It's like Harry Potter killed Voldemort. Miliband born to be Potter. Brooks born to be Bellatrix. Ulrika, Mrs Weasley. Cameron is Malfoy, obv
You don't get it, do you. This isn't about hacking. It's about Murdoch wielding power over parliament and police force, using the methods of the mafia to intimidate people into silence and to buy favours, to spread police smears and the securuty agenda, to make five Prime Ministers (at least) and ten or more governments and parliaments accede to his political agenda.
And then he exported it to America in a new form. Fox News, with tabloidisation of their much better media in the planning.
It's not about hacking. Really.
He broke the story that destroyed a 168-year-old newspaper, humiliated one of the world's most powerful media moguls and cast a spotlight on a phone hacking scandal that has embroiled politicians, police and journalists.
And he says there is more to come.
Guardian journalist Nick Davies spent years investigating phone hacking claims in the face of police indifference and ridicule from rivals.
"It's a great story about the abuse of power," Davies told The Associated Press. "That's what all journalists want to expose, isn't it? The abuse of power."
...
"When I wrote the story about Milly Dowler, I sent an email to [my] editor saying I think this is the most powerful story so far. But I did not foresee the extent of the emotional impact," Davies told the AP.
"It was almost unreal to watch ... The Prime Minister, who had been so close to Murdoch and keen to defend the BSkyB and defend Coulson suddenly flipped his position."
http://www.smh.com.au/business/medi...-brought-down-a-newspaper-20110714-1hf5f.html
Rupert Murdoch has attacked Gordon Brown in a fierce defence of News Corporation's handling of the phone hacking scandal. Murdoch accused British MPs of lying about allegations of corrupt practices at his newspapers.
...
"The Browns were always friends of ours" until the Sun withdrew its support for Labour before the last general election, he told the Wall Street Journal, his flagship US paper.
On Twitter, Murdoch's biographer Michael Wolff said he "seemed genuinely distressed about Gordon Brown not liking him anymore.
...
He admitted "getting annoyed" about the negative media coverage of the scandal but said: I'll get over it."
Ever wondered howa powerful person looks when they know they're going down?
Example 1: Rupert Murdoch
Example 2: Bernard Madoff
Ever wondered howa powerful person looks when they know they're going down?
Example 1: Rupert Murdoch
Example 2: Bernard Madoff
Apols if this has been posted already butSteve bell and Martin rowson have been quite brilliant of late,that made me chuckle
if you think the right to privacy's bullshit, why the fuck are you hiding behind an alias?
You don't get it, do you. This isn't about hacking. It's about Murdoch wielding power over parliament and police force, using the methods of the mafia to intimidate people into silence and to buy favours, to spread police smears and the securuty agenda, to make five Prime Ministers (at least) and ten or more governments and parliaments accede to his political agenda.
The thought of Fox News going off-air and Bill O'Reilly losing his job is most arousing.
I already do. Well, selected journalism and comment pieces online anyway, as I do the Independent, the Mail, the Telegraph, The Morning Star and so on. Continue to pickle in the jouissance of self-loathing and other stimulants of choice you Sun reading thick tosser.
Jay Eisenhofer, a corporate governance lawyer representing shareholders bringing the lawsuit, told The Daily Telegraph: “Rupert and James are being sued directly for what they did. They have a direct legal obligation to shareholders and they neglected that. They are personally responsible.”
Confirmed now.
Tweeted by 'David Rose'.