Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

Starmer will have to form a scrum :thumbs:

In a nutshell, Scrum requires a Scrum Master to foster an environment where:
1. A Product Owner orders the work for a complex problem into a Product Backlog.
2. The Scrum Team turns a selection of the work into an Increment of value during a Sprint.
3. The Scrum Team and its stakeholders inspect the results and adjust for the next Sprint.
4. Repeat
 
just how divorced from reality are these bellends?
labour-mp-sir-keir-starmer-launches-his-labour-leadership-campaign-in-manchester-11th-january-2020-2AMADBM.jpg


above head height
 
i saw this "agile ceremonies" gobbledegook on my facebook and assumed it was a spoof. Fucking hell - just how divorced from reality are these bellends?

They're on about their seventh rebrand/relaunch since Starmer took over. And at no point in any of this soul-searching did anyone pitch the idea of 'talking like human beings'.

The 'prototyping' stuff is C&P'ed straight from generic business consultancy drivel, without anyone noticing that a political party is not actually supposed to design and sell vacuum cleaners or ready meals.
 
Martin Luther King may have had a dream but suffered from a campaign which lacked flat dynamic structures and no clear role definitions for staff

View attachment 284034


View attachment 284035
I quite like the bit about it 'making it easy for voters to understand who we are and what we stand for'. Oh my.

I've always been aware that moderate sized organisations of the centre left (lol), such as parties and charities, operate with the same kind of managerial tools* and language as the rest of capital. But there's something stark seeing it set out, particularly if you haven't been keeping an eye on how Labour's organisation evolved over the years, say from the Campbell era onwards. There's almost a sense of madness, where processes and power structures have been so reshaped that it's impossible to insert any other kind of values or outcomes. Of course that's the point of it, it gives power to those who deploy this voodoo. But it's also a truly shit way of doing politics. The whole thing is transacted in words of madness, making it near impossible that the outcome will be political messages and conversations that speak to voters and their actual human concerns.

* Pun potential. :)
 
I quite like the bit about it 'making it easy for voters to understand who we are and what we stand for'. Oh my.

I've always been aware that moderate sized organisations of the centre left (lol), such as parties and charities, operate with the same kind of managerial tools* and language as the rest of capital. But there's something stark seeing it set out, particularly if you haven't been keeping an eye on how Labour's organisation evolved over the years, say from the Campbell era onwards. There's almost a sense of madness, where processes and power structures have been so reshaped that it's impossible to insert any other kind of values or outcomes. Of course that's the point of it, it gives power to those who deploy this voodoo. But it's also a truly shit way of doing politics. The whole thing is transacted in words of madness, making it near impossible that the outcome will be political messages and conversations that speak to voters and their actual human concerns.

* Pun potential. :)
A viable alternative orthodox model would be guided community activism. Key national messages from the centre with bespoke messaging on local issues aided by a marketing and comms team at the centre. Local teams empowered with good data and market segmentation . Development of membership with training and coaching etc etc .
The current set of proposals are essentially for an organisation without a participatory membership based on restructuring the central office at a time of financial pressure . Even without any politics it’s stale and timid .
 
No fan of Starmer, nor his tedious droning blather at the despatch box yesterday, but hearing the Tories yelling "sit down" was pretty sickening. If entirely typical
 
A viable alternative orthodox model would be guided community activism. Key national messages from the centre with bespoke messaging on local issues aided by a marketing and comms team at the centre. Local teams empowered with good data and market segmentation . Development of membership with training and coaching etc etc .
The current set of proposals are essentially for an organisation without a participatory membership based on restructuring the central office at a time of financial pressure . Even without any politics it’s stale and timid .
It did feel a bit like a 60s science fiction film where they enter a city and find the computers are still running some mad routine, but the population died off thousands of years ago.
 
It did feel a bit like a 60s science fiction film where they enter a city and find the computers are still running some mad routine, but the population died off thousands of years ago.
Do you know the Lee Healey/Barney Farmer cartoon with the Britpop-mad dad who insists on DJing his daughter's wedding and ruins the reception by just constantly playing Oasis?
1629376491366.png
Funny in its own right, but one could also see the character who blindly refuses to accept that it's no longer the mid-1990s as being somehow an allegory for something or other.
 
Have we had Keefs new slogan yet? ' Win the future'
Said it in the Guardian and now tweeting.
Has no one pointed out the acronym to him 🤣

Quite apart from the acronym, is that photo of Starmer with three older (and all white) women really the best illustration of what winning the future looks like?
 
Back
Top Bottom