Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail "hacked by News of the World"

They are not innocent workers anymore. They are feckless lazy benefit scroungers sponging off the taxpayer to pay for their plasma TV's, SKY TV subscriptions (oh the irony) and beer and fags.

D'you reckon they should picket Wapping, dylans? Or would that be an affront to honest workers whose taxes are splurged on public sector pensions? Should we think of the children on this?
 
You could say that about any commercial company that's in business to make money! Should their workers have no rights?

How many workers hack the phones of murdered children and terrorist victims for their own ends?

Jesus, do I have to draw you a diagram on this one?
 
I tried watching Question Time but I can't cos I think the BBC is a load of ol ponce as well
Heads back to General
 
*lightbulb moment*

They're protecting James Murdoch, not Rebekah Brooks. She's buying him time to get clear (they shifted him out of the UK recently and left her in charge). And 200 journos are buying time for her.

Wonder if she knows, and if she'll rat when they ditch her.
 
They are not innocent workers anymore. They are feckless lazy benefit scroungers sponging off the taxpayer to pay for their plasma TV's, SKY TV subscriptions (oh the irony) and beer and fags.

But they should still look on the bright side. After all, and as hacks everywhere all know, they'll be able to afford all of life's luxuries and any that they can't afford will be given to them by the State, free, gratis and for nothing. And they'll never have to seek gainful employment ever again.

Which will be handy for some of them as I don't see them being employed as reporters any more.
 
link could be bullshit but pure evil if he can and really puts a different angle on it.

The two problems with that are basically that (a) a lot of stuff has already been seized, and there will be records that are out of the control of News International, and (b) there is nothing to stop the liquidator selling the records to a rival - indeed you would probably see a lot of people wanting to get their hands on those documents.

Plus, of course, if it was that easy to avoid legal action against a subsidiary I am sure firms would be doing it all the time.
 
The other half's pals work for the Fabulous magazine, so felt a twinge of sorrow for them, but now hear that part of it is carrying on! Happy days!
 
How many workers hack the phones of murdered children and terrorist victims for their own ends?

Jesus, do I have to draw you a diagram on this one?

It would be interesting to see a diagram displaying how many of the redundant workers hacked the phones of murdered children and terrorist victims for their own ends.
 
*lightbulb moment*

They're protecting James Murdoch, not Rebekah Brooks. She's buying him time to get clear (they shifted him out of the UK recently and left her in charge). And 200 journos are buying time for her.

Wonder if she knows, and if she'll rat when they ditch her.

The only person James needs protecting from is his dad, or perhaps (to use one of Private Eyes ongoing jokes) his stepmother.
 
The two problems with that are basically that (a) a lot of stuff has already been seized, and there will be records that are out of the control of News International, and (b) there is nothing to stop the liquidator selling the records to a rival - indeed you would probably see a lot of people wanting to get their hands on those documents. Plus, of course, if it was that easy to avoid legal action against a subsidiary I am sure firms would be doing it all the time.

Anything in NI's possession that needed to be lost will have gone LONG ago. No question, not sure how the legal opinion changes this?
 
Interesting that working for a Murdoch rag, churning out vicious anti-worker, pro-Tory bile is considered an honourable profession as long as you didn't engage in phone hacking.
 
It would be interesting to see a diagram displaying how many of the redundant workers hacked the phones of murdered children and terrorist victims for their own ends.

Yes. it would also be VERY interesting to see how many of the redundant workers knew exactly what was going on, but chose to do nothing about it, hmm?

You seem to have missed my basic point too - one of Conscience.

Feel free to reply, though - I'll be here all evening, my sweet ;)
 
Interesting that working for a Murdoch rag, churning out vicious anti-worker, pro-Tory bile is considered an honourable profession as long as you didn't engage in phone hacking.

You'd think it was much more honourable than teaching - the selfish cunts striking to keep their big pensions.
 
The closure of the News of the World which you all wanted has simply put innocent people out of work. Will the guilty ever be brought to justice?

Have you ever read any of Nick Davies' columns (only the latest example of very very many here)?

Do you know who Greg Miskiw, Alex Marunchak, Glenn Mulcaire, Steve Whittamore, Jonathan Rees, Sid Fillery are??

Had you ever actually heard of any single one of them before you dove into this thread with bull in a chinashop sized boots?

Can you offer any knowledgeable and critical analysis (using NORMAL definitions of 'innocence' and guilt) of the exact details of what they all got up to?

If not, shove your blatant trolling up your Upchuck-like arse.
 
Apparently Piers Moron is throwing his toys out of the pram on Twitter....and he is. It's hilarious (follow the Moron on @piersmorgan, and get thee to trolling)
 
Have you read Nick Davies' columns (only the latest example of very very many here)?

Do you know who Greg Miskiw, Alex Marunchak, Glenn Mulcaire, Steve Whittamore, Jonathan Rees, Sid Fillery are??

Can you offer any knowledgeable and critical analysis (using NORMAL definitions of 'innocence' and guilt) of the exact details of what they all got up to?

If not, shove your blatant trolling up your Upchuck-like arse.

No, I don't know who they are. I didn't realise we had to have certain qualifications and knowledge to be allowed to post here. Perhaps you could let me know the rules?
 
You seem to be saying that anyone who works for a corporation should take the blame for anything that corporation does.

128968069463932973.jpg
 
What, even the low-paid shitworkers?

I'll give you that, LLETSA (how on earth is the cleaner is meant to influence the chairman etc). Me were thinking more of the office worker type when it comes to corps, but yer right, corps is much more than office workers.
 
Back
Top Bottom