Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Laurence Fox. The twat.

Multiple times a day at the moment. It’s not always an easy watch at times, it’s incredible to see how quickly someone can fall down the various rabbit holes.
Case in point: Matt Le Tissier. Imagine being a Saints fan who grew up in the '90s and seeing your hero turn into...that.

ETA: Lozza is having a go at drug addicts? Despite bragging about being a cokehead himself?!
 
I bet he loathes the fact that a woman from a working-class background has ended up with the kind of money he was born into (if not more). And that she's really popular whilst he's known as some try-hard wannabe edgy knobhead who spouts a load of bollocks, and could no longer even get work as an extra on the kind of productions she stars in.
This is what gets me about him doing a Paul Embery and claiming to speak for all working-class people and assuming all working-class people are bigots like him. He certainly doesn't care about his working-class ex-wife. Called her 'common', apparently. Lozza's attempt at being a class warrior is even less convincing than Graham Linehan's, and this is considering that Linehan is currently in Oz on an all-expenses-paid Free Speech Union jolly. (Cunt still won't stop tweeting though.)

ETA: jibby jab? Is he five? He's not exactly a picture of health, think I'll take my chances with the ol' needle.
 
🤣🤣🤣

Loser's team hands in his nomination to be a candidate in the London Mayoral election just before the deadline yesterday. Mayoral nominations require the signatures of 330 people who are on the London electoral rolls. Ten from each of the Boroughs and the City of London. One Borough's paperwork is one elector short. Three other signatories can't be matched to the electoral rolls for their Boroughs.

Loser is not going to be standing for Mayor.

The £25 grand paid towards the nomination, and towards the cost of the booklet that is produced containing statements from candidates, is to be refunded.

Including the £5 grand he's accidentally overpaid.

His nomination for election as an assembly member is accepted.

Loser is unhappy. That rotter Sadiq Khan has swizzled him again. It's so beastly unfair.


Loser: ''Waaaah Waaaah Waaaah''


Laurence Fox @LozzaFox

We checked, double checked and then triple checked our nominations, because we knew they would try this.

The team made sure that every box was ticked, every t crossed and every i dotted.

We will appeal this decision.

This is pure political corruption by ©SadiqKhan and his minions.

What an embarrassment the open corruption in this country is.

I got 1.9% last time. Why is he so keen to shut me up? Because he’s a crook, that’s why.

Community note about how the election of ©SadiqKhan is not about block mail in ballots and how he has NOTHING to do with electoral processes.

It’s a sham. If I was a threat then fine, but I’m not even a threat.

I would have stood to abolish his job. I would have made it a referendum on him. Craven, money grabbing, globalist shill.

9.17PM Mar 27 2024 -- link to x-tweet


20:03

Gordon, Rob,

We have now checked the 330 subscribers supplied with your candidate's nomination that you brought to City Hall earlier this afternoon; shortly before the 4pm deadline.

The Islington and Lambeth nomination papers only had nine valid subscribers, not the required ten. Three further subscribers for other boroughs could not be reconciled to voter register records.

The mayoral nomination is therefore not valid, and the earlier issues relating to the booklet set out below no longer arise.

I confirm that Mr Fox’s nomination as a London-wide Assembly member candidate is valid.

We will therefore repay the £20k paid in respect of the booklet and the mayoral nomination; as well as the £5k overpaid by you in error. We are retaining the £5k deposit paid in respect of the London-wide Assembly member nomination.

Please do not hesitate to contact me or Lea ccd if you have any questions.

Regards,

Alex

Alex Conway, Deputy Greater London Returning Officer
GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY


Anna Falactick: ''At least you will be able to pay half of your child support backlog hun x''


Anna Falactick @PetulantWench
At least you will be able to pay half of your child support backlog hun x
9.33PM Mar 27 2024 -- x-twitter link
 
🤣🤣🤣

Loser's team hands in his nomination to be a candidate in the London Mayoral election just before the deadline yesterday. Mayoral nominations require the signatures of 330 people who are on the London electoral rolls. Ten from each of the Boroughs and the City of London. One Borough's paperwork is one elector short. Three other signatories can't be matched to the electoral rolls for their Boroughs.

Loser is not going to be standing for Mayor.

The £25 grand paid towards the nomination, and towards the cost of the booklet that is produced containing statements from candidates, is to be refunded.

Including the £5 grand he's accidentally overpaid.

His nomination for election as an assembly member is accepted.

Loser is unhappy. That rotter Sadiq Khan has swizzled him again. It's so beastly unfair.


Loser: ''Waaaah Waaaah Waaaah''''Waaaah Waaaah Waaaah''


Laurence Fox @LozzaFox

We checked, double checked and then triple checked our nominations, because we knew they would try this.

The team made sure that every box was ticked, every t crossed and every i dotted.

We will appeal this decision.

This is pure political corruption by ©SadiqKhan and his minions.

What an embarrassment the open corruption in this country is.

I got 1.9% last time. Why is he so keen to shut me up? Because he’s a crook, that’s why.

Community note about how the election of ©SadiqKhan is not about block mail in ballots and how he has NOTHING to do with electoral processes.

It’s a sham. If I was a threat then fine, but I’m not even a threat.

I would have stood to abolish his job. I would have made it a referendum on him. Craven, money grabbing, globalist shill.

9.17PM Mar 27 2024 -- link to x-tweet


20:03

Gordon, Rob,

We have now checked the 330 subscribers supplied with your candidate's nomination that you brought to City Hall earlier this afternoon; shortly before the 4pm deadline.

The Islington and Lambeth nomination papers only had nine valid subscribers, not the required ten. Three further subscribers for other boroughs could not be reconciled to voter register records.

The mayoral nomination is therefore not valid, and the earlier issues relating to the booklet set out below no longer arise.

I confirm that Mr Fox’s nomination as a London-wide Assembly member candidate is valid.

We will therefore repay the £20k paid in respect of the booklet and the mayoral nomination; as well as the £5k overpaid by you in error. We are retaining the £5k deposit paid in respect of the London-wide Assembly member nomination.

Please do not hesitate to contact me or Lea ccd if you have any questions.

Regards,

Alex

Alex Conway, Deputy Greater London Returning Officer
GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY


Anna Falactick: ''At least you will be able to pay half of your child support backlog hun x''''At least you will be able to pay half of your child support backlog hun x''


Anna Falactick @PetulantWench
At least you will be able to pay half of your child support backlog hun x
9.33PM Mar 27 2024 -- x-twitter link
 
Personally, I think there are two options
Option 1: He's too stupid to fill in the forms correctly, or if they are that complicated, and he's too unaware of his lack of abilities and hire someone else to do it. Perhaps some of the subscribers are FotL types who are not on the Electoral Roll.

Option 2: He deliberately messed up the forms so he could play the victim and possibly grift more money from his followers

and I think option 2
 
A bit of basic rushing-for-the-deadline administrative ineptitude on his part. Quite a leap to make that part of Sadiq Khan's evil plot against him but par for the course in his world though. Poor poor Laurence.
 
Back
Top Bottom