Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
Quite a few. Are you trying to argue that there shouldn't be any? Do you think that ALL government and security matters should be made completely public?How many of these counter-terrorism endeavours are for our benefit?
Quite a few. Are you trying to argue that there shouldn't be any? Do you think that ALL government and security matters should be made completely public?How many of these counter-terrorism endeavours are for our benefit?
Quite a few. Are you trying to argue that there shouldn't be any? Do you think that ALL government and security matters should be made completely public?
So why did the Wikileaks have such an impact?There is no official secrets act or similar in the US. They seem to cope...
How was interfering on the miners strike for the benefit of most people in this country? How did undermining a democratically elected PM help us? What about murdering a human rights lawyer? Helping to start wars? Spycops? The aim of these people is not to protect UK citizens it's to protect the interests of capital and the state, and that means most of their actions are actually harmful to workers.Quite a few. Are you trying to argue that there shouldn't be any?
Google Defense Secrets Act.There is no official secrets act or similar in the US. They seem to cope...
Well that pretty much negates everything else you've posted. I, in turn, accept that there have been substantial abuses of these laws, but the problem then becomes one of their application in which situations. There is obviously a need for secrecy in many processes so your blanket 'fuck the lot of them' is pretty sterile.I accept there will probably always be some need for some type of security service ...
What kind of shit house swears on their kids lives, irrespective of whether they're telling the truth (and a doubt he is)?Not sure about this but will post it anyway.
No it doesn't. The "security services" I imagine would be as different as from the present set as delegates democratically elected by workers soviets would be from the current inhabitants of the HoC.Well that pretty much negates everything else you've posted.
No it doesn't. The "security services" I imagine would be as different as from the present set as delegates democratically elected by workers soviets would be from the current inhabitants of the HoC.
They call it the Defense Secrets Act.
Also collusion with loyalist murderers was counterterrorism. But that was probably bad counterterrorism so Spymaster probably didn't mean that. Quite cute really.How many of these counter-terrorism endeavours actually benefit us, rather than serve to maintain the power of capital and the state.
These are the people who argued that because their illegal assistance in torture was found out they need to have extra secrecy protections so that in future such shit should not come to light.
But if they're keeping it secret how do we know whether it's the good kind or the bad kind?Quite a few. Are you trying to argue that there shouldn't be any? Do you think that ALL government and security matters should be made completely public?
Shame she hasn't got a fucking clue about how the EU works & Turkey being able to join without UK agreement. Seems more like a lie than being thick as pigshit left in the sun during a six week drought.Penny Maudant gets Defence, (has an excellent reputation as a junior defence minister, and is an RN reservist), and is even more opposed to Huawei than Williamson.
Is this some kind of refutation that "the security services" have done any good at all then? Of course you're right, all they do is infiltrate working class political groups, fuck women undercover, and probably murder people whilst fitting-up angels. That's it!But if they're keeping it secret how do we know whether it's the good kind or the bad kind?
How can somebody called Gavin Williamson have a signature that says JC?
Or maybe he's like Fiona Onasanya and thinks he's JesusImpressive pivot to bring Corbyn into it, tbf.
Who should get the contracts?I haven't read the whole thread, and I may get shot down for this, but I dont think Huawei (or Apple or Microsoft) should be given a contact like this by the UK.
Surely the whip must be applied immediately
I haven't read the whole thread, and I may get shot down for this, but I dont think Huawei (or Apple or Microsoft) should be given a contact like this by the UK.
No, just that they don't seem to be that great at anything else. I'm not sure why for example this one needed to be a secret. Locations of troops in a war or that kind of thing fair enough but that's not what we're talking about.Is this some kind of refutation that "the security services" have done any good at all then? Of course you're right, all they do is infiltrate working class political groups, fuck women undercover, and probably murder people whilst fitting-up angels. That's it!
Don't forget, all British soldiers kill brown babies too, maaaan.
I haven't read the whole thread, and I may get shot down for this, but I dont think Huawei (or Apple or Microsoft) should be given a contact like this by the UK.
If this Tory prick has exposed it he has done the right thing.
with Brexit the capitalist class is desperate to sign "free trade deals" with whoever it can, and this is just part of that process. The scum would sell the lot of us for a contract to export fucking Cornish pasties.