Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

I was astounded about five years ago when they suddenly appeared again. And they had young people involved for some reason. Still the same dreadful old politics )maybe even worse, one of the first things they came out with was a defense of shooting down that Ukrainian plane).

Have any of the various SP splinter factions folded back into Socialist Apology? I've found it impossible to get keep track of the various fragmentations.
 
In news that will not surprise anyone, the 'adults' have near bankrupted the party and are trying to blame Corbyn (who steadied the finances)


GX3czqc.png
 
Is there any evidence or sources for this or is it just what he thinks?
It's his analysis. But does seem eminently plausible for anyone with knowledge of the Labour Right. After all, these are the people who wanted Labour to lose in 2017 and then set up an entire astro-turf campaign (the ludicrous 'Peoples' Vote') to make sure of it in 2019!
 
Socialist Appeal did well out of the Corbynista influx into Labour, and as others have noted, started recruiting a lot of young members. An indication of this was, before the Corbyn phenomenon, I used to see one old and sad looking seller of their paper on demos. Later there were sizeable numbers on demos behind Socialist Appeal banners, latest one being Kill the BIll demo that started in Russell Square. But as they are now proscribed, it will be difficult for them, as a parasite on the Labour Party, to survive. Will they decide to merge with their old comrades of the Socialist Party? Not likely, considering the past animosity. More likely to wither and die.
 
but the party is apparently hiring 30-50 temporary staff for the purging unit


:facepalm:
My god, the job ad for investigators is quite something. It’s a fantastic opportunity and you must be
  • Creative and open to new ways of working including digital transformation, participatory methods and co-creation of solutions with those most affected.

 
belboid sorry catching up here - who defended shooting down the Ukrainian plane? link?
Having done a bit of looking around, I guess it's a reference to this - less "shooting down the plane was good", more "what if it was a FALSE FLAG, eh?":

I'd never looked into their position on Syria before now, but it turns out they have some spicy takes on the White Helmets and related matters as well:

Anyway, I suppose this raises some big questions: Will they come up with a new theory explaining that the Labour Party was the only correct place for socialists to be from its founding up until July 2021, but it's now bankrupt and must be smashed so a new workers party can be built, or will they continue to insist, Groucho Marx-style, that everyone should still be in Labour? Or split between the two options?
Also, does this mean that AWLers can be in Labour but SAers can't, and if so does that mean the AWL can now bully them ("oh, just off on my way to the CLP meeting, it's going to be so much fun, are you coming... oh wait, I forgot, you can't, can you?") or does it mean that they can now bully the AWL ("goody-two-shoes Schachtmanites, can't even get expelled!")?
 
Phwoar, that's pretty out there. Great. Thanks for reminding me why I don't have anything to do with these groups, even the ones that have generally played the soft-and-cuddly line through the years like SA
 
Having done a bit of looking around, I guess it's a reference to this - less "shooting down the plane was good", more "what if it was a FALSE FLAG, eh?":

I'd never looked into their position on Syria before now, but it turns out they have some spicy takes on the White Helmets and related matters as well:

Anyway, I suppose this raises some big questions: Will they come up with a new theory explaining that the Labour Party was the only correct place for socialists to be from its founding up until July 2021, but it's now bankrupt and must be smashed so a new workers party can be built, or will they continue to insist, Groucho Marx-style, that everyone should still be in Labour? Or split between the two options?
Also, does this mean that AWLers can be in Labour but SAers can't, and if so does that mean the AWL can now bully them ("oh, just off on my way to the CLP meeting, it's going to be so much fun, are you coming... oh wait, I forgot, you can't, can you?") or does it mean that they can now bully the AWL ("goody-two-shoes Schachtmanites, can't even get expelled!")?
well found, I had only gone through the paper which strangely has absolutely no mention of the incident at all!

Their awfulness on Syria flows from Comrade Grants' long-standing admiration for Assad Sr who led a 'transformation of social relations' and thus created a deformed workers state.

The AWL has long been a proscribed organisation.
 
Having done a bit of looking around, I guess it's a reference to this - less "shooting down the plane was good", more "what if it was a FALSE FLAG, eh?":

I'd never looked into their position on Syria before now, but it turns out they have some spicy takes on the White Helmets and related matters as well:

Anyway, I suppose this raises some big questions: Will they come up with a new theory explaining that the Labour Party was the only correct place for socialists to be from its founding up until July 2021, but it's now bankrupt and must be smashed so a new workers party can be built, or will they continue to insist, Groucho Marx-style, that everyone should still be in Labour? Or split between the two options?
Also, does this mean that AWLers can be in Labour but SAers can't, and if so does that mean the AWL can now bully them ("oh, just off on my way to the CLP meeting, it's going to be so much fun, are you coming... oh wait, I forgot, you can't, can you?") or does it mean that they can now bully the AWL ("goody-two-shoes Schachtmanites, can't even get expelled!")?
As others have said, both SA and AWL members were expelled back in 2015-2016. (Of course, that doesn't mean that AWL members are not operating inside Labour). As to gloating over the SA being expelled, the AWL has issued a statement condemning the ban. See here: No to Starmer's bans! | Workers' Liberty
 
In the NS Kier attacks the tories for racism, indecision, cuts for the poor. He wants a more inclusive diverse happy country as that’s what he stands for. Skills jobs and public services are mentioned. That’s it.
 
In the NS Kier attacks the tories for racism, indecision, cuts for the poor. He wants a more inclusive diverse happy country as that’s what he stands for. Skills jobs and public services are mentioned. That’s it.
Wot, literally nothing about Motherhood or apple-pie?
 
Will they come up with a new theory explaining that the Labour Party was the only correct place for socialists to be from its founding up until July 2021, but it's now bankrupt and must be smashed so a new workers party can be built, or will they continue to insist,
When I was active in the Militant one of the most arduous tasks (there were a lot of arduous tasks) was explaining to new recruits why we invested so much time and energy in attacking everything the Labour Party said and did, whilst simultaneously spending even more time and energy attacking their attempts to expel us

Why, they’d ask, did we bother fighting attempts to boot us out by a party that hated us and which we condemned on every issue of significance. We’d patiently explain the ‘dialectic process’ to them and the Labour Party’s ineffable role as the only possible mass party of the working class. These naïve youngsters would either eventually come to realise the dubious benefits of entryism or clock that we were mad from the off and hopefully went and did something more useful with their youthful lives.

Until Taaffe decided that the Labour Party was no longer the mass party of the working class and a new one would need to be built. By us. Then we’d patiently explain to new recruits that the Labour Party was not the mass party of the working class etc etc
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom