Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Just Stop Oil

Four JSO protestors in court today over two separate incidents.

Two Just Stop Oil protesters have appeared in court accused of damaging two jets that were sprayed with orange paint at Stansted Airport.

The pair are said to have used angle grinders to break through an airport fence at around 5am on 20 June, before using fire extinguishers filled with paint.

Won't anyone think of the jet planes?

Jennifer Kowalski, 28, of Dumbarton in Scotland, and Cole Macdonald, 22, of Brighton, appeared before Chelmsford Crown Court on Monday.

The defendants, who are on conditional bail, were not asked to enter pleas to charges and the case was adjourned until 15 August.

https://www.itv.com/news/anglia/202...-in-court-over-airport-jet-spray-paint-damage

Two women in their 80s have denied damaging the glass around the Magna Carta at the British Library on 10 May.

The Reverend Sue Parfitt, 82, and Judith Bruce, 85, each pleaded not guilty to a charge of damaging property when they appeared at Wood Green Crown Court on Monday.

Rev Parfitt, of Bristol, and Ms Bruce, of Swansea, were granted conditional bail. According to the BBC, their trial is scheduled to start on 13 January 2026. (Seems a long way off; wonder if that's a typo.)

Magna Carta: Campaigners in court accused of damaging case
 
Four JSO protestors in court today over two separate incidents.



Won't anyone think of the jet planes?



https://www.itv.com/news/anglia/202...-in-court-over-airport-jet-spray-paint-damage



Rev Parfitt, of Bristol, and Ms Bruce, of Swansea, were granted conditional bail. According to the BBC, their trial is scheduled to start on 13 January 2026. (Seems a long way off; wonder if that's a typo.)

Magna Carta: Campaigners in court accused of damaging case
Presumably the state hoping that by 2026 there may be fewer defendants.
 
Rev Parfitt, of Bristol, and Ms Bruce, of Swansea, were granted conditional bail. According to the BBC, their trial is scheduled to start on 13 January 2026. (Seems a long way off; wonder if that's a typo.)
Both octogenarians as well. Can't imagine either of them being sent to prison.
 
Jamming up the M25 is nothing by comparison to this, which is putting lives, property and wildlife at risk
Is there an indication at this point this was the work of environmental activists? It feels more like Putin's hand to me... It'd certainly be idiotic in the extreme to target trains of all things if the protest is environment-related.
 
I vaguely recall hearing about rail sabotage occurring in France a while back, before Russia started acting the maggot on the world stage.
 
It certainly seems to have raised public awareness and angered many which is good
You could argue they've made protest harder

"In the face of this disorder the state felt compelled to act. Police chiefs asked for more and better powers - and they got them."

Now they are lying down in airport terminals. Who are they trying to win over? People who have spent hundreds on plane tickets and holidays? Pissed off familiies stuck in airport terminals? Their screaming kids? Is there any evidence that people watching these actions are being radicalised or persuaded to do....whatever? Presumably write to their MP and compel them to act since that appears the only productive course of action these protests can lead to
 
You could argue they've made protest harder

"In the face of this disorder the state felt compelled to act. Police chiefs asked for more and better powers - and they got them."

Now they are lying down in airport terminals. Who are they trying to win over? People who have spent hundreds on plane tickets and holidays? Pissed off familiies stuck in airport terminals? Their screaming kids? Is there any evidence that people watching these actions are being radicalised or persuaded to do....whatever? Presumably write to their MP and compel them to act since that appears the only productive course of action these protests can lead to


Governments have been limiting protests for decades, Labour under Blair to tories under Sunak - none of them want to allow protests and Starmer sure as shit isn’t going to allow protests

JSO isn’t going to be allowed to protest no matter what it does
 
You could argue they've made protest harder

"In the face of this disorder the state felt compelled to act. Police chiefs asked for more and better powers - and they got them."

Now they are lying down in airport terminals. Who are they trying to win over? People who have spent hundreds on plane tickets and holidays? Pissed off familiies stuck in airport terminals? Their screaming kids? Is there any evidence that people watching these actions are being radicalised or persuaded to do....whatever? Presumably write to their MP and compel them to act since that appears the only productive course of action these protests can lead to
your tagline should be the dead kennedys 'give me convenience or give me death'. only you're serious about it
 
You could argue they've made protest harder

"In the face of this disorder the state felt compelled to act. Police chiefs asked for more and better powers - and they got them."

Now they are lying down in airport terminals. Who are they trying to win over? People who have spent hundreds on plane tickets and holidays? Pissed off familiies stuck in airport terminals? Their screaming kids? Is there any evidence that people watching these actions are being radicalised or persuaded to do....whatever? Presumably write to their MP and compel them to act since that appears the only productive course of action these protests can lead to
Did you read the article Rob Ray wrote and posted above? JSO's actions are not particularly extreme, historically speaking. The reaction to them has been extreme.
 
Did you read the article Rob Ray wrote and posted above? JSO's actions are not particularly extreme, historically speaking. The reaction to them has been extreme.
It doesn't matter whether we here think they are extreme. It matters how people they are trying to win over think, and how the media frame it.

Either they get ignored and stepped over/on, or they stop people going on holiday. How does either of those advance their cause?
 
You could argue they've made protest harder

"In the face of this disorder the state felt compelled to act. Police chiefs asked for more and better powers - and they got them."

Now they are lying down in airport terminals. Who are they trying to win over? People who have spent hundreds on plane tickets and holidays? Pissed off familiies stuck in airport terminals? Their screaming kids? Is there any evidence that people watching these actions are being radicalised or persuaded to do....whatever? Presumably write to their MP and compel them to act since that appears the only productive course of action these protests can lead to
Jeez, you really are all output and no input aren’t you?
 
It doesn't matter whether we here think they are extreme. It matters how people they are trying to win over think, and how the media frame it.

Either they get ignored and stepped over/on, or they stop people going on holiday. How does either of those advance their cause?
You have a really simplistic linear approach to understanding the role of protest, which doesn't take into account that JSO is just one group amongst many when it comes to climate/environment, and how an issue being repeatedly put into the news can increase its salience even if people don't like the actual group doing the protest.

Here is one paper that has identified positive effects of JSO actions: https://www.socialchangelab.org/_files/ugd/503ba4_a184ae5bbce24c228d07eda25566dc13.pdf

Personally I am a lot more comfortable with airport protests. The majority of flying is done by the wealthy; flying is not essential and I don't really care if you're made to feel a bit uncomfortable going through an airport (or should I say more uncomfortable, given they are hellish places to begin with).
 
You have a really simplistic linear approach to understanding the role of protest, which doesn't take into account that JSO is just one group amongst many when it comes to climate/environment, and how an issue being repeatedly put into the news can increase its salience even if people don't like the actual group doing the protest.
'linear'?

This thread is about JSO, I don't know what other groups exist that are taking actions so I'm not commenting on them. If that's linear, oh well.

An issue can make it into the news but how it's framed is what's important. If pople hear about this all the time, but only in a negative "these people want to ruin your holiday" context, are they going to draw positive conclusions or think "fuck off JSO"?

Here is one paper that has identified positive effects of JSO actions: https://www.socialchangelab.org/_files/ugd/503ba4_a184ae5bbce24c228d07eda25566dc13.pdf

Personally I am a lot more comfortable with airport protests. The majority of flying is done by the wealthy; flying is not essential and I don't really care if you're made to feel a bit uncomfortable going through an airport (or should I say more uncomfortable, given they are hellish places to begin with).
I mean airport protests don't affect me, I don't fly. But that isn't really the point. This is the summer holidays and there may be some, maybe many, working class families taking themsleves for the one holiday they can afford, now possibly missing a flight or having to cancel. What impact does that have on the oil industry or the government? Fuck all

As to that study. It's hard to parse because I dont really speak their language, but it said this on the issue of question 3, support for climate policies:
We alsotested whether increased awareness of Just Stop Oil was associated with stronger supportfor climate policies. This was not the case. Instead, in both types of analysis there was anon-significant trend towards a negative association (analysis 1 looking at overall effects:estimate=-0.05, SE=0.03, t=-1.73, p=0.10; analysis 2 looking at relative differences frombefore to after the campaign: estimate=-0.05, SE=0.04, t=-1.32, p=0.19).
 
Back
Top Bottom