Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
yeh he's covering the conference for the wiener abendblattMax schadenfreude.
yeh he's covering the conference for the wiener abendblattMax schadenfreude.
So she's a liar and a disloyal friend, as well as everything else. Scum.Not got to that bit yet. But interestingly she has thrown Kwarteng under the bus for the first time and said the upper tax rate thing was his idea and his alone.
There may be something in that. I too have a tendency to answer a question immediately, which can lead to me imparting far more personal information than anyone needs. No stop valve. Occasionally, it's resulted in looks of total horror descending over professional situations. Taking a pause can work out for the best.While totally agreeing with the general sentiment, pretty much despite her seeming lack of intellect she has managed to work her way to the top of the tree, so she must have some kind of... I dunno, political nous or something.
Even saying that, it does still seem hard to fathom when looking at any of the evidence.
Funnily enough, for a while I've been wondering if I should do something like that, taking a moment to pause and properly process the info/question before responding, as otherwise I can often answer in a way that's not actually very helpful/relevant.
It's hard to go against the general conversational conventions that generally dictate an uninterrupted rhythm, though.
Again, not necessarily defending Truss, but just one of those things I find interesting to reconsider.
I don't think her "Man in the room next door" has quite got a grasp on parroting a response in her ear piece from the Central Office approved response playbook.Why does she do the silence thing? Do you think it's some kinda power move or she is as I suspect, just not bright enough to have preempted what would be asked or react on the spot. Even Johnson would bloviate his way past any slightly awkward questions.
There may be something in that. I too have a tendency to answer a question immediately, which can lead to me imparting far more personal information than anyone needs. No stop valve. Occasionally, it's resulted in looks of total horror descending over professional situations. Taking a pause can work out for the best.
Perhaps Liz Truss is simply taking the time to remind herself not to tell the interviewer that she's been up all night with cystitis, before drawing parallels between herself to some character from a favourite film, and mentioning how she was inspired into a particular policy by helping with her child's geography homework.
If she's likely to do that kind of thing, coming across as somewhat mechanical and plodding might be preferable.
Na, slick wouldn't have done it (but he knows what he is talking about), savvy admitting a bit of learning going on.I get your point. But she's effectively a salesperson. She's gotta be slick. She's not. She's a massive electoral liability which is brilliant in its own way.
Christ. Just catching up on her performance on Kuennsberg this morning. Toe curling. She is actually very very thick isnt she.
Oh absolutely. She's a massive cunt, which can work, but not without charisma - and we've never had a leader with less. She's fucked. Unfortunately, so are we.I get your point. But she's effectively a salesperson. She's gotta be slick. She's not. She's a massive electoral liability which is brilliant in its own way.
I'm not sure she will. She clearly has no idea what she's doing and has nothing going for her. The local radio interviews this week showed she's got no idea how to manage the criticism.
I think the Tories will look at ways to reverse these new polling trends but that may involve getting rid of her.
It’s the next wave, when she gets involved in the ukraine situation, we really need to worry about.
Truss will ride this wave, but Kwarteng won’t. He’ll be long gone before the OBR announce their conclusions in November.I genuinely think she knows what she's doing, yes she's not very able but she has a handle on the ideas of Hayek.
She has politics, but those politics are of the extreme libertarians.
I have to dig out Nancy Maclean's book Democracy in chains.
Sorry for the Monbiot link A despot in disguise: one man’s mission to rip up democracy | George Monbiot
Some interesting stuff in that article.‘Liz Truss hasn’t understood a word I wrote’, says PM’s favourite author
As I reported this summer, Liz Truss’s favourite historian is Rick Perlstein, the great chronicler of the rise of the new right in its Nixonian and Reaganite forms between 1960 and 1980. She told journalists that she read ‘anything’ he wrote. Interviewers noticed Perlstein’s books on her...www.spectator.co.uk
If only.The charisma of Gordon Brown combined with the brilliance of Boris Johnson
Very interesting article. ThanksSome interesting stuff in that article.
This - In the 1970s, Irving Kristol, the editor of Public Interest, was explicit that politics must trump economics. The political advantage tax cuts would provide to the Republicans was so historically imperative they should be blasted through whatever the effect on the budget. ‘The neo-Conservative is willing to leave those problems to be coped with by liberal interregnums,’ he wrote in the Wall Street Journal. ‘He wants to shape the future and will leave it to his opponents to tidy up afterwards.’ - seems horribly familiar in the UK too.
This, Perlstein describing the source Liz Truss relies on for her economic philosophy - [It was] devised by a dude whose only economic training, in his own description, came from learning to count cards at the blackjack tables in Las Vegas. I wish I were making this up, but I'm not. - is genuinely terrifying.
The charisma of Gordon Brown combined with the brilliance of Boris Johnson
Kwasi Kwarteng ‘to bring forward planned fiscal statement’ in another U-turn – as it happened
Guardian understands chancellor will make statement later this month, rather than in November as originally plannedwww.theguardian.com
Sure this will help their election chances.
Are you in the cabinet?She’ll also reverse abolishing the 45% tax rate, because that will score the most political points whilst affecting the fewest voters,
Quite. I don’t think it will help much, it’ll just add to the general sense that they don’t know what they’re doingWill "the markets" and the various financial institutions be at all settled by this though? As I understand it, the 45p rate change was responsible for only a small fraction (£1 or 2 billion out of the £45 billion) of the drop in tax income. The bulk of it is in the 20p rate drop.
IIRC none of the market volatility last week was remotely connected with the fiscal event; it was all down to global market volatility.Quite. I don’t think it will help much, it’ll just add to the general sense that they don’t know what they’re doing
Will "the markets" and the various financial institutions be at all settled by this though? As I understand it, the 45p rate change was responsible for only a small fraction (£1 or 2 billion out of the £45 billion) of the drop in tax income. The bulk of it is in the 20p rate drop.
Will "the markets" and the various financial institutions be at all settled by this though? As I understand it, the 45p rate change was responsible for only a small fraction (£1 or 2 billion out of the £45 billion) of the drop in tax income. The bulk of it is in the 20p rate drop.
Despite this morning’s U-turn, the damage in the bond market is still clearly visible, says Ben Laidler, global markets strategist at social investment network eToro
The UK government has bowed to the dramatic pressure from the financial markets today. Shelving the top rate of income tax cut provides short term relief to hard pressed Sterling and UK bond markets, but the government is not out of the woods yet with the vast majority of its unfunded spending plans still intact, from cuts to national insurance and basic income tax, to corporation tax and alcohol.
“Much of the damage from last week is also still visible, with 10-year bond yields up by a quarter from early September and by half from August, implying higher costs for all borrowers.”
Will "the markets" and the various financial institutions be at all settled by this though? As I understand it, the 45p rate change was responsible for only a small fraction (£1 or 2 billion out of the £45 billion) of the drop in tax income. The bulk of it is in the 20p rate drop.
people will just call for a GE if they go through another campaign.I think a lot of the damage has already been done. This was actually a relatively small part of the whole shitshow they announced but showing that level of incompetence in a) announcing it and b) reversing it is what will have spooked global investors
Edit: The markets obvs dont actually give a fuck about the morals or otherwise of Truss/Kwarteng's plan. They're pragmatic. I think only a change of leadership will reduce the damage. Surely even Tories can see that.