If you were aroundMarx in the 19th C you'd ignore him, as not being part of the realistic working class movement.it might to a great extent, it might to a negligible extent. If Marx was around today, you lot would be saying "it's ok for him he's married into the aristocracy of Westphalia" and how he spends ages reading works of political economy rather than going down the mines.
Yes, she's latin american. Or English.As a materialist, would it surprise you that people who have shared a similar climate, language(s), religious culture over centuries, etc etc would exhibit certain behavioural traits in common?
What tribe of arrogant smug tossers did you do your gap year with then?people can be influenced by experience of other cultures, no?
people can be influenced by experience of other cultures, no?
Yes, because that's what all criticisms of privilege and how it works in real life are actually saying. Get down the mine. You don't get that you're building this seperation, you're reinforcing it with every post. Oh that's just what they're like. And anyway, like frig is she an intellectual.it might to a great extent, it might to a negligible extent. If Marx was around today, you lot would be saying "it's ok for him he's married into the aristocracy of Westphalia" and how he spends ages reading works of political economy rather than going down the mines.
An intellectual is someone who's uncle owns a publishing firm.
Original contentI like this line.
Because Terry Eagleton. Karl Marx.I think articul8 has made the point that I was trying to make in my post far better than I was able to
. Get down the mine. You don't get that you're building this seperation, you're reinforcing it with every post. Oh that's just what they're like. And anyway, like frig is she an intellectual.
What a pompous question. Stupid too.What is, and what should be the role of the intellectual in your view? Marx had a brief go at organising, it didn't work out, he went back to the library for ages and had another crack a good few years later. But he wasn't ever organically w/c. This isn't a criticism - it's a fact of life in class society. Doesn't mean the divisions can't be broken down.
Stop using Karl Marx as an example, because he's widely regarded as a groundbreaking genius. It's like using the example of Isaac Newton to argue that it's ok for scientists to believe in astrology and alchemy.What is, and what should be the role of the intellectual in your view? Marx had a brief go at organising, it didn't work out, he went back to the library for ages and had another crack a good few years later. But he wasn't ever organically w/c. This isn't a criticism - it's a fact of life in class society. Doesn't mean the divisions can't be broken down.
They should go to the peasants in the latter half of the 19th century, then later form small terrorist cells, only later using the zemstvos as a vehicle for wider social organising and finally dominate the Constituent assembly in 1918.OK let me rephrase - given that it is a fact of class society that postgraduate education (or equivalent levels of access to skills which require a high degree of familiarity with analytical approaches, technical vocabularies, concepts ets) are distributed highly unequally - how can those in possession of them make these skills available to much broader sections of the population whose role in class society has been mostly limited to manual tasks?
No, your second album "because Lenin" will get bad reviews, critics will slam it's apparent lack of sincerity.Lenin reckoned that Marxism was thought up by the intellectuals are only later incorporated into working class politics.
Wow. 150 years after the idea of the general intellect and you come out with this fabian nonsense.OK let me rephrase - given that it is a fact of class society that postgraduate education (or equivalent levels of access to skills which require a high degree of familiarity with analytical approaches, technical vocabularies, concepts ets) are distributed highly unequally - how can those in possession of them make these skills available to much broader sections of the population whose role in class society has been mostly limited to manual tasks?
Why on earth have you said this?Lenin reckoned that Marxism was thought up by the intellectuals are only later incorporated into working class politics.
jesu christI'm not saying that roles should be frozen, I'm talking about in terms of transitional tasks
Authenticity is a key value in cultural capital.
To what extent is that then?
You're a bit like jesus and she's a bit like marx. Fucking hell.
Secretly jesus.
Yes, humour the boss. It's just her way.