Darth Vadar)
...but I don't see how state control of production to fight for global imperial domination and racial supremacy can be classified as "left wing" - it's a daft categorisation.
 
Back
Top Bottom