Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Political Compass 2015

Of course they wouldn't publish public documents about aryan supremacy - but its clearly part of the ideological basis of their movement (just as there's a socialist legacy that's still actively present in the Labour party even though it's not often publicly avowed :p)

The ideological basis of the BNP isn't based in "Aryan" supremacism, it's based in white supremacism and Euro-nationalism. The white supremacism doesn't mark a desire to liquidate non-whites, but a desire for separatism. They're cunts, but they're not Nazis, and don't draw their "separate but equal" ideology from Nazism.
Aren't you supposed to be well-educated? This is political ideology one-oh-fucking-one!
 
The ideological basis of the BNP isn't based in "Aryan" supremacism, it's based in white supremacism and Euro-nationalism. The white supremacism doesn't mark a desire to liquidate non-whites, but a desire for separatism. They're cunts, but they're not Nazis, and don't draw their "separate but equal" ideology from Nazism.
Aren't you supposed to be well-educated? This is political ideology one-oh-fucking-one!
you don't think an element would quite happily liquidate Jews?
 
I don't see how - only if you believe a somewhat neoliberalised version of social democracy is to the right of a ethnically exclusivist nationalistic/fascistic control of production.

There is no "somewhat neoliberalised version of social democracy". All there is, is neoliberalism over-written with a thin veneer of ameliorationism. Most of the policies that made post-war Britain a social democracy have been resiled from or eroded by the state. Most of the artifacts of social democracy are being dismantled and handed over to the corporations.
You're living in a circle-jerking fantasy land.
 
it's an example - it's not neoliberal to tax wealth, it's social democratic

You appear to have a poor understanding of neoliberalism and those who facilitate it. The "Mansion Tax", for all the Commentariat have windbagged about it, isn't a threat to neoliberalism, so of course it's allowed to be considered - it barely causes a ripple in the pond of wealth.
 
I'm saying that what a Miliband government would set out to achieve was to adapt social democratic institutions (to the extent that they still exist - like the NHS), to a wider neoliberal framework *rather than* see them "dismantled and handed over" at quite the same rate. Of course this is not sufficient, and generally entails further attacks. But it's not the same as an outright promotion of neoliberalism for its own sake.
 
you don't think an element would quite happily liquidate Jews?

I'm sure an element would. Are you claiming that such an element is dominant? Because that's the only way your "Nazi" claims stand up. Otherwise, the BNP are no different to the Conservative Party in being right-wing and including a minority of anti-Semitic cuntrags.
 
and we are meant to believe that's an entirely contingent circumstance, unrelated to his membership of the organisation?

No, we're meant to not make assumptions based primarily on our preconceptions and prejudices. Prove your claim and we might get somewhere, otherwise you're just singing the SWP/UAF "BNP are Nazis" song that makes so many non-aligned (to the SWP/UAF) anti-fascists roll their eyes.
 
I'm saying that what a Miliband government would set out to achieve was to adapt social democratic institutions (to the extent that they still exist - like the NHS), to a wider neoliberal framework *rather than* see them "dismantled and handed over" at quite the same rate. Of course this is not sufficient, and generally entails further attacks. But it's not the same as an outright promotion of neoliberalism for its own sake.

It's worse, because it gives people false hope of a new dawn, then sneaks neoliberalism in anyway. That you can't see that tells me that you either have the political nous of a dead cat, or are as politically-amoral as Tony Blair.
 
No, we're meant to not make assumptions based primarily on our preconceptions and prejudices. Prove your claim and we might get somewhere, otherwise you're just singing the SWP/UAF "BNP are Nazis" song that makes so many non-aligned (to the SWP/UAF) anti-fascists roll their eyes.
The question of Aryan vs White Supremacy is not germane to the point I was making, namely that the fascist state control of production cannot be considered "to the left" of pro-free market/private property neoliberals. They are not opposites.
 
The question of Aryan vs White Supremacy is not germane to the point I was making, namely that the fascist state control of production cannot be considered "to the left" of pro-free market/private property neoliberals. They are not opposites.

Why can't it be considered "to the left"? Is corporatist quasi-democratic control a la Italy more "right-wing" than the combination of "oligarchy and robber-baronage with a dab of amelioration" that we've got. Look beyond your own narrow definitions of "left" and "right", and stop kidding yourself that it's all as simple as you like to make out.
 
It's worse, because it gives people false hope of a new dawn, then sneaks neoliberalism in anyway. That you can't see that tells me that you either have the political nous of a dead cat, or are as politically-amoral as Tony Blair.
This is a silly argument - the same one that said the creation of the welfare state/NHS were damaging because it reconciled people to the continuation of capitalism
 
I haven't done an exhaustive study of all such forms, but in the main they were, certainly.

Read Tooze's "Wages of Destruction", Bracher's "The German Dictatorship", or a host of other scholarly works that deal with the economy and economics of Nazism. Co-operative forms of ownership in small businesses were most often along early mutual lines. Hardly reactionary, and something that neither the Nazis nor the corporates liked. Some were based on old guild systems that were reactionary, but German labour, between the second half of the 19th century and Nazism, was the most heavily unionised and co-operatively-based in Europe.
 
Strasserite tendencies coming out now I see! (+ what was "quasi-democratic" about Mussolini's Italy?)
So I'm a Strasserite? :facepalm:
Read up on the economic implications of Italian fascism. I suggest de Grand's "Italian Fascism". What was "quasi-democratic" about it, was that it attempted to co-operativise agricultural production (Italy's main industry at the time) to the benefit of both the state and the peasantry.
 
This is a silly argument - the same one that said the creation of the welfare state/NHS were damaging because it reconciled people to the continuation of capitalism

If you believe that's the same argument,you're either even more stupid or even more dishonest than I'd previously thought.
 
Back
Top Bottom