As by their reasoning we are apparently approaching a climate catastrophe one would have thought a more significant action would have been deemed appropriate. It all seems terribly tame.
So it was more likely that they would be convicted. That does not make them prisoners of conscience.
I'm afraid you can't step out of a conspiracy by just stating you are theorising.I agree, we've done the soup on a painting now, it becomes reiterative and dull. Pulling down statues seems to work better. Blocking motorways, I don't even know how to measure success except in headlines?
What do you think would be a more significant action? (bearing in mind thought-crime, incitement to violence, conspiracy to terrorise, all those laws apply in this place just as any other! But in THEORY what would a potential significant action actually do?)
I'm afraid you can't step out of a conspiracy by just stating you are theorising.
Unless you're Pete Townsend
Pete was providing his credit card details to certain websites for purely research purposes which is entirely different.Unless you're Pete Townsend
This is just fucking abominable…
Elderly activist to spend Christmas in prison because tag does not fit
Woman jailed for M25 protest not allowed to continue home detention because electronic tags are too bigwww.theguardian.com
Anybody would think she is a massive murderer who is a risk to the public.
As symbolic gestures go, that's one of their better ones.Wtf are they hoping to achieve by desecrating Charles Darwin's grave? Bunch oof arseholes.
Westminster Abbey: JSO activists spray-paint Charles Darwin grave
Please give us your strategy for effective climate protest.Wtf are they hoping to achieve by desecrating Charles Darwin's grave? Bunch of arseholes.
Westminster Abbey: JSO activists spray-paint Charles Darwin grave
To be fair, I wish JSO would tell us their strategy for effective climate protest because they don't seem to be targeting the most egregious polluters, their financers or the politicians who support the main polluters.Please give us your strategy for effective climate protest.
Can't find the links right now but I think JSO have been pretty open about their strategy and there have been links earlier in thread. Many of us have been sceptical but no-one has really come up with anything better either.To be fair, I wish JSO would tell us their strategy for effective climate protest because they don't seem to be targeting the most egregious polluters, their financers or the politicians who support the main polluters.
If by effective you mean more effective than JSO, then drawing spunking cocks on bus stop windows would work.Please give us your strategy for effective climate protest.
I agree, but look what happened when people did do stuff like that.To be fair, I wish JSO would tell us their strategy for effective climate protest because they don't seem to be targeting the most egregious polluters, their financers or the politicians who support the main polluters.
You do know the article does actually answer your question yeah?Wtf are they hoping to achieve by desecrating Charles Darwin's grave? Bunch of arseholes.
Westminster Abbey: JSO activists spray-paint Charles Darwin grave
To be fair it's likely JSO will already have narks in place.I agree, but look what happened when people did do stuff like that.
The idea that any small activist group could have a meaningful strategy in the face of the scale and urgency of the issue seems pretty ludicrous to be honest. I don't really blame them if these kind of stunts is the best they can come up with.To be fair, I wish JSO would tell us their strategy for effective climate protest because they don't seem to be targeting the most egregious polluters, their financers or the politicians who support the main polluters.
Can't find the links right now but I think JSO have been pretty open about their strategy and there have been links earlier in thread. Many of us have been sceptical but no-one has really come up with anything better either.
They would point to examples where they have done the above and it has been completely ineffective eg zero media coverage.
To be fair, I wish JSO would tell us their strategy for effective climate protest because they don't seem to be targeting the most egregious polluters, their financers or the politicians who support the main polluters.
"The other activist, Ms Bligh, said: "We've done this because there's no hope for the world, really.""You do know the article does actually answer your question yeah?
You asked what they were trying to achieve - they clearly state what they ate trying to achieve. Whether you believe that it's effective is something else."The other activist, Ms Bligh, said: "We've done this because there's no hope for the world, really.""
Why protest if there is no hope?
"Ms Lee added: "I believe he would approve because he was a good scientist and he would be following the science, and he would be as upset as us with the government for ignoring the science.""
It is not true that the government is ignoring the science. The government of the UK and the governments of most states accept the science of climate change. This is why the UK government is committed to cutting back the emission of greenhouse gases. The government is not doing enough, but does Just Stop Oil have an alternative programme?
Ms Lee told the PA news agency: "We are trying to get the government to act on climate change. They are not doing enough."
I dunno, but if you're going to desecrate graves, which is a cuntish thing to do, anyway, maybe go for CEOs of big oil companies instead of respected naturalists.Please give us your strategy for effective climate protest.