electoral success is one metric, but also building a platform likely to attract significant new layers of support, building credibility in local communities, building support for direct action, etc.
some (a minority of course but still) of the new candidates are less likely to be lobby fodder, and a minority government could see a group of 20-30 left MPs have some influence...
...and we're back in the room.
removing prescription charges, introducing free personal care for the elderly, scrapping tuition fees, revoking Right To Buy...in their manifesto, yes. But in their role in Holyrood much less so - cutting corporation tax, putting public services out to tender, implementing cuts...
err wasn't it the Lab/Lib coalition that avoided introducing student fees in Scotland?removing prescription charges, introducing free personal care for the elderly, scrapping tuition fees, revoking Right To Buy...
Dewar scrapped tuition fees but replaced them with a Graduate Endowment Tax which is just a delayed tuition fee, SNP got rid of that returning properly free university education.err wasn't it the Lab/Lib coalition that avoided introducing student fees in Scotland?
I'm not convinced anyone has dragged things "to the left" outside of Scotland... And even then it seems (to this outsider) that the business oriented SNP have been dragged left by the electorate - something that will not happen in England where it is UKIP who are the high profile insurgents...
These are both important points.I would not make the mistake of confusing parties rhetoric with what they actually do with power. But I still appreciated hearing anti-austerity, explicit anti-'there is no alternative' rhetoric.
I think Miliband genuinely wants to protect what's left of the social democratic legacy, but believes it's impossible to do anything that fundamentally challenges the financial markets, so ends up making adaptations. Someone like Milburn actively wants to break up the welfare state/public services etc to run them along market lines.
you don't think they see themselves as a master race, with all that implies for non-aryan populations?
yes, although they spent a while trying to persuade people otherwise
What feasible scenario do you see at the moment, that's keeping you there?
I think that you're confusing the British National Party (hard-right/New Right/neo-fascist) with the NSDAP. Best not to make the juvenile HnH/UAF error of conflating a minority of twats with a regime of murderous zealots.
the way to get on in that sense is hardly associated with supporting the hard left!Himself as a senior mover and shaker?
oh do give over, you were talking shit and you got pulled on it.I wasn't comparing their capacity, but the source of many of their ideological influences
He (and his ilk) genuinely think that challenging neoliberalism would mean total economic and social apocalypse - a market meltdown and society grinding to a halt.So Miliband has these beliefs, but isn't willing to risk his political arse to uphold those beliefs.
And you still think people should "vote Labour with no illusions"?
we were talking about their ideas on economics not their capacity to implement themoh do give over, you were talking shit and you got pulled on it.
for the hard of thinking YOU WERE TALKING SHIT AND GOT PULLED ON ITwe were talking about their ideas on economics not their capacity to implement them
he doesn't care about the illusions as long as they vote labourSo Miliband has these beliefs, but isn't willing to risk his political arse to uphold those beliefs.
And you still think people should "vote Labour with no illusions"?
like a blue peter appeal but without the appealMust've been Socialist Appeal.