Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Keir Starmer's time is up

Wait how come 10,724,953 votes in 2001 gave a stonking majority but 10,295,607 votes in 2019 gave the worst results since 1935?

UK population 2001: 59m
UK population 2021: 67.5m

Other factors... But this is % of vote for each:

2001

Lab: 40.7%
Con: 31.6%
LD: 18.3%
SNP: 1.8%

2019

Con: 43.6%
Lab: 32.2%
SNP: 7.4%
LD: 1.7%
 
UK population 2001: 59m
UK population 2021: 67.5m

Other factors... But this is % of vote for each:

2001

Lab: 40.7%
Con: 31.6%
LD: 18.3%
SNP: 1.8%

2019

Con: 43.6%
Lab: 32.2%
SNP: 7.4%
LD: 1.7%
Two factors you omit, namely that it takes rather more labour votes to win a seat than it does Tory votes and the distribution of Tory votes makes it easier for them to win too. Being as so many labour votes are in hackney and Lambeth and so on.
 
Milliband, if he could could recreate the “just back from holiday with a beard” look he sported once a few years ago, plus punched someone and decked them for being a bully, that would be a more successful strategy.
Exhume the late Jim Callaghan and put him back in charge, stand him on the 1979 labour manifesto, and he'd almost certainly win more seats than starmer would
 
At the risk of ventriloquising voters who aren't me, I wonder if might occur to the Labour Party head honchos one day that when many voters say in focus groups that they value patriotism, what they might mean is something like 'I value a country that makes me feel valued, and I insist on wanting that country even when it seems fictional'. The flag is not the point you worthless PR-machine pricks.

They honestly don't understand that it isn't. Patriotism is something like football, something that the proles like and so the politician must claim to like it too.
 
They honestly don't understand that it isn't. Patriotism is something like football, something that the proles like and so the politician must claim to like it too.
The key is to be genuinely part of something - something old or new. Something that you grew up in or took part in kicking off. Labour still are in some areas - the areas they are now losing. Shortcuts like this will be sniffed out for the cynical crap they are in exactly these areas. To do it this way is to endorse and be part of bad things. A plan drawn up by people who think working class people don't really exist beyond their marketing can only be 1997 lucky once - or very very rarely.
 
Last edited:
I think you need to take from that statement that the nurse perceived the present govt to be more competent at managing capital and society than Starmer and his lot.
I reckon she's right. I voted Labour out of cowardice at the last three elections but I don't reckon anything would be better for anyone under Labour. If anything the Tories recognise the need to throw a few crumbs here and there whereas Sir Kieth's proved himself willing to stab his party and the working class in the back without having had a sniff of power.
 
Last edited:
I reckon she's right. I voted Labour out of cowardice at the last three elections but I don't reckon anything would be better for anyone under Labour. If anything the Tory's recognise the need to throw a few crumbs here and there whereas Sir Kieth's proved himself willing to stab his party and the working class in the back without having had a sniff of power.
That's unfair. He's quite prepared to stab them in the front, as with his numerous and ostentatious acts of support for the Tory government in votes in parliament
 
Back
Top Bottom