Puddy_Tat
🐈⬛
I mean I can C&P paste for you if you like from that article
what, that article that says that AV+ is semi-proportional?
not to be confused with AV which the jenkins commission has rejected and is what was offered in 2011
I mean I can C&P paste for you if you like from that article
No it is not.
As the Wikipedia states
And the own page on AV
AV+ does has some proportionality but the strength AV that was voted for at the 2011 referendum was not a proportional system, and in fact AV can be even less proportional than FPTP. (EDIT: and that paragraph you've quoted is not from the referendum page so thick and dishonest)
But yeah it is everyone else who is think, stupid and informed.
If I recall rightly there was the idea of extremists getting power being promulgated so there was opposition to AV. Just as well we kept the extremists out isn't it? Has the Starmtrooper made any mention of PR yet?
One of the differences between Blair and Starmer is that Blair made at least a pretence at offering a reforming government. Some things, like more autonomy for Scotland and Wales, were actually carried out (though plenty more was not). Starmer on the other hand offers literally no change at all. If he's trying to mimic Blair he's not even good at it.Has the Starmtrooper made any mention of PR yet?
He's bloody awful at prHas the Starmtrooper made any mention of PR yet?
Which one is gabi?Amazing, gabi's combination of ignorance, stupidity and arrogance means that he can't even accept the fucking articles saying in black and white that AV is not proportional.
gabi? Gone I thoughtWhich one is gabi?
Thank you, explains a couple of thingswas reiabuzz, now petcha
But is she as out of control as that Lauren Tooerself?Her cousin Laura de Jungle is pretty wild
But is she as out of control as that Lauren Tooerself?
One of the differences between Blair and Starmer is that Blair made at least a pretence at offering a reforming government. Some things, like more autonomy for Scotland and Wales, were actually carried out (though plenty more was not). Starmer on the other hand offers literally no change at all. If he's trying to mimic Blair he's not even good at it.
FFS. If you don't get the result you want, over PR or brexit it's because people are too thick or not well informed enough. You just can't cope with people not sharing your value set. It's a grim approach.The great British public were unfortunately either too thick or not informed well enough to understand the benefits of PR. Something like 30% voted for it when the referendum eventually happened. I mean I love this country, but that and the Brexit thing does make you wonder how fucking stupid the electorate is.
A better media campaign to actually tell people of the benefits would have been a good idea. From memory they overcomplicated it.
He hasn't got the Blair-flair or his poster-friendly frank white toothy grin. Blair felt like a change (briefly) whereas Starmer feels like a One Nation Tory. Every time I see Starmer, an image of him with a red gnome's hat flashes past my mind and I can't reset it.One of the differences between Blair and Starmer is that Blair made at least a pretence at offering a reforming government. Some things, like more autonomy for Scotland and Wales, were actually carried out (though plenty more was not). Starmer on the other hand offers literally no change at all. If he's trying to mimic Blair he's not even good at it.
Suspect a few asterisks are missing there.The report also proposes creating constitutionally enshrined social rights such as rights to free healthcare and education, a right to receive social welfare and not live in poverty, and rights to adequate housing.
Labour’s controversial “attack ad” accusing Rishi Sunak of failing to put paedophiles in prison has caused more voters to think negatively of Keir Starmer’s party than a Conservative poster that accused the Labour leader of being soft on crime, according to an Opinium poll for the Observer.