Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Many dead in coordinated Paris shootings and explosions

Status
Not open for further replies.
From the perspective of the authorities, it's rational. It means that they can clear the streets in short order, then execute the shooters - or not - with little oversight, and little danger of any legal comeback.

Executing the people doing the killing will not really be the priority, and legal comeback or not at this point is not even going to be a consideration. Keeping the situation contained, treating the injured, stopping anyone else being killed, and trying to ensure the safety of any hostages that have been taken will. A State of Emergency helps that.
 
Executing the people doing the killing will not really be the priority, and legal comeback or not at this point is not even going to be a consideration. Keeping the situation contained, treating the injured, stopping anyone else being killed, and trying to ensure the safety of any hostages that have been taken will. A State of Emergency helps that.
It's on-going. I don't see what else they can do but declare a state of emergency. That's what it is.
 
Nothing's confirmed. But several reports are suggesting that at least some of the gunmen shouted 'Allahu Akbar' before opening fire, and let's face it, Daesh and their like have form for this sort of thing...

No i know daesh the most likely option but wanted to check that all other options were ruled out.
 
I suppose the decision to launch an assault on the Bataclan was more straight-forward than in most siege situations? With so many slaughtered already...nothing to be gained by conventional wait/negotiation?
 
I suppose the decision to launch an assault on the Bataclan was more straight-forward than in most siege situations? With so many slaughtered already...nothing to be gained by conventional wait/negotiation?

Seems like it, doesn't it? Limit to the numbers a bomber can take out.
 
Executing the people doing the killing will not really be the priority, and legal comeback or not at this point is not even going to be a consideration. Keeping the situation contained, treating the injured, stopping anyone else being killed, and trying to ensure the safety of any hostages that have been taken will. A State of Emergency helps that.

Which is why I said "...execute the shooters - or not...".
 
I suppose the decision to launch an assault on the Bataclan was more straight-forward than in most siege situations? With so many slaughtered already...nothing to be gained by conventional wait/negotiation?

Quite possibly. They'll be no time to properly plan and rehearse an assault, often they'll do a hasty plan, quick briefing, and get in there quick and very, very forcefully in circumstances like this.
 
I suppose the decision to launch an assault on the Bataclan was more straight-forward than in most siege situations? With so many slaughtered already...nothing to be gained by conventional wait/negotiation?
And more so if the reports on ongoing killing by the attackers are true.
 
I suppose the decision to launch an assault on the Bataclan was more straight-forward than in most siege situations? With so many slaughtered already...nothing to be gained by conventional wait/negotiation?

Probably. If some of the stuff doing the rounds on Twitter is to be believed there wouldn't have been much hope for most of the people in there if they'd left it, so from their pov better to take the risk of storming it. One report suggesting people are coming out now.
 
A few more of these and it will be the end of democracy in Europe. I don't say that with any relish, or belief that some kind of shadowy group or intelligence service is doing it - I don't. Just look at Israel... five years ago you could hold leftist anti-war demonstrations there now you can't because they are attacked while the police do not intervene, that's our future unless something changes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom