this basically
Plaid are not in bed with tories and kippers and won't work with them
And you say this mere hours after they've worked togetherthis basically
Plaid are not in bed with tories and kippers and won't work with them
Eitherhow is it down to them?
It probably is as far as Plaid are concerned - I doubt the other parties involved are doing it for the same reason though.If its some sort of 'tactic' to force more negotiation with Labour as some seem to be suggesting, it seems a risky one.
how is it down to them?
“I was not re-elected to support a “a ragtag coalition made up of Ukip assembly members who at the moment can’t even agree with each other,”
what were they meant to do then? vote for a labour leader?Either
a) they did a deal with UKIP and the vermin, or
b) allowed themselves to be used by UKIP and the vermin.
Those are your options. Cyncism or wide-eyed naivety. Neither look that good.
what should plaid have done then? just let Carwyn carry on?At the very least they have allowed themselves to be used to legitimise UKIP as a force within the assembly. Are you saying Plaid are so naive that they didn't know exactly what UKIP and the Tories would do, largely for shits and giggles, in this scenario?
did what? they voted for their own candidateThe only thing generous spin I can give it is that they're pushing for some concession from Labour and did this to press the issue. They can then claim to have had some movement from Labour when they back down.
But the way to do that is to talk up Plaid policies and openly state they'll back Labour if they get some agreement some of these issues. That'd be honest and likely popular, I'd probably be up for some of the better Plaid policies from the Assembly Government. But no, they've either cynically been used or have cynically used UKIP and Tories to create an impasse.
did what? they voted for their own candidate
is that bad?
Leanne would be an ace first minister fwiw
sorry if missing it but looks like you are saying they should prop labour up??
what has the campaign round here got to do with Leanne? agree it was despicable and not a good look
why would they have to be propped up by tories and ukip? can't they be leader and do what you say about pressurising labour without making concessions?
it's a tragic shambles already with 7 fuckin kipper AM's, this is what kind of shit happens in these situations, it is going to be a nightmare, already is
Nobody has said thatsorry if missing it but looks like you are saying they should prop labour up??
How else would they have governed? Labour are hardly likely to help them out under these circumstances are they.why would they have to be propped up by tories and ukip? can't they be leader and do what you say about pressurising labour without making concessions?
Plumdaff Where is 'round here? And why was it despicable?
and let labour have it by default??You're saying that PC could not have decided to abstain?
Cardiff West. Mark Drakesford is the AM. Neil McEvoy, who has form anyway for his views on women's services, sent around leaflet after leaflet slagging off the NHS and just going for Drakesford personally rather than talking about Plaid policies. I work for the NHS, and yes there's problems, but I don't expect a supposed left of centre candidate to collude with the worst Tory bullshit about how terrible it is, with some mealy mouthed crap about not slagging off the workers, when you blatantly are. Some of Plaid's stuff on health was troublesome too.
right, so being the leader means governing now?Nobody has said that
How else would they have governed? Labour are hardly likely to help them out under these circumstances are they.
and let labour have it by default??
there have been a fair few things over the years, it needs sorting outI was unaware of this, I should have paid more attention