Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail "hacked by News of the World"

It would have saved the inept Committee a lot of time on Tuesday if they'd thought to write to, or call, Max Cliford on the question of whether his £million payoff was subject to a confidentiality clause - Gavin Ezler just asked him straight last night: "No, I didn't sign anything".

This affair needs trained lawyers (as per the PI). End of.

Yes, I saw that, very enlightenning, however Clifford does seem quite pro NI and when I mentioned him before on this thread it was suggested that he may be being paid to speak up for them.
 
I thought you were talking about the pie thrower..

What I am saying is the Parliamentary committees are intended to enhance the reputation of Parliament. Several times now, on Newsnight last night and on other news reports we have heard politicians patting themselves on the back and making precisely the point that these hearings have elevated and enhanced the status of Parliament and politicians as an institution. This is quite staggering really considering that the events of the past few weeks have demonstrated the utter corruption of Parliament by its relations to Murdoch.

When people attack the kinds of stunts that disturb these events, what they are suggesting is that these committees deserve our respect. I don't think they do.
 
When people attack the kinds of stunts that disturb these events, what they are suggesting is that these committees deserve our respect. I don't think they do.

Not really. This bloke created sympathy for Murdoch. Attacking that has got nothing to do with giving the committee respect.
 
Slightly OT but on TV last night they showed a smallish executive jet taking off from somewhere like Farnborough and said, there he goes Rupert Murduch is leaving Britain after his appearance before the select committee. I wondered about that, assuming he would be returning to America or perhps Australia. But a small executive jet could not fly to the USA could it?
 
No he didn't.

In the eyes of some, he did, dylans. There was plenty of coverage on TV of the 'an 80 year old man was hit in the face' ilk. The committe described it as 'unnacceptable' and said he was 'courageous' to carry on being questioned.
 
Regarding the committees @dyans I was struck by how people like Watson (CMS) were billed as having focussed on the Murduch issues for a long time and being some kind of expert, yet when he had an extended period of questionning he (Watson) seemed unable to land a single blow, despite that Rupert Murduch seemed quite compliant to his interrogation.
 
Slightly OT but on TV last night they showed a smallish executive jet taking off from somewhere like Farnborough and said, there he goes Rupert Murduch is leaving Britain after his appearance before the select committee. I wondered about that, assuming he would be returning to America or perhps Australia. But a small executive jet could not fly to the USA could it?

Yes, although I believe some of them re-fuel in Ireland.
 
Oh poor Rupert he got a pie in the face. OK, he corrupted the entire political establishment and hacked a murdered girls phone but that doesn't matter cus he got a pie in the face boo hoo. Give me a break.

Saying the protestor created sympathy for Murdoch doesn't mean you have to sympathetic to him yourself.
 
Oh poor Rupert he got a pie in the face. OK, he corrupted the entire political establishment and hacked a murdered girls phone but that doesn't matter cus he got a pie in the face boo hoo. Give me a break.

And that's why the pie throwing was such an utterly pointless act.
 
In the eyes of some, he did, dylans. There was plenty of coverage on TV of the 'an 80 year old man was hit in the face' ilk. The committe described it as 'unnacceptable' and said he was 'courageous' to carry on being questioned.

Of course they did. Big deal. Louise Mensch was outraged, Who gives a shit if she is outraged that the solemnity of her circus was disturbed? When a few black bloc types smashed up a couple of banks, the same bullshit outrage was expressed about their actions. Should we queue up to join in the condemnation? No. We should recognise that those doing the condemning are a bunch of hypocrites. As I said, I don't advocate these kinds of individualist stunts anymore than I advocate black bloc actions but I am not going to join in with the bullshit fake outrage either.
 
Pie Man shifted the focus with his pie, and not in a good way. So, bullshit about those opposing his actions as being somehow supportive of the system you love to hate from the comfort of your armchair is not holding any water with me, and I suspect NVP feels similarly, although I'm sure he'll confirm whether he does or not.
 
Of course they did. Big deal. Louise Mensch was outraged, Who gives a shit if she is outraged that the solemnity of her circus was disturbed? When a few black bloc types smashed up a couple of banks, the same bullshit outrage was expressed about their actions. Should we queue up to join in the condemnation? No. We should recognise that those doing the condemning are a bunch of hypocrites. As I said, I don't advocate these kinds of individualist stunts anymore than I advocate black bloc actions but I am not going to join in with the bullshit fake outrage either.

Who here is joining in any outrage?
 
Of course they did. Big deal. Louise Mensch was outraged, Who gives a shit if she is outraged that the solemnity of her circus was disturbed? When a few black bloc types smashed up a couple of banks, the same bullshit outrage was expressed about their actions. Should we queue up to join in the condemnation? No. We should recognise that those doing the condemning are a bunch of hypocrites. As I said, I don't advocate these kinds of individualist stunts anymore than I advocate black bloc actions but I am not going to join in with the bullshit fake outrage either.

Or you could ignore it and talk about the actual issues. That was two days ago and now irrelevant.
 
Regarding the committees @dyans I was struck by how people like Watson (CMS) were billed as having focussed on the Murduch issues for a long time and being some kind of expert, yet when he had an extended period of questionning he (Watson) seemed unable to land a single blow, despite that Rupert Murduch seemed quite compliant to his interrogation.

They were pathetic. The Murdochs used the entire event as a reputation building exercise as did the politicians. "the most humble day of my life". I thought this guy summed it up pretty well.
I find it hard to believe that anybody can watch today’s clutch of Select Committee hearings without coming away with one overwhelming impression; the extraordinarily low quality of the UK’s Members of Parliament. With the noble exception of Tom Watson, I don’t think anyone has enhanced their reputation today. I have often blogged about the fact that for centuries Parliament contained many of the intellectually brilliant, of a whole variety of political persuasions, but beyond doubt amongst the most outstanding minds and extraordinary people of their generation. This was still true in my earlier lifetime.

Parliament nowadays is full of dull party hacks of a middle management mentality. The number of parliamentarians I would enjoy sitting next to at dinner, is tiny. How many parliamentarians would you enjoy a dinner with? Most of them are in it, not to serve their country, but as a career. What really agitates them is anything affecting their expenses and their pensions.

The Murdochs could bat away these pompous blunderers all day. Even the dull transatlantic management speak of James Murdoch baffles them. It is humiliating for this country that these dullards are our representatives.

http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2011/07/murdoch-circus/
 
Enjoy dinner with?

They're not inquisitors, nor were they elected to be. Even if they were rubbish it's not exactly the issue to judge them on.
 
Of course they did. Big deal. Louise Mensch was outraged, Who gives a shit if she is outraged that the solemnity of her circus was disturbed? When a few black bloc types smashed up a couple of banks, the same bullshit outrage was expressed about their actions. Should we queue up to join in the condemnation? No. We should recognise that those doing the condemning are a bunch of hypocrites. As I said, I don't advocate these kinds of individualist stunts anymore than I advocate black bloc actions but I am not going to join in with the bullshit fake outrage either.

OK, then. Well there'll be plenty of folk out there who will agree with the outrage, fake or otherwise, and this will have the effect of creating sympathy for Murdoch. That's all I'm saying. No-ones asking you to join in with it. Attacking this stunt as counterproductive has absolutely nothing to do with giving the committee respect.
 
No. I have said my bit. I just thought an alternative view needed to be expressed. We can move on now if you like

No, I think you should make a new thread, because other people might want to reply and give their opinion, plus you won't get the broader view from this one due to limited participation and a desire not to lose sight of the matter at hand.
 
Back
Top Bottom