Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
May now saying no need for Williamson to lose whip or for a police investigation.
Wiliiamson should come back swinging here,.
Wot! FFS!
May now saying no need for Williamson to lose whip or for a police investigation.
Wiliiamson should come back swinging here,.
He can pay for that himself!
I refer the hon gentleman to the answer I gave a few moments agoHe can pay for that himself!
He voted for her deal.May now saying no need for Williamson to lose whip or for a police investigation
Mr Williamson, who has been defence secretary since 2017, "strenuously" denies leaking the information. In a meeting with Mr Williamson on Wednesday evening, Theresa May told him she had information that provided "compelling evidence" that he was responsible for the unauthorised disclosure.
In a letter confirming his dismissal, she said: "No other, credible version of events to explain this leak has been identified." Responding in a letter to the PM, Mr Williamson said he was "confident" that a "thorough and formal inquiry" would have "vindicated" his position.
How could anyone trust a man with that signature?He is denying the leaks.
That depends on who you believe. The anti-Huawei campaign is seriously political and accelerated by the US, with the Trump administration putting a lot of pressure on governments, especially Australia and NZ, to exclude their network hardware. Hauwei are largely considered ok in Europe and Ireland, with oversight and certain restrictions, and by the sound of it Her Majesty's Government were just about to stick two fingers up at the yanks. The other side of that is that Huawei is a god awful company that has been stealing western IP for years and couldn't give a fuck about employment rights, so swings and roundabouts really.But it's good that this info was leaked.
Fine, but why shouldn't we know the thoughts of those (supposedly) responsible on UK security on this matter? Fuck that secrecy and fuck the NCS, GCHQ, MI5, MI6 and the rest - these people have been shown time and time again to throw UK citizens to the dogs when "needed".That depends on who you believe. The anti-Huawei campaign is very political and accelerated by the US, with the Trump administration putting a lot of pressure on governments, especiallyb Australia and NZ, to exclude their network hardware. Hauwei are largely considered ok in Europe and Ireland, with oversight and certain restrictions, and by the sound of it Her Majesty's Government were just about to stick two fingers up at the yanks. The other side of that is that Huawei is a god awful company that has been stealing western IP for years and couldn't give a fuck about employment rights, so swings and roundabouts really.
What we need to know is what gw hasn't leakedFine, but why shouldn't we know the thoughts of those (supposedly) responsible on UK security on this matter? Fuck that secrecy and fuck the NCS, GCHQ, MI5, MI6 and the rest - these people have been shown time and time again to throw UK citizens to the dogs when "needed".
How could anyone trust a man with that signature?
On which matter? There's an obvious need for secrecy in lots of security matters.Fine, but why shouldn't we know the thoughts of those (supposedly) responsible on UK security on this matter?
Fine, but why shouldn't we know the thoughts of those (supposedly) responsible on UK security on this matter?
Is there? Like whether MI5 interfered in the Miners Strike? Or how the security services conspired with Loyalist paramilitaries to kill people?On which matter? There's an obvious need for secrecy in lots of security matters.
Sure, as I said he can go fuck himself. But let's not pretend the rest of the wankers that make up the NSC are any more honourable. Filth one and all.Fine but I wouldn’t trust GW’s thoughts if he said “hello”. There is nothing honourable in his reasons for doing this.
It's "Yours ever,How can somebody called Gavin Williamson have a signature that says JC?
There's something he has been meaning to tell usHow can somebody called Gavin Williamson have a signature that says JC?
Well that's one end of the spectrum. The other would be the operational security of counter-terrorism endeavours, cyber-crime, organised crime, industrial espionage, people trafficking ... etc, etc, etcIs there? Like whether MI5 interfered in the Miners Strike? Or how the security services conspired with Loyalist paramilitaries to kill people?
Does anyone know if he has any children?Not sure about this but will post it anyway.
I'm sure he's the type who'd be quite happy to gas any number of children (interesting Freudian slip)Does anyone know if he gas any children?
Not sure about this but will post it anyway.
And often does. Allegedly.
Wanting a spanking from a nice young lady & getting one from a brutish teacher maybe quite different experiences. I know you are getting on in years but laughing about child abuse? WTFWhen corporal punishment was finally abolished in public schools, I recall a letter to the Telegraph, where the writer said:
'Those youngsters, they don't know how privileged they were, what they were getting for free, well, he had to pay a nice young lady in Soho Square quite handsomely to receive'.
I think the squaddies liked him, kebabking?
How many of these counter-terrorism endeavours actually benefit us, rather than serve to maintain the power of capital and the state.Well that's one end of the spectrum. The other would be operational security of counter-terrorism endeavours, cyber-crime, organised crime, industrial espionage ... etc, etc, etc