belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
about two, apparentlyDo we know what time the expected result is?
Turnout could be as high as 58%
about two, apparentlyDo we know what time the expected result is?
now that i do like,their taking odds on the libdems gettting less than 5% so the bookies may have to pay outLibscum could be as low as 2%
only if they beat bus pass elvis as wellThat's quite good for them in a parliamentary by election isn't it?
That's quite good for them in a parliamentary by election isn't it?
The Lib Dems' 1,004 votes represents their worst performance in a post-war English by-election.
Well, the tories damn well should win this seat. (It's no co-incidence that Farage declined the opportunity) Large parts of the south of the seat are filled with the type of tory supporter are the antithesis of disaffected; they've done very well out of the tory government, and any farmers with their heads screwed on should run a mile from any party that proposes separating them from their subsidies.
Of some interest, though, is the polling; two outfits have produced quite distinct numbers...will be interesting to see if Ashcroft's impressive sample size really does equate to a more accurate forecast, or whether Survation's decision not to re-allocate the DKs is closer to the mark.
I don't understand why all the papers are treating this as a Tory victory. They lost nigh on 10k votes, UKIP were up 22% and turnout collapsed by nearly 20%. If anything the real story is people are voting populist or not botheringto vote at all.
indie hospital campaigner 1891
libscum 1004 (2.6%)
The hospital campaigner was about 43 votes off getting their deposit back, which would have been nice. Otherwise, good result. 6th place, who'd have thought it
I don't understand why all the papers are treating this as a Tory victory.