Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Just Stop Oil

As by their reasoning we are apparently approaching a climate catastrophe one would have thought a more significant action would have been deemed appropriate. It all seems terribly tame.
 
As by their reasoning we are apparently approaching a climate catastrophe one would have thought a more significant action would have been deemed appropriate. It all seems terribly tame.

I agree, we've done the soup on a painting now, it becomes reiterative and dull. Pulling down statues seems to work better. Blocking motorways, I don't even know how to measure success except in headlines?

What do you think would be a more significant action? (bearing in mind thought-crime, incitement to violence, conspiracy to terrorise, all those laws apply in this place just as any other! But in THEORY what would a potential significant action actually do?)
 
So it was more likely that they would be convicted. That does not make them prisoners of conscience.

If telling th jury that their conscience led them to commit the action stops them being convicted, the state then bans them from using their conscience as a defence to ensure they are convicted, that makes them what?

Nice weather we’re having lately, btw.
 
I agree, we've done the soup on a painting now, it becomes reiterative and dull. Pulling down statues seems to work better. Blocking motorways, I don't even know how to measure success except in headlines?

What do you think would be a more significant action? (bearing in mind thought-crime, incitement to violence, conspiracy to terrorise, all those laws apply in this place just as any other! But in THEORY what would a potential significant action actually do?)
I'm afraid you can't step out of a conspiracy by just stating you are theorising.
 
To be fair, I wish JSO would tell us their strategy for effective climate protest because they don't seem to be targeting the most egregious polluters, their financers or the politicians who support the main polluters.
Can't find the links right now but I think JSO have been pretty open about their strategy and there have been links earlier in thread. Many of us have been sceptical but no-one has really come up with anything better either.

They would point to examples where they have done the above and it has been completely ineffective eg zero media coverage.
 
Where this protest falls down is that it is not a secret that 1.5 degrees is dead.
This kind of protest is appropriate in a case where the state is suppressing a piece of news. The other day the news was reporting that the average temperature had broken 1.5 degrees above the pre-industrial average.
The protestors are not telling us anything that we do not know.
 
To be fair, I wish JSO would tell us their strategy for effective climate protest because they don't seem to be targeting the most egregious polluters, their financers or the politicians who support the main polluters.
The idea that any small activist group could have a meaningful strategy in the face of the scale and urgency of the issue seems pretty ludicrous to be honest. I don't really blame them if these kind of stunts is the best they can come up with.
 
Can't find the links right now but I think JSO have been pretty open about their strategy and there have been links earlier in thread. Many of us have been sceptical but no-one has really come up with anything better either.

They would point to examples where they have done the above and it has been completely ineffective eg zero media coverage.

I think there's clearly much better stuff to do, it's just that it's much harder (and some much riskier and with harsher sentencing) and would also fly in the face of the narrow remit of the activist culture way of doing things that JSO spring from.

To be fair, I wish JSO would tell us their strategy for effective climate protest because they don't seem to be targeting the most egregious polluters, their financers or the politicians who support the main polluters.

I'm far from convinced that JSO targeting them would make any more of an impact either tbh, even though it would feel (and be) more related to the actual issue.

I think a broader discussion around climate strategy is very much needed for us all really.
 
You do know the article does actually answer your question yeah?
"The other activist, Ms Bligh, said: "We've done this because there's no hope for the world, really.""

Why protest if there is no hope?

"Ms Lee added: "I believe he would approve because he was a good scientist and he would be following the science, and he would be as upset as us with the government for ignoring the science.""

It is not true that the government is ignoring the science. The government of the UK and the governments of most states accept the science of climate change. This is why the UK government is committed to cutting back the emission of greenhouse gases. The government is not doing enough, but does Just Stop Oil have an alternative programme?
 
"The other activist, Ms Bligh, said: "We've done this because there's no hope for the world, really.""

Why protest if there is no hope?

"Ms Lee added: "I believe he would approve because he was a good scientist and he would be following the science, and he would be as upset as us with the government for ignoring the science.""

It is not true that the government is ignoring the science. The government of the UK and the governments of most states accept the science of climate change. This is why the UK government is committed to cutting back the emission of greenhouse gases. The government is not doing enough, but does Just Stop Oil have an alternative programme?
You asked what they were trying to achieve - they clearly state what they ate trying to achieve. Whether you believe that it's effective is something else.

Ms Lee told the PA news agency: "We are trying to get the government to act on climate change. They are not doing enough."
 
Back
Top Bottom