The teary guy was the barrister struck of for lying.I just finished watching it.
I found it oddly cathartic, as, I suspect, did some of those participating (except perhaps that poor guy who was reduced to tears by it all).
Oh Christmas tree, oh Christmas tree...And even fewer would know the words to that.
And here it comes.Does anyone know about this Sally Eason? I hadn't heard of her before but she's apparently involved with the doco in some way.
Bob from Brockley
Marlon Solomon
I don't remember thatThe teary guy was the barrister struck of for lying.
Funnily enough that was a fact that Al Jazeera didn't highlight.I don't remember that
Do you have a better source?Funnily enough that was a fact that Al Jazeera didn't highlight.
Here what comes?And here it comes.
How the fuck is anyone supposed to know the truth in all this
I know, and I'm referring to the inevitable (given Al Jazeera's reputation) backlash against this documentary.Here what comes?
Bob from Brockley (amongst others) seems to have an awful lot of receipts.
Yeah, I get you. I haven't made my mind up whether to watch it yet.I know, and I'm referring to the inevitable (given Al Jazeera's reputation) backlash against this documentary.
If that backlash is accurate then I want to know whether i've just wasted four hours watching this shit. I mean, if Chris Williamson had turned up in one of those vidoes i'd have switched it off immediately. On the other hand, and while I'm no fan of the guy, I wouldn't have lumped Peter Oborne in with the likes of Chris. The rest of those involved I don't recognise, bar a brief mention of Jackie Walker, and I'm not convinced her case is genuine antisemitism (it could be). This whole thing is just an ongoing shit show which is why I said I found it exhausting. So here it comes = the dismal readjusting of expectations. The party does seem utterly dysfuynctional and determined to offer nothing of substance, despite the presence of bad faith or ignorant actors from the populist left.
I had the same reaction when I came across the "Not the Andrew Marr" Youtube channel which seemed at first blush interesting and engaging. Ordinary labour members and ex members talking stuff from a left perspective. Then I watched a debate between an Alliance for Workers LIbrty (some guy called Pete iirc) and Chris Williamson who spent the entire time making egregiously pro Putin talking points. I switched off in disgust.
probably better off reading the Forde Report. At least Keith paid for itYeah, I get you. I haven't made my mind up whether to watch it yet.
Now? It's all he's been doing for the last two years...Is he just trolling the left now?
"I'm going to do something reeeeeally radical and worthwhile" "Hahahahah no I fooled you again ".
Nah. He pretends to be a big football fan and has done for years.He's a big football fan and has been for years.
Suspect he was a bit bamboozled by the phrasing of the question though as Saka doesn't really play 'up front' in the traditional sense, usually playing out wide on the wing, albeit alongside an out and out striker like Kane.
Tried to over think it I reckon.
Don’t think you can really draw such a conclusion from this case. His selection for 2019 was a bit dodgy. The selected candidate would have walked the nomination three years ago if he hadn’t been barred.I see Sam Tarry has been deselected, another great lesson in 'this is how you do it' for the Labour left, who can now presumably expect to see a load more of the campaign group out on their ear.
Nah Starmer is actually a football fan, before he was labour leader i once saw him in a pub near the Emirates on matchday
I am the only one who's never heard the word 'crestfallen' before?