Treacle Toes
Time
‘white lives don’t matter’ (to quote that posh Cambridge woman)
Genius
'White lives don't matter'...as White lives...' meaning it's not just being 'White' that makes a life matter...as well you know.
‘white lives don’t matter’ (to quote that posh Cambridge woman)
Genius
Dismissing allegations of anti-semitism with "proven links to the Israeli Embassy". There's a word for that.The JLM has to my knowledge proven links to the Israeli Embassy
In the opinion of many Jews (myself included) he patently is. Not that that's the core issue here.he patently isn’t.
Any breakaway party will also have consistent accusations of antisemitism at it by media and labour right wing whether true or not. Permanent feature for the left I'd say now, it's been so successful.
I still don't understand what you mean.This attitude is working out so well for the left isn’t it
^ really dodgy views.to you it does. The constant insult to white patients of the NHS, and the constant ‘NHS Heroes, this is why we beat the Nazis, had windrush etc’ will not end well
setting up BAME staff as ‘heroes’, BAME patients as ‘victims’ and white people as the enemy will not end well.
The report protects non-anti-Semitic criticism of Israel. But while I reckon most of us on here would agree where the line is crossed when putting forward anti-Zionist ideas, the Israeli government of course disagrees. It wants 'anti-Zionist' and 'anti-Semitic' to be considered synonyms. It's pretty explicit about that.
As from around 20:50 in this, the Israeli ambassador to the UN gives the Israeli government's self-serving understanding of anti-Semitism.
'using different language when they speak about Israel'
'You can criticise Israel, absolutely, but don't criticise only Israel'
'this obsession, it comes from somewhere'
HARDtalk - Israel’s ambassador to the UN - Danny Danon - BBC Sounds
That's essentially the battleground now. How come you're singling out Israel? That's anti-Semitic.
Yes, and when I say that I dislike the idea of a 'Jewish state', I actually am always careful to add that I also dislike the idea of an Islamic state or a Christian state or a Hindu state. Those who push such ideas are invariably reactionary, exclusionary forces. I'd like to see the world moving beyond that.That's doable though I think. It's good to criticize China's disgusting repression and killing of Uighurs alongside Saudi Arabia's disgusting repression and killing of Yemenis alongside Israel's disgusting repression and killing of Palestinians.
Abso-lucking-futely.How come you're singling out Israel? That's anti-Semitic.
I didn’t have to mention Angola when criticising apartheid South Africa so I’m fucked if I need to mention other places when criticising apartheid Israel.
It's an inherently piss-weak argument of course. 'How come you're singling us out?' is a tacit acknowledgement that there is merit to the critcism.I didn’t have to mention Angola when criticising apartheid South Africa so I’m fucked if I need to mention other places when criticising apartheid Israel.
Oh look, the point went thaattaway!It's an inherently piss-weak argument of course. 'How come you're singling us out?' is a tacit acknowledgement that there is merit to the critcism.
No, I understand the point. But it is used, and in the case of the Israeli governement massively abused, to shut down criticism of appalling behaviour.Oh look, the point went thaattaway!
Tend to agree; that and the whole issue of any attempt to establish the scale of the problem within the party. The logic of the grounds given for Corbyn's suspension would suggest that any questioning of the claims of the extent of Labour's antisemitism must be judged to constitute antisemitism. Could be a problem for Starmer if he starts to promote the idea that he has made progress in cleaning the Augean stables.That's essentially the battleground now. How come you're singling out Israel? That's anti-Semitic.
Well that's where Starmer the forensic lawyer is in a mess, isn't he? The report explicitly mentions protection of the right to criticise the israeli government and the right to disagree as to the extent and nature of the problem of anti-Semitism within the Labour party.Tend to agree; that and the whole issue of any attempt to establish the scale of the problem within the party. The logic of the grounds given for Corbyn's suspension would suggest that any questioning of the claims of the extent of Labour's antisemitism must be judged to constitute antisemitism. Could be a problem for Starmer if he starts to promote the idea that he has made progress in cleaning the Augean stables.
Do you have a problem with the BLM movement?
Dangerous (for Starmer) precedent has been set.Well that's where Starmer the forensic lawyer is in a mess, isn't he? The report explicitly mentions protection of the right to criticise the israeli government and the right to disagree as to the extent and nature of the problem of anti-Semitism within the Labour party.
Okay, so you don't like BLM, thanks for letting us know via a link (which I didn't open) to that well-known journalistic bastion of antiracism, The Daily Mail.No I think it’s entirely innocuous
BLM accused of anti-Semitism after posting photo of mural
The controversial mural, 'Freedom of Humanity', was posted online by Black Lives Matter Oxford as a cover photo on Facebook for an event.www.dailymail.co.uk
Okay, so you don't like BLM, thanks for letting us know via a link (which I didn't open) to that well-known journalistic bastion of antiracism, The Daily Mail.
The same one which smeared Milliband senior as anti-British.
What about the rest of your dodgy comments?
Israel (not you) is criticised for creating a homeland by dispossessing the people who already lived there. It created that homeland by using the tactics it now condemns when used against them. It set up an explicitly racist state where the Arab population that was allowed to remain are third class citizens. And it did all that with the explicit help and support of the British state (even while the gangs were killing British squaddies).Abso-lucking-futely.
Israel is culpable for an awful lot of ethno-vile shit. But nothing that isn't also seen in India (Kashmir), China, Burma, Sri Lanka and the US. Those just off the top of my head. The left protests Israel at a volume out of all proportion to those others. As a people persecuted over centuries for not having a homeland, we call bullshit on now being persecuted for having a homeland.
Did you read your own link?Sorry you’re right. I should be linking to the Canary or some other ‘really’ anti-racist media.
Do you think the anti-Jewish animus present in BLM is linked an anti-white animus?
The group has now taken down the picture from the event and tweeted an apology.
A statement said: 'We understand that recently an antisemitic image was used on one of our events. This is deeply concerning and the person who used the image is deeply sorry. We absolutely do not condone the image used and have since removed it.
'We will use this time to learn from their mistakes and ensure every person who attends our events feels safe. We stand resolutely against antisemitism, and see our struggles for liberation as interconnected.'
Alexander Kantor, who had called for the picture to be taken down said the 'apologies appreciated and accepted.'
She added: 'I do not think they have an issue with anti-Semitism, it was a case of not being aware and they have learnt from it and took action on their staff members to ensure this does not happen again.'
'Mistakes can happen and become opportunities to learn and educate ourselves. It is quite rare to receive an honest and meaningful apology, as well as actions to ensure this won't happen again.
'Apologies appreciated and accepted, but this is not about me […]. I am an ally, I am very glad about their public statement. UK BLM should learn from them.' morning
No. I am opposing a state and it’s actions not an ethnicity or a religion. And I can oppose several governments at the same time, whilst mentioning them all individually.belboid yes of course the specifics for Israel are specific to Israel. The ethnic oppression issues are common to all of those. And you're finding reasons to dump exclusively on Jews.
Aren't you mirroring the mistake made by anti-Semitic critics of Israel - namely conflating 'Israel/Israeli' with 'Jews/Jewish'?belboid yes of course the specifics for Israel are specific to Israel. The ethnic oppression issues are common to all of those. And you're finding reasons to dump exclusively on Jews.
belboid yes of course the specifics for Israel are specific to Israel. The ethnic oppression issues are common to all of those. And you're finding reasons to dump exclusively on Jews.
Don't think that bit actually follows - you're still accusing the people more interested in Israel than elsewhere of making that conflation, doesn't matter if you do or don't, point is in their heads it's happening.Aren't you mirroring the mistake made by anti-Semitic critics of Israel - namely conflating 'Israel/Israeli' with 'Jews/Jewish'?
I'm calling it out, not mirroring it.Aren't you mirroring the mistake made by anti-Semitic critics of Israel - namely conflating 'Israel/Israeli' with 'Jews/Jewish'?