"No Blood" at Oswald shooting claims photographer

[WouldBe]

What "doctor" at what hospital?

The doctor caring for Diana at the hospital she was admitted to.

 

[editor]

The doctor caring for Diana at the hospital she was admitted to.

The actual doctor who was charged with looking after Diana?

Name, if you please.

 

[WouldBe]

The actual doctor who was charged with looking after Diana?

Name, if you please.

Er it's 9 years ago.

 

[editor]

Er it's 9 years ago.

Oh, OK, I'll just take your word for it then because there'll clearly be no other record of this doctor's statement to be found anywhere on the web other than in your faded memory, yes?

 

[WouldBe]

Think what you like. I distinctly remember it.

Don't suppose there is anywhere on the net you can download 9 year old news24 from?

 

[snorbury]

Think what you like. I distinctly remember it.

Don't suppose there is anywhere on the net you can download 9 year old news24 from?

no, don't think what you like, think what you're told

 

[editor]

Think what you like. I distinctly remember it.

Don't suppose there is anywhere on the net you can download 9 year old news24 from?

Looks like your memory's already letting you down and proving to be dodgy.

BBC News24 didn't launch until several months after Diana's death!
So you must have dreamt that bit!


And why do you think that only they would have covered these doctor's remarks and no one else?

 

[editor]

no, don't think what you like, think what you're told

What are you babbling on about?

 

[snorbury]

Maybe it was a stun gun, maybe Dianna was the goddess, maybe we're being controlled from another dimension. We know no more about these matters than which horse is going to win the 2-45 at Cheltenham. Adrenaline is all, well maybe conspiracy and adrenaline

 

[TonkaToy]

What are you babbling on about?

If you hate conspiracy threads so much, why are you bumping them, rather than binning them?



* Makes dash for coat.

 

[WouldBe]

Looks like your memory's already letting you down and proving to be dodgy.

BBC News24 didn't launch until several months after Diana's death!
So you must have dreamt that bit!

Therw is a (?) after news 24 in my post. It may have been a BBC news flash between programs.

And why do you think that only they would have covered these doctor's remarks and no one else?

Where did I say the BBC were the only ones to cover this?

 

[Blagsta]

I think its more likely that in the confusion that occurs after a big news story like that, someone was interviewed who didn't have the full facts. Happens all the time I would imagine.

 

[Crispy]

Like the "It sounded like a bomb" eyewitness accounts on 9/11. Eyewitness accounts are notoriously unreliable.

 

[editor]

Where did I say the BBC were the only ones to cover this?

Because you haven't managed to come up with a single other documented source for this doctor's words!

 

[Jazzz]

Like the "It sounded like a bomb" eyewitness accounts on 9/11. Eyewitness accounts are notoriously unreliable.

It's amazing how many were fooled there.

Check out this newsreader's piece. Or this one from one of our British BBC chaps.

Even firefighters were knocked over by the phoney explosions!
Here's another firefighter.

All mistaken, doubtless.

...but what the fuck is this exactly?

 

[mauvais]

Christ's fat fucking cock!


*keels over and dies*

 

[TeeJay]

"...but what the fuck is this exactly?"

"Christ's fat fucking cock!"

Jazzz, did you just link to a new picture of the Turin shroud or something?

 

[editor]

It's amazing how many were fooled there.

Check out this newsreader's piece. Or this one from one of our British BBC chaps.

For fuck's sake.

Things in buildings explode when they're on fire. That's what they do.

Here: try this little experiment at home. Make a bonfire in your garden and once it gets going shove in lots of different things from around the house - you know, regualar things like chairs, cannisters, TVs and the like.

Sooner or later, you'll get lots of explosions, just like a mini-WTC, with no conspiraloonery involved! Amazing!

 

[Yossarian]

Nah, those explosions would clearly be the mini-explosives CIA and Mossad agents planted in Jazzz's bonfire - he must be getting *very* close to the truth!

 

[Loki]

I didn't imagine a building fire would be much like a nice predictable coal / wood fire. I'm sure it would be a lot easier for fire crews if it was that simple.

 

[pk]

Unless the fire was lit from deep within the rabbit-hole...

*takes red pill*

 

[Dhimmi]

Let me get this right; Oswald Mosley flew a plane into the World Trade Center as part of a Jewish conspiracy?
This is just the kind of thing we should see on television, the cartoon channel is just too staid...

 

[Mungy]

i was watching tv a few years back when one of the seemingly annual train crashes was anounced on news 24 (i think it was potters bar, but i can't be sure now). they briefly shown what appeared to be an overhead video of the crash as it hapened. I watched news 24 for most of th night, but i never saw the overhead film again. both my wife and i saw it and thought it was very strange at the time.

 

[hipipol]

I blame Thatcher

Closing the mental homes was a mistake
Care in the Community?
Bollocks
Those who should be tranqed to bubbling imbecility are now blogged/lizard conspracied to bubbling imbecility and are also free to post here
That bitch, bet she wuz a Lizard too

 

[belboid]

Oh, OK, I'll just take your word for it then because there'll clearly be no other record of this doctor's statement to be found anywhere on the web other than in your faded memory, yes?

I actually recall BBC radio news broadcasts from the night reporting exactly the same thing - no quotes from doctors that I rcall, but the initial storywas definitely that she had just broken her arm.

 

[editor]

I actually recall BBC radio news broadcasts from the night reporting exactly the same thing - no quotes from doctors that I rcall, but the initial storywas definitely that she had just broken her arm.

Sure: but WouldBe is claiming it was the "doctor caring for Diana at the hospital she was admitted to" who made that claim.

And that would clearly be a very strange thing to say.

 

[Jazzz]

For fuck's sake.

Things in buildings explode when they're on fire. That's what they do.

Here: try this little experiment at home. Make a bonfire in your garden and once it gets going shove in lots of different things from around the house - you know, regualar things like chairs, cannisters, TVs and the like.

Sooner or later, you'll get lots of explosions, just like a mini-WTC, with no conspiraloonery involved! Amazing!

I don't think so. Have another look at the clips I linked to (you did see the last one?). These are clearly really big explosions. In the first the newsreader (link corrected) explains how the fire crews were warning that another explosion (not fire damage) might bring down the building. In the second, Evans specifies that one big explosion is 'much lower down' than the floors were the fires were. Then we have firefighters referring to a 'heavy duty' explosion and being knocked over, and one must assume that they weren't inside the flames.

Yes, buildings on fire will cause explosions. But compare the Windsor Madrid fire:

"The fire started around 11:30 p.m. Saturday and was still burning out of control about three hours later. At least nine upper stories were on fire and muffled explosions could be heard in the building."

(my emphasis)

The fire in the Windsor building (which of course, remained standing) made the WTC fires look like rather demur, yet there was nothing 'muffled' about the explosions being reported on 9/11 and well you can hear one of the them for yourself which mauvais well describes.

Here's a few more tidbits:

bomb-sniffing dogs removed from WTC security

Power-down meant engineers could come and go as they pleased

...in the days before 9/11.

 

[editor]

I don't think so. Have another look at the clips I linked to (you did see the last one?). These are clearly really big explosions.

So how many 9/11 on-duty fire chiefs - you know the people who know more about fires and explosives than the entire cast of conspiraloons put together - have said that that the WTC was pre-wired with explosives then, Jazzz? Or are they all mistaken?

bomb-sniffing dogs removed from WTC security

Power-down meant engineers could come and go as they pleased

...in the days before 9/11.

I don't believe anything written on PrisonPlanet, but going along with their idiotic claims means that the entire WTC was invisibly wired with enough invisible explosives to bring the building down perfectly with the undercover installation taking a matter of days.

Now you find me an explosives expert that says that's possible.

And then we can deal with the remarkable and truly bizarre notion that not a single soul in the entire WTC saw these hastily-installed tons of explosives.

 

[Bob_the_lost]

Oh for fucks sake. This is taking the piss.

Any thread started by conspiraloons, given long enough will end up rehashing 9/11.

 

[Spymaster]

I like these threads.

I check them out every 4 or 5 days for a laugh.

I like Jazz, he seems like a decent chap when he's not barking bonkers bollocks, and when he is the way he winds the rest of you up is most entertaining.

Do you think he really believes this stuff? I reckon Jazz could be the most sophisticated troll on the web!