Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
So, what's the change, is she now Elphicke Natalie?Her neighbour, Yvette Cooper said NE was a changed woman on R4 earlier.
So, what's the change, is she now Elphicke Natalie?Her neighbour, Yvette Cooper said NE was a changed woman on R4 earlier.
I appreciate it's unlikely to happen, but if Elphicke had a decent sense of humour she's got the chance to do something really funny here, now Starmer's rolled out the red carpet she should now just announce "oh, by the way, I think Corbyn was right about the claims of antisemitism within Labour being exaggerated for factional purposes" or similar.
Doing a Brand?Trying to clear her conscience perhaps bit like people who find religion in their last days.
A dig? An explanation, I would have thought.Penny Mordaunt got in a pretty good dig by saying she couldn't defect to labour because she's too left wing.
A dig? An explanation, I would have thought.
It's funny because it's depressing.Well yeah it works as both a joke and a statement of fact.
Just looked it up and, presumably from the same speech:Penny Mordaunt got in a pretty good dig by saying she couldn't defect to labour because she's too left wing.
Indeed. Though equally, it's pathetic the tories storing this up and not kicking her out at the time
Yeah, proper shady all round.Indeed. Though equally, it's pathetic the tories storing this up and not kicking her out at the time
S.Times also going with one victim's rejection of the 'apology':Did anyone see her "apology" to his victims? She didn't even say what she was apologising for, nor did she acknowledge her wrongdoing.
Watch: Elphicke apologises to ex-husband's victims
Whole thing a setup, bitch Has no moral anyway, classic psychopath...heres a giant wad of cash go see if those dull fuckers over there will let you in their club that'll lose the feckers a few votes you're no use to use over here anyway
Yes, there’s no need to use sexist terms, even of people who have behaved despicably.Why do you equate her with a female dog?
given that we have the accepted, gender neutral, descriptor of vermin this looks like casual misogynyWhy do you equate her with a female dog?
Is vermin accepted? Should we be using dehumanising language about anyone?given that we have the accepted, gender neutral, descriptor of vermin this looks like casual misogyny
Sorry, I had assumed it was; it is by me, at least. Perhaps I should have made that clear?Is vermin accepted? Should we be using dehumanising language about anyone?
Acceptable through usageIs vermin accepted? Should we be using dehumanising language about anyone?
You don’t feel uncomfortable using the same language to describe people you don’t like as those who have committed genocide? I certainly do.Sorry, I had assumed it was; it is by me, at least. Perhaps I should have made that clear?
IMO, yes, the term is historically established and completely relevant and appropriate for those that impose their dehumanising ideology for their own greed.
No, not at all, but I respect your sensitivity.You don’t feel uncomfortable using the same language to describe people you don’t like as those who have committed genocide? I certainly do.
I get there are differences - being a Tory is a choice after all. I’m sure I have used similar language before about political enemies, bullies and other people who are unpleasant by choice.No, not at all, but I respect your sensitivity.
(lower than) vermin is actually a pretty good descriptor for those that are ideologically harmful to and parasitic upon the common good.
surely Tory is enough?Is a fair point - any suggestions for an alternative?