Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
if only articul8 would use that as his tagline.The spewings of a member doesn't comprise policy or ideology.
if only articul8 would use that as his tagline.The spewings of a member doesn't comprise policy or ideology.
it suggests that the ideology is latent in an element of the membership, at the very least!The spewings of a member doesn't comprise policy or ideology.
Are you denying that forms of collective ownership in Nazi Germany, for example, are "reactionary"?can you name a nationalised british industry which is or was a reactionary form of collective ownership?
Of course they wouldn't publish public documents about aryan supremacy - but its clearly part of the ideological basis of their movement (just as there's a socialist legacy that's still actively present in the Labour party even though it's not often publicly avowed )
it suggests that the ideology is latent in an element of the membership, at the very least!
you don't think an element would quite happily liquidate Jews?The ideological basis of the BNP isn't based in "Aryan" supremacism, it's based in white supremacism and Euro-nationalism. The white supremacism doesn't mark a desire to liquidate non-whites, but a desire for separatism. They're cunts, but they're not Nazis, and don't draw their "separate but equal" ideology from Nazism.
Aren't you supposed to be well-educated? This is political ideology one-oh-fucking-one!
and we are meant to believe that's an entirely contingent circumstance, unrelated to his membership of the organisation?It suggests that the ideology is latent in a member. That's ALL it does.
I don't see how - only if you believe a somewhat neoliberalised version of social democracy is to the right of a ethnically exclusivist nationalistic/fascistic control of production.
it's an example - it's not neoliberal to tax wealth, it's social democratic
you don't think an element would quite happily liquidate Jews?
and we are meant to believe that's an entirely contingent circumstance, unrelated to his membership of the organisation?
I'm saying that what a Miliband government would set out to achieve was to adapt social democratic institutions (to the extent that they still exist - like the NHS), to a wider neoliberal framework *rather than* see them "dismantled and handed over" at quite the same rate. Of course this is not sufficient, and generally entails further attacks. But it's not the same as an outright promotion of neoliberalism for its own sake.
The question of Aryan vs White Supremacy is not germane to the point I was making, namely that the fascist state control of production cannot be considered "to the left" of pro-free market/private property neoliberals. They are not opposites.No, we're meant to not make assumptions based primarily on our preconceptions and prejudices. Prove your claim and we might get somewhere, otherwise you're just singing the SWP/UAF "BNP are Nazis" song that makes so many non-aligned (to the SWP/UAF) anti-fascists roll their eyes.
are you saying that all forms of collective ownership in germany between 1933 and 1945 were in your view reactionary?Are you denying that forms of collective ownership in Nazi Germany, for example, are "reactionary"?
I haven't done an exhaustive study of all such forms, but in the main they were, certainly.are you saying that all forms of collective ownership in germany between 1933 and 1945 were in your view reactionary?
The question of Aryan vs White Supremacy is not germane to the point I was making, namely that the fascist state control of production cannot be considered "to the left" of pro-free market/private property neoliberals. They are not opposites.
This is a silly argument - the same one that said the creation of the welfare state/NHS were damaging because it reconciled people to the continuation of capitalismIt's worse, because it gives people false hope of a new dawn, then sneaks neoliberalism in anyway. That you can't see that tells me that you either have the political nous of a dead cat, or are as politically-amoral as Tony Blair.
I haven't done an exhaustive study of all such forms, but in the main they were, certainly.
So I'm a Strasserite?Strasserite tendencies coming out now I see! (+ what was "quasi-democratic" about Mussolini's Italy?)
This is a silly argument - the same one that said the creation of the welfare state/NHS were damaging because it reconciled people to the continuation of capitalism
probably the same sort of things which are quasi-democratic in the labour partyStrasserite tendencies coming out now I see! (+ what was "quasi-democratic" about Mussolini's Italy?)
there are no limits to either his stupidity or his dishonesty.If you believe that's the same argument,you're either even more stupid or even more dishonest than I'd previously thought.
so you cannot name a nationalised british industry which was or is a reactionary form of collective ownership. you're an empty vessel and politically bankrupt.Are you denying that forms of collective ownership in Nazi Germany, for example, are "reactionary"?
Socialist Appeal seem to be having some SWP-style difficulties right now....Must've been Socialist Appeal.
I read most of the introductory blurb then lost the will ... what's happened?Socialist Appeal seem to be having some SWP-style difficulties right now....
https://peacetothecottageswaronthepalaces.wordpress.com/
What, rape apologists run what's left of the show, cover up abuse, and blame the victims?Socialist Appeal seem to be having some SWP-style difficulties right now....
https://peacetothecottageswaronthepalaces.wordpress.com/
It's being discussed on the SWP thread as wellI read most of the introductory blurb then lost the will ... what's happened?