We go through the safer spaces policy very thoroughly.
Ok you’re lying and being a dick. You definitely have no clue about HSE law though.
We go through the safer spaces policy very thoroughly.
What kind of induction process are on these sites? None?
Hi vis is not mandatory on most small sites, I've been working in construction on small and big sites as a site manager, PM and on the tools for 20 years (till last August).
Will not wearing it possibly affect a claim? Maybe, maybe not.
No there probably isn't an induction, or decent welfare, or fire drills, or mandatory PPE of other sorts.
Now can you please go back to discussing the bookfair and I'll go back to lurking.
Just because you can say you’re not following rules doesn’t mean they don’t exist. No induction?
Just because you can say you’re not following rules doesn’t mean they don’t exist. No induction?
So a handyman puts up a shelf and has to wear hi viz?
My money's on 30 pages on hi-viz. Could be the mother of all derails.
Dunno. There’s the bog, there’s the tea bags, there’s the safer space...
Read the regs.
Or rather,
There’s the gender fluid bog, there’s the ethically resourced tea bags..
It’s mostly a cunt when you have to wear a hard hat to work above a false ceiling in the middle of summer finishing snagging in a room that office types will work in a week later sans any protection at all. The mind boggles.
Just because you can say you’re not following rules doesn’t mean they don’t exist. No induction?
Ruling the scene, the final prize.
I agree, I look forward to it starting up again. Glad to see local bookfairs and gatherings have taken off elsewhere too, I hope these continue rather than effort concentrates just on the London one. Not entirely anarchist groups and speakers have long been given space in the past - IWW and other Syndicalist groups (e.g. Education Workers Network), AFA, Jewish Socialist Group. I guess the difference between these groups and SPGB, ICC etc, is a matter of the degree of overlap with them and social anarchists, the willingness to work together, rather than be 'won over'.
I notice that SolFed, AFN and IWW are amongst those that haven't signed up yet - is there an organisational reason for this, or have they not yet go round to responding....?
Call it / radical / autonomous bookfair i reckon.
There’s no hierarchy above... identity politics. What a mess.
RIP.
Despite some people feeling we are not "Anarchist" because of our position on bigotry, we are an Anarchist Bookfair.
We didn't really want to call it Anarchist Bookfair / London Anarchist Bookfair quite yet incase the LABC forwhatever reason decided not to endorse or support us in taking them up on their offer from 2018. We would continue on simply as another Anarchist bookfair in london and felt it would be disingenuous to create further confusion with the name. Bookfair 2020 seemed like a reasonable leap.
Other bookfairs have used Radical / Autonomous and that's cool. Our decision not too is more to our own personal take and perhaps a degree of feeling that it implies we are an open space to other "radicals" such as the maoists or something or liberals like idk the Corbynistas. Tho honestly we didn't discuss it too much as at the end of the day Bookfair 2020 is perfectly servicable and it's just a name. If the LABC folk decided to give us support / join us, we can probably expect it to change back, if not, thats cool, no stresses or judgement on them.
We as individuals and by extention I suppose the collective, do not endorse cross class politics / IdPol. This doesn't mean we can willfully ignore or negate the inequalites in our society.
Fighting racism and sexism is essential to class struggle and tho this means sometimes organising based on these lines (such as anti fascist actions or kicking off with MRA fucks) at the end of the day what unites these struggles is the need to defeat capitalism and end the fucking poison of the state.
I reckon it's pretty bad form to negate the fucked up shit gay people go through by discounting any organsing along sexuality lines or banning homophobes from events as IdPol. (not saying anyone on thread is doing this but sadly fellow Anarchists sometimes do as I'm sure we're all aware)
If you see us inviting the Gay Police Association or some shit then yeah cuss us out as IdPol Liberals and take away our Anarchy badges.
there's standing for election to take part in the political process should one win and standing for election as a stunt. and cw's very much the latter, from the time when cw stood in kensington in 1988 up to the present. being as cw have been prominent in organising against elections, as in the '92 anti-election alliance, it seems perverse to say they're not anarchists on the basis they occasionally put forward candidates for their own political as opposed to electoral goals.Rhyddical
I know you've sort of addressed this, but I think it deserves further discussion.
What exactly are the grounds for invites vs. exclusion in the book fair?
There's a number of nin-anarchist groups on the list already.
Plan C, for example, who I quite like have put our pro-Labour Party stuff, and at a glance appear to be quite sympathetic to Kurdish nationalism.
Class War, who stand for election.
Animal rights groups? Why?
My own opinion is that I don't particularly mind. I don't especially identify as an Anarchist anymore, so it's cool with me....
...but then I'm not putting on an Anarchist Book fair. How are you you going to deal with groups who feel they have just as much a claim as say Plan C but who might be less welcome?
Be good to see some increased clarity.
Good luck, I look forward to coming along in 2020.
there's standing for election to take part in the political process should one win and standing for election as a stunt. and cw's very much the latter, from the time when cw stood in kensington in 1988 up to the present. being as cw have been prominent in organising against elections, as in the '92 anti-election alliance, it seems perverse to say they're not anarchists on the basis they occasionally put forward candidates for their own political as opposed to electoral goals.