Laurence Fox. The twat.

[krtek a houby]

Not so much
View attachment 401499

Fox is more of a creeping, dreadful horror

 

[Pickman's model]

Fox is more of a creeping, dreadful horror

The dull-wit horror

 

[Serge Forward]

Though Lovecraft was a bit of a fash too. I'm sure they could have been friends

 

[Pickman's model]

Though Lovecraft was a bit of a fash too. I'm sure they could have been friends

I think hpl would have despised fox as a vapid wanker

 

[LeytonCatLady]

 

[steveo87]

View attachment 401481

Good to see Bowser the Law Dog is still on the bar.

 

[Dogsauce]

View attachment 401481

I think I have an idea who the court sketch artist might be…

 

[xenon]

"Chewbacca as angry, haunted 40-year old with a shave and combover from 1982, nursing half a pint in a courtroom, flanked by people hastily recycled from their own body parts" on Craiyon

I didn’t get the picture but I love this description.

 

[seeformiles]

Funny court drawing

View attachment 401435

It’s like a fire in Madame Tussaud’s

 

[LeytonCatLady]

It’s like a fire in Madame Tussaud’s

And everyone's invited!

 

[scalyboy]

Yeah, so colour blind he gets offended when he sees an Asian person in a World War I film.

Good point. And hopefully one that Blake's and Crystal's brief will pick up on, and use in their defence against the odious twat.

I was also musing: if he loses this case, will it then be OK to publicly label him a racist? In which case, and since English law is (as I understand it to be) based on precedent, Mukhtar's case would be as good as won even before entering the court room, and the deluded toff would have to settle out of court.

Solid gold! This one made me literally LOL - again.
I know I keep saying this LCL, but your bon mots (or les mots juste?) putting the verbal boot into 'Lozza' get better and better. I still can't work out why he hasn't blocked you - could it be some sort of weird masochistic thing that the upper classes are into?

 

[LeytonCatLady]

Good point. And hopefully one that Blake's and Crystal's brief will pick up on, and use in their defence against the odious twat.

I was also musing: if he loses this case, will it then be OK to publicly label him a racist? In which case, and since English law is (as I understand it to be) based on precedent, Mukhtar's case would be as good as won even before entering the court room, and the deluded toff would have to settle out of court.


Solid gold! This one made me literally LOL - again.
I know I keep saying this LCL, but your bon mots (or les mots juste?) putting the verbal boot into 'Lozza' get better and better. I still can't work out why he hasn't blocked you - could it be some sort of weird masochistic thing that the upper classes are into?

Maybe he feels blocking me would be "letting the plebs win". Dunno really, but I intend to make the most of it.

 

[equationgirl]

If he is found by the libel case to be a racist (despite his woeful attempts to prove otherwise via his girlfriend and his best friend) then unless the case is overturned on appeal, I think it would be acceptable to describe him as such.

 

[PR1Berske]

He may have muted LeytonCatLady , so he never sees the responses. Of course my worry is that he's collecting responses for evidence gathering.

 

[LeytonCatLady]

If he is found by the libel case to be a racist (despite his woeful attempts to prove otherwise via his girlfriend and his best friend) then unless the case is overturned on appeal, I think it would be acceptable to describe him as such.

I think it's acceptable to describe him that way anyway. Someone on Twitter objected to one of my replies to him (the one where I pointed out he only mentions women's rights or gay rights when it's an opportunity to be transphobic). I won't screenshot the conversation as it's long but, to summarise:

RANDOM TWITTER WANKER: "There's no such thing as transgender, it's called Gender Dysphoria and it's a mental illness."
ME: "Regardless of terminology, when have you ever seen Laurence Fox defend women's rights or gay rights without it having anything to do with transgender people?"
RTW (not actually answering my question): "Perhaps that's because he views transgenderism as harmful to men, women and children. Defending women's rights and gay rights are not explicitly excluded because of his views on trans issues. Fox is consistent in his views about equality and the right to free speech."
ME: "Yeah, so consistent about free speech he sues people who call him racist. And such a supporter of women's rights he thinks having an abortion is comparable to rape."
RTW: "Accusing someone of being a racist is not free speech, it is libel, as it would be if I called you a paedophile and you weren't."
ME: "It's not libel if the person believes it's true. If he doesn't want to be called a racist, he should stop acting like one."

 

[Dystopiary]

RTW: "Accusing someone of being a racist is not free speech, it is libel, as it would be if I called you a paedophile and you weren't."

Which is exactly why the twit Fox finds himself in court!

 

[Kaka Tim]

evidence that the person fox called a padeo is a padeo - none whatsoever
evidence that fox is a racist ... fuck me, how long have you got?

 

[editor]

This is still a great primer for UK libel laws

Basic UK libel law for idiots by Adam Porter

Basic UK libel law for idiots, urban75, one of the UK's busiest online magazines featuring photography, short stories and useless games!

www.urban75.org

 

[LeytonCatLady]

He may have muted LeytonCatLady , so he never sees the responses. Of course my worry is that he's collecting responses for evidence gathering.

What's he going to do, give me lines?

 

[Lurdan]

What's he going to do, give me lines?

He's already giving you feed lines.

 

[PR1Berske]

What's he going to do, give me lines?

Fair point well made

 

[SpookyFrank]

He may have muted LeytonCatLady , so he never sees the responses. Of course my worry is that he's collecting responses for evidence gathering.

Considering Fox's current backlog of court cases I reckon LeytonCatLady can expect to be hearing from his lawyers in about 90 years' time.

 

[LeytonCatLady]

Fair point well made

I reckon the worst he'll do is ring my mum to tell her how cheeky I've been.

 

[LeytonCatLady]

Considering Fox's current backlog of court cases I reckon LeytonCatLady can expect to be hearing from his lawyers in about 90 years' time.

Perfect. I'll be an old lady of 127 by then, so I can get a lighter sentence on the grounds of death.

 

[Puddy_Tat]

I reckon the worst he'll do is ring my mum to tell her how cheeky I've been.

hmm.

dunno. he might decide to sue you, especially if he manages to win this case.

or some of his dubious chums / followers might recognise you in the street...

 

[LeytonCatLady]

hmm.

dunno. he might decide to sue you, especially if he manages to win this case.

or some of his dubious chums / followers might recognise you in the street...

I'll have probably changed my hair colour again by then.

 

[Dystopiary]

hmm.

dunno. he might decide to sue you, especially if he manages to win this case.

or some of his dubious chums / followers might recognise you in the street...

If they dare to harass LeytonCatLady I'll [REDACTED].

I will though.

 

[LeytonCatLady]

If they dare to harass LeytonCatLady I'll [REDACTED].

I will though.

Awww, thanks for the support Dystopiary. I'll be fine though, I've handled nastier people than Looza and his minions.

 

[krtek a houby]

A lot of these right wing bastions of free speech are quite delicate when it's perceived to be used against them.

Or maybe they see the courtroom as another platform to sell their disingenuous messages.

 

[LeytonCatLady]

A lot of these right wing bastions of free speech are quite delicate when it's perceived to be used against them.

Or maybe they see the courtroom as another platform to sell their disingenuous messages.

Classic libertarian attitude innit. "Freedom of speech for me, but not for thee!"