Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail "hacked by News of the World"

Yep. News interanational kicked to death by all the people its fucked over in the past.

Joy joy and joy.

The queue for that particular pleasure is likely to be a very long one indeed, possibly resembling the January sales when people camp out for days or weeks in advance.
 
Thanks for that, and that Oborne piece deserves to be read in full. That graph is brilliant, as well:

1_fullsize.jpg
yes, i have just read back through the posts and see where your comment came from and reallise i was missing your point. sorry.
 
Ironically, Cameron had a reception for the 59 nominees for 2011 Police Bravery Award (sponsored by News International) at Number 10 tonight.
 
From a link on FB.....

'Rupert Murdoch’s soon-to-be shuttered tabloid may not be obliged to retain documents that could be relevant to civil and criminal claims against the newspaper—even in cases that are already underway. That could mean that dozens of sports, media, and political celebrities who claim News of the World hacked into their telephone accounts won’t be able to find out exactly what the tabloid knew and how it got the information.'

http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/07/07/is-murdoch-free-to-destroy-tabloids-records/

:eek: :mad:
 
i reckon they know she's toxic, but areleaving it as long as possible before getting rid of her, so all the shit goes with her. right now she's the target, once she's gone cameron and murdoch are next. so she'll go at the last possible moment, and draw the most shit 'til then

Either that or she knows where the bodies are buried...
 
From a link on FB.....

'Rupert Murdoch’s soon-to-be shuttered tabloid may not be obliged to retain documents that could be relevant to civil and criminal claims against the newspaper—even in cases that are already underway. That could mean that dozens of sports, media, and political celebrities who claim News of the World hacked into their telephone accounts won’t be able to find out exactly what the tabloid knew and how it got the information.'

http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/07/07/is-murdoch-free-to-destroy-tabloids-records/

:eek: :mad:
there's also the implication that if the notw business has effectively ceased trading, anyone seeking financial redress may find it difficult to secure any compensation (can't remember where i just read this).

there's so much more to this than meets the eye :hmm:
 
From a link on FB.....

'Rupert Murdoch’s soon-to-be shuttered tabloid may not be obliged to retain documents that could be relevant to civil and criminal claims against the newspaper—even in cases that are already underway. That could mean that dozens of sports, media, and political celebrities who claim News of the World hacked into their telephone accounts won’t be able to find out exactly what the tabloid knew and how it got the information.'

http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/07/07/is-murdoch-free-to-destroy-tabloids-records/

:eek: :mad:

Well, there you go then. If the Met had any sense they would go in tonight, declare the place a potential crime scene and confiscate computers and papers. Obviously they won't. Dragging some teenage script-kiddie out of his room in Essex, yeah sure they can do that, going after the number one opinion leader in this country - not so much. :mad:

And welcome Thirty Foot Smurf. Have a hob nob, you owe dubversion a fiver, you're clearly not firky, and don't forget to tell Dwyer to fuck off, when you see him
Welcome to urbanz ThirtyFootSmurf :)

Thx. :)
 
I reckon being the editor of the news of the world she must have a lot of dirt on a hell of a lot of people.
 
The closure makes zero difference to any civil or criminal cases
something i've read suggested that the likelihood of successful civil claims for compensation being realised would be minimal. doesn't stop someone taking civil action, simply their chances of securing compensation. tories think we're a litigation nation anyway, so they won't mind...anyways, minor point, not worth dwelling on.
 
I'm flabbergasted at how far they are going to protect Rebecca Brooks - and really whats in it for her now? She must know shes fucked, shes toxic - I really dont get it. She could resign, negotiate a big pay off and dissapear. Apparently she offered he resignation and the NI board regected it! And surely she odds on to have her collar felt.

Are they all mental?
 
I'm flabbergasted at how far they are going to protect Rebecca Brooks - and really whats in it for her now? She must know shes fucked, shes toxic - I really dont get it. She could resign, negotiate a big pay off and dissapear. Apparently she offered he resignation and the NI board regected it - I just dont get it. And surely she odds on to have her collar felt.

Are they all mental?

She's obviously got pics of her doing Rupert up the jacksie with a strap-on.
 
Back
Top Bottom