Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

Unless Corbyn is about to surprise us all with deep seated prejudice against transgender people, I suspect I'm in the right for once.
Maybe? But I suppose I was really thinking about Shockat Adam, Adnan Hussain, Ayoub Khan and Iqbal Mohamed; I've had a cursory peek and I've not really seen much evidence of pro-trans sentiments. You never know, she might find herself in like-minded company? Stranger things, and all that.
 
Maybe? But I suppose I was really thinking about Shockat Adam, Adnan Hussain, Ayoub Khan and Iqbal Mohamed; I've had a cursory peek and I've not really seen much evidence of pro-trans sentiments. You never know, she might find herself in like-minded company? Stranger things, and all that.
I'm wary of assuming positions from silence. I take the point though.
 
Starmer said the sun will eventually expand and swallow the earth, and then explode, but then things will get better.
That is simply lefty doom-mongering. The Sun will not explode. It is not large enough to become a supernova. And that is one of the things for which we have to thank the Labour government.

We cannot expect things to get better after the sun becomes a red giant and engulfs the Earth, and to say that we can is simply to indulge in childish fantasies.

The rate of expansion of the observable cosmos is increasing, so the scientists tell us, and it looks like the fate of it will be a "heat death", when there will be no activity at all. I happen to know that Keir Starmer is personally, viscerally, committed to ensuring that things will get better for hard working families before the heat death of the observable cosmos.
 
Mention of the famous 'human rights lawyer' Cherie Booth, got me wondering what she's been up to lately. Amongst other things, her wiki page has her lobbying Hilary Clinton for the Qatari royal family, advising the Maldives government in their struggles with an imprisoned former president and, in you couldn't make it up mode, acting as 'Ethics Adviser' to the Israeli security/spyware NSO group.

Cherie and Euan also have a proper empire of buy-to-let flats - nearly 30 in Greater Manchester as of 2016.
For a moment I briefly got confused there and thought that image meant that Duffield was following Brogdale rather than Linehan. But yes, I think there is a bit of quiet rivalry between Unison and the TERFs over who are the real inheritors of the suffragette colours.
 
You wonder what the Blair's chat about when they are having their tea:

'Alright love, what you been up to today, you were at that JP Morgan Chase weren't you?'
- Aye, but then I did a bit of PR with the butcher of Khazakstan. I'm sorting out that Israel-Hezbollah malarky tomorrow. What about you, been doing any human rights?
'Oh aye, loads. Sorted out the Emir of Qatar's human rights and then made sure that Israeli cyber intelligence lot were acting all ethical'.
- Chips?
'yeah, it's summat to do with chips I think'
- No, for tea.
 
It didn’t work
True enough, although I wonder what would have happened if the tories had just got in & joined forces with reform so we had a proper far right tory government with some headbanging tory and reform ministers. Particularly how the Farage riots would have panned out if Farage had been in there cheerleading for them.
 
I think it became apparent to her just after the point where she was guaranteed a £91,346 salary for the next 5 years.
Hmm, not sure many backbenchers saw the winter heating allowance, increase of student tuition fees and all the sleaze coming along so soon. She can always take the whip back when there's a new PM.
 
True enough, although I wonder what would have happened if the tories had just got in & joined forces with reform so we had a proper far right tory government with some headbanging tory and reform ministers. Particularly how the Farage riots would have panned out if Farage had been in there cheerleading for them.
If we’re speculating on an alternative reality in which people voted for what they wanted to happen rather than what they didn’t want to happen, it seems a shame to restrict your imagination to that resulting in Tories + Reform. Do you really think that the majority of the country would have wanted Tories + Reform?
 
The alternative reality (or "possibility" as we could also call it) of the tories getting in was only prevented by people voting labour. I think it's quite worth speculating that a tory party returned to power would have moved much further to the right, particularly if they'd elected a new leader. We saw that Reform picked up seats - a hung parliament with Reform holding the balance of power was another alternative reality made quite possible by our voting system.

Another alternative reality would be if Trump wins in November - then I think we'd have seen some fairly close collaboration between the two governments and politics here would have lurched to the right.

People are quite plausibly speculating that we'll get a far-right government at the end of Starmer's term unless there's some major change in direction. I'm speculating that we could already have had a far-right government this term.
 
The alternative reality (or "possibility" as we could also call it) of the tories getting in was only prevented by people voting labour.

And potentially also by people in other constituencies where Labour couldn't win (eg mine), eating their own shit voting Lib-Dem.

I can't help wondering what we'll need to swallow vote for next time if we want to keep the far right out.
 
Hmm, not sure many backbenchers saw the winter heating allowance, increase of student tuition fees and all the sleaze coming along so soon. She can always take the whip back when there's a new PM.
It's possible that Duffield was naive enough not to foresee what the much advertised 'hard choices' would actually entail, but that doesn't explain why, when given the opportunity to oppose the needless, vindictive cut, she literally did nothing.

1727594907995.png
 
ffs, so this really is just grandstanding and virtue signalling then.

(I'm sure her own 24k worth of rent claims over the last year or so despite her home only being an hour from London are totally necessary and unhypocritical, I mean after all who could possibly commute from Kent every day??!)
 
The thing that gets me is how cheap these politicians are. Is it really such a lure to be given a few freebies that they could easily afford themselves?
I suspect the real lure lies in the fact that these "freebies" are small down-payments or tasters of the riches that open up to them once they get around the other side of the revolving door to financialised capital....as long as they continue to do the 'right things' and govern in the interests of their once and future paymasters.
 
The thing that gets me is how cheap these politicians are. Is it really such a lure to be given a few freebies that they could easily afford themselves?
these fripperies and bungs are infuriating as is the response 'because I deserve them, its all declared' but the real meat is the 4mill from a cayman island based hedge fund. I'll remind everyone that for a few yrs the party financed itself by members subs and union money so its a viable funding method, starmer and co chose to be in hock to private finance because they are thoroughgoing cunts.
 
these fripperies and bungs are infuriating as is the response 'because I deserve them, its all declared' but the real meat is the 4mill from a cayman island based hedge fund. I'll remind everyone that for a few yrs the party financed itself by members subs and union money so its a viable funding method, starmer and co chose to be in hock to private finance because they are thoroughgoing cunts.
That party funding choice is also a very good example of prefigurative politics.
 
It's possible that Duffield was naive enough not to foresee what the much advertised 'hard choices' would actually entail, but that doesn't explain why, when given the opportunity to oppose the needless, vindictive cut, she literally did nothing.

View attachment 444639
  • Has never voted in a major vote about paying higher benefits over longer periods for those unable to work due to illness or disability
  • Has never voted on raising welfare benefits at least in line with prices
  • Has never voted in a major vote about a reduction in spending on welfare benefits

But...

Consistently voted against measures to reduce tax avoidance


Voting record - Rosie Duffield MP, Canterbury
 
Back
Top Bottom