Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

Hmm, not sure many backbenchers saw the winter heating allowance, increase of student tuition fees and all the sleaze coming along so soon. She can always take the whip back when there's a new PM.
Pity she couldn't actually vote against the cut in winter fuel allowance. I take your point about starmer's government being even more inept, sleazy and the rest - and she's right about the nepotism - but her own voting record is pretty much that of the hideous loyalist. She's no right to be tipped over the edge just in the last few weeks, it was clear what a starmer government was going to be about long before the election. She's either a moral coward in going along with it or she's a fucking idiot if she thought something better was going to happen.
 
Pity she couldn't actually vote against the cut in winter fuel allowance. I take your point about starmer's government being even more inept, sleazy and the rest - and she's right about the nepotism - but her own voting record is pretty much that of the hideous loyalist. She's no right to be tipped over the edge just in the last few weeks, it was clear what a starmer government was going to be about long before the election. She's either a moral coward in going along with it or she's a fucking idiot if she thought something better was going to happen.
Isn't there perhaps room for both?
 
  • Has never voted in a major vote about paying higher benefits over longer periods for those unable to work due to illness or disability
  • Has never voted on raising welfare benefits at least in line with prices
  • Has never voted in a major vote about a reduction in spending on welfare benefits

But...

Consistently voted against measures to reduce tax avoidance


Voting record - Rosie Duffield MP, Canterbury

We really haven't got time to go into detail about all the reasons why Rosie Duffield is awful. We'd be here until the sun went out.
 
She seems to not have an opinion on quite a wide range of topics
The only think I think I've ever heard her have an opinion on is bleating on with the toilet checking brigade.
Bathroom-1140x650.jpg
 
Loads of RW scum on twitter seem to be suggesting that Starmer has a current super injunction regarding aspects of his private life. Can't really understand why they'd be so keen to see him taken down, tbh.
 
Loads of RW scum on twitter seem to be suggesting that Starmer has a current super injunction regarding aspects of his private life.

will that generate much attention other than people who think a particular 'aspect of someone's private life' is a negative thing?
 
will that generate much attention other than people who think a particular 'aspect of someone's private life' is a negative thing?
I've seen some of the vermin scum attempting to whip up a new two-tier Kier narrative wrt to how their beloved blustercunt was hounded out of office because of personal stuff, seemingly overlooking that he was ditched for lying/misleading Parliament etc.
 
Defo a false alarm....there's been no spike in UK soup production
You would think that No 10 Downing Street would have access to maps, and that someone familiar with, say, the weather map on the telly would think that there was something a bit odd about this map.
 
The right wing and their podcast outriders seem to use the term 'super injunction' as a toddler uses "I'm bored". It's just a device, there's nothing to it, the phrase on its own gets the nut jobs excited. Actually it's more like the "when did you stop beating your wife", if you try to go deeper than just going along with the principle of an injunction being in place you just get "Well they could just deny it and we wouldn't be speculating".
 
Loads of RW scum on twitter seem to be suggesting that Starmer has a current super injunction regarding aspects of his private life. Can't really understand why they'd be so keen to see him taken down, tbh.
Maybe actually the very centrism that he thought would keep everybody happy has meant that everybody hates him in today's increasingly polarised and fractured world?

I dunno, just a thought, probably nothing.
 
The right wing and their podcast outriders seem to use the term 'super injunction' as a toddler uses "I'm bored". It's just a device, there's nothing to it, the phrase on its own gets the nut jobs excited. Actually it's more like the "when did you stop beating your wife", if you try to go deeper than just going along with the principle of an injunction being in place you just get "Well they could just deny it and we wouldn't be speculating".
I think you're correct, but I seem to remember most political chat about super injunctions of recent years related to blustercunt and came from Labour outriders, no?
 
I think you're correct, but I seem to remember most political chat about super injunctions of recent years related to blustercunt and came from Labour outriders, no?
The rumours of a super injunction are down to the new poster boy for Reform, employed by Isabel Oakeshott apparently:

1727773251111.jpeg
 

So it turns out they are now defining the zero carbon electricity system as "5% carbon".

"One thing these routes will not deliver is the “zero carbon electricity system” promised by the Labour party before the election – at least, not all of the time. Since coming to power, ministers have made subtle tweaks to the rhetoric, choosing to talk about “clean power” by the end of the decade. This is arguably a more flexible target.

“There’s no established definition of clean power,” says Slye. “So what does it realistically mean? One of the key pieces of work from the Committee on Climate Change found that the cost [of decarbonisation] really begins to escalate when you reach those last percentage points towards 100% clean power.

“So at the moment, the working definition that we’re using for this analysis is to reach 95% clean power. That means that, by 2030, 95% of the generation in Great Britain over the period of a year will be from clean power sources. And that means that the remaining 5% will come from unabated gas. That’s our definition.”
 
Back
Top Bottom