Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Labour & Anti-Semitism.

Any breakaway party will also have consistent accusations of antisemitism at it by media and labour right wing whether true or not. Permanent feature for the left I'd say now, it's been so successful.

The report protects non-anti-Semitic criticism of Israel. But while I reckon most of us on here would agree where the line is crossed when putting forward anti-Zionist ideas, the Israeli government of course disagrees. It wants 'anti-Zionist' and 'anti-Semitic' to be considered synonyms. It's pretty explicit about that.

As from around 20:50 in this, the Israeli ambassador to the UN gives the Israeli government's self-serving understanding of anti-Semitism.

'using different language when they speak about Israel'
'You can criticise Israel, absolutely, but don't criticise only Israel'
'this obsession, it comes from somewhere'

HARDtalk - Israel’s ambassador to the UN - Danny Danon - BBC Sounds

That's essentially the battleground now. How come you're singling out Israel? That's anti-Semitic.
 
to you it does. The constant insult to white patients of the NHS, and the constant ‘NHS Heroes, this is why we beat the Nazis, had windrush etc’ will not end well

setting up BAME staff as ‘heroes’, BAME patients as ‘victims’ and white people as the enemy will not end well.
^ really dodgy views.
 
The report protects non-anti-Semitic criticism of Israel. But while I reckon most of us on here would agree where the line is crossed when putting forward anti-Zionist ideas, the Israeli government of course disagrees. It wants 'anti-Zionist' and 'anti-Semitic' to be considered synonyms. It's pretty explicit about that.

As from around 20:50 in this, the Israeli ambassador to the UN gives the Israeli government's self-serving understanding of anti-Semitism.

'using different language when they speak about Israel'
'You can criticise Israel, absolutely, but don't criticise only Israel'
'this obsession, it comes from somewhere'

HARDtalk - Israel’s ambassador to the UN - Danny Danon - BBC Sounds

That's essentially the battleground now. How come you're singling out Israel? That's anti-Semitic.

That's doable though I think. It's good to criticize China's disgusting repression and killing of Uighurs alongside Saudi Arabia's disgusting repression and killing of Yemenis alongside Israel's disgusting repression and killing of Palestinians.
 
That's doable though I think. It's good to criticize China's disgusting repression and killing of Uighurs alongside Saudi Arabia's disgusting repression and killing of Yemenis alongside Israel's disgusting repression and killing of Palestinians.
Yes, and when I say that I dislike the idea of a 'Jewish state', I actually am always careful to add that I also dislike the idea of an Islamic state or a Christian state or a Hindu state. Those who push such ideas are invariably reactionary, exclusionary forces. I'd like to see the world moving beyond that.

But that interview with the ambassador provides an example of where I might get into trouble. He laughably states that Arab Israelis are equal citizens, nothing to see here. Setting aside the problems with that within Israel itself, it simply ignores the Arabs who have lived under Israeli domination since 1967. Making a comparison between the occupied territories and South Africa's bantustans quite quickly leads to howls of anti-Semitism.
 
How come you're singling out Israel? That's anti-Semitic.
Abso-lucking-futely.

Israel is culpable for an awful lot of ethno-vile shit. But nothing that isn't also seen in India (Kashmir), China, Burma, Sri Lanka and the US. Those just off the top of my head. The left protests Israel at a volume out of all proportion to those others. As a people persecuted over centuries for not having a homeland, we call bullshit on now being persecuted for having a homeland.
 
I didn’t have to mention Angola when criticising apartheid South Africa so I’m fucked if I need to mention other places when criticising apartheid Israel.

I quite like it - putting them alongside other repressive regimes puts it into perspective somewhat.
 
I didn’t have to mention Angola when criticising apartheid South Africa so I’m fucked if I need to mention other places when criticising apartheid Israel.
It's an inherently piss-weak argument of course. 'How come you're singling us out?' is a tacit acknowledgement that there is merit to the critcism.
 
That's essentially the battleground now. How come you're singling out Israel? That's anti-Semitic.
Tend to agree; that and the whole issue of any attempt to establish the scale of the problem within the party. The logic of the grounds given for Corbyn's suspension would suggest that any questioning of the claims of the extent of Labour's antisemitism must be judged to constitute antisemitism. Could be a problem for Starmer if he starts to promote the idea that he has made progress in cleaning the Augean stables.
 
Tend to agree; that and the whole issue of any attempt to establish the scale of the problem within the party. The logic of the grounds given for Corbyn's suspension would suggest that any questioning of the claims of the extent of Labour's antisemitism must be judged to constitute antisemitism. Could be a problem for Starmer if he starts to promote the idea that he has made progress in cleaning the Augean stables.
Well that's where Starmer the forensic lawyer is in a mess, isn't he? The report explicitly mentions protection of the right to criticise the israeli government and the right to disagree as to the extent and nature of the problem of anti-Semitism within the Labour party.
 
Well that's where Starmer the forensic lawyer is in a mess, isn't he? The report explicitly mentions protection of the right to criticise the israeli government and the right to disagree as to the extent and nature of the problem of anti-Semitism within the Labour party.
Dangerous (for Starmer) precedent has been set.
Starmer : after 12 months of tireless work to address this problem I have reduced antisemitism within the LP significantly.
Campaign Against Antisemitism : not according to our observations and files...& to say otherwise is antisemitic.
Starmer : I have suspended myself pending investigation...

The LP now always has to be antisemitic and to say otherwise....
 
No I think it’s entirely innocuous

Okay, so you don't like BLM, thanks for letting us know via a link (which I didn't open) to that well-known journalistic bastion of antiracism, The Daily Mail.

The same one which smeared Milliband senior as anti-British.

What about the rest of your dodgy comments?
 
Okay, so you don't like BLM, thanks for letting us know via a link (which I didn't open) to that well-known journalistic bastion of antiracism, The Daily Mail.

The same one which smeared Milliband senior as anti-British.

What about the rest of your dodgy comments?

Sorry you’re right. I should be linking to the Canary or some other ‘really’ anti-racist media.

Do you think the anti-Jewish animus present in BLM is linked an anti-white animus?
 
Abso-lucking-futely.

Israel is culpable for an awful lot of ethno-vile shit. But nothing that isn't also seen in India (Kashmir), China, Burma, Sri Lanka and the US. Those just off the top of my head. The left protests Israel at a volume out of all proportion to those others. As a people persecuted over centuries for not having a homeland, we call bullshit on now being persecuted for having a homeland.
Israel (not you) is criticised for creating a homeland by dispossessing the people who already lived there. It created that homeland by using the tactics it now condemns when used against them. It set up an explicitly racist state where the Arab population that was allowed to remain are third class citizens. And it did all that with the explicit help and support of the British state (even while the gangs were killing British squaddies).

those are fundamental differences with all the other examples you give. Oppression in many other states is indeed also appalling, but they don’t provide an excuse for not condemning Israeli violence, or - most importantly - it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t call for a complete boycott of Israeli goods and a stopping of military support.
 
Last edited:
Sorry you’re right. I should be linking to the Canary or some other ‘really’ anti-racist media.

Do you think the anti-Jewish animus present in BLM is linked an anti-white animus?
Did you read your own link?

I'm not going to defend using that mural, which I agree is very clearly anti-Semitic. However, neither is Oxford BLM...

The group has now taken down the picture from the event and tweeted an apology.

A statement said: 'We understand that recently an antisemitic image was used on one of our events. This is deeply concerning and the person who used the image is deeply sorry. We absolutely do not condone the image used and have since removed it.

'We will use this time to learn from their mistakes and ensure every person who attends our events feels safe. We stand resolutely against antisemitism, and see our struggles for liberation as interconnected.'

Alexander Kantor, who had called for the picture to be taken down said the 'apologies appreciated and accepted.'

She added: 'I do not think they have an issue with anti-Semitism, it was a case of not being aware and they have learnt from it and took action on their staff members to ensure this does not happen again.'

'Mistakes can happen and become opportunities to learn and educate ourselves. It is quite rare to receive an honest and meaningful apology, as well as actions to ensure this won't happen again.

'Apologies appreciated and accepted, but this is not about me […]. I am an ally, I am very glad about their public statement. UK BLM should learn from them.' morning
 
belboid yes of course the specifics for Israel are specific to Israel. The ethnic oppression issues are common to all of those. And you're finding reasons to dump exclusively on Jews.
 
BLM is decentralised like lots of movements - I've called out shit whether racist, classist, anti-semitic, and otherwise unhelpful, amongst people in various groups/actions I've been involved over the years. I've never seen such a movement not end up with that awkward rubbing up of different politics and positions under that, and unavoidably some pretty batshit and unpleasant stuff too - Occupy had exactly the same problem. And it needs people to call it out.

Regardless, how that ends up being extrapolated or conflated as a whole movement being a problem as implied above, I don't get. I mean, I got personally frustrated with seeing some of the anti-trans sentiment and broader 'iffy' views of some people who were particularly vocal around the social housing/Grenfell actions and because of that I held back a little from getting involved as I would have liked. However, its primary aims were sound as were many of the people involved, and as a decentralised set of groups/actions that is something that is difficult to escape sadly without it being challenged.

All of which is very different when applied to a political party structure and actions of its members. As we've seen through this whole sordid affair with Labour.

I'm unsure what is to be gained by channeling like a sub-Posie Parker either.
 
Last edited:
belboid yes of course the specifics for Israel are specific to Israel. The ethnic oppression issues are common to all of those. And you're finding reasons to dump exclusively on Jews.
No. I am opposing a state and it’s actions not an ethnicity or a religion. And I can oppose several governments at the same time, whilst mentioning them all individually.

you’re rationale sounds horribly similar to SA apartheid apologists who said ‘well the uk is racist too, and Angola’s really awful.’
 
You think it’s intentional in some way gsv the way that Israel’s crimes are much more energising to people than those other countries? I don’t think it’s at all that simple , don’t think anyone is consciously choosing to ‘dump on jews’ it’s more interesting than that, imo, but the level at which this conversation’s being had here is just basic as duck and not going to go anywhere imo.
 
belboid yes of course the specifics for Israel are specific to Israel. The ethnic oppression issues are common to all of those. And you're finding reasons to dump exclusively on Jews.
Aren't you mirroring the mistake made by anti-Semitic critics of Israel - namely conflating 'Israel/Israeli' with 'Jews/Jewish'?
 
I don't think it's intentional bimble, though I see it reads that way. I think some people* are in a centuries-old habit of considering Jews a legitimate target. And need to introspect that a little.

* absolutely includes JC and his bunch
 
belboid yes of course the specifics for Israel are specific to Israel. The ethnic oppression issues are common to all of those. And you're finding reasons to dump exclusively on Jews.

I've seen a few anti-semites talk about Israel but I've never seen any one of them express exclusive concern about the plight of Palestinians as opposed to eg. Uighurs or Kurds. They are much more interested in supposed Israeli influence. I'm willing to wager that in this country at least it is never about the threat posed to Arabs in a distant country and always the threat posed to themselves and people like them. Indeed, how else is demagogy supposed to work? But in any case where is the empirical basis that anti-semites are agitating against Jews by not talking about Uighurs and Kurds, how does this work, what are the real life examples?

I appreciate there can be a bit of monomania regarding Israel/Palestine with certain leftwingers. But then it's been a cause that has gestated for decades. you don't have to reach to explain that monomania. And whatever the problems may be with monomania, it isn't in itself a form racism. No more than the monomania with apartheid South Africa in the 80's was a form of racism.
 
Aren't you mirroring the mistake made by anti-Semitic critics of Israel - namely conflating 'Israel/Israeli' with 'Jews/Jewish'?
Don't think that bit actually follows - you're still accusing the people more interested in Israel than elsewhere of making that conflation, doesn't matter if you do or don't, point is in their heads it's happening.
 
Back
Top Bottom