I’m not seeing what’s inconsistent about this lodger’s views in this regard, even if their anti-vax position itself is questionable.
They now have somebody staying in their house that has come from elsewhere (whether that be Jamaica or York is not really the point). The lodger is not vaccinated and they know that this makes them vulnerable to infection. As such, it makes sense for them to take measures to protect themself.
I think people get mixed up between “anti-vaccine” and “COVID denier”. Somebody might be very well aware of how dangerous COVID is and yet have worries about taking a vaccine that outweigh their worries about COVID. They might be willing to gamble that they can ride out the rest of the coronavirus pandemic by hiding from it and take advantage down the road of everybody else having been vaccinated. It’s selfish and it is a dubious reading of relative risks but it’s not inconsistent.
They now have somebody staying in their house that has come from elsewhere (whether that be Jamaica or York is not really the point). The lodger is not vaccinated and they know that this makes them vulnerable to infection. As such, it makes sense for them to take measures to protect themself.
I think people get mixed up between “anti-vaccine” and “COVID denier”. Somebody might be very well aware of how dangerous COVID is and yet have worries about taking a vaccine that outweigh their worries about COVID. They might be willing to gamble that they can ride out the rest of the coronavirus pandemic by hiding from it and take advantage down the road of everybody else having been vaccinated. It’s selfish and it is a dubious reading of relative risks but it’s not inconsistent.