Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Just found out a guy who works for me is being a git

I think the explanation is - So Mr Stupid, you have completed your assignment with us early so you will now return to India. Thanks!
That's so British:rolleyes: It was trial by urban. He should be given an urban sentence:mad:

I need to go pee again.:oops: I think I might have a urinary infection. I blame this thread:mad:
 
Pingu it is was not your use of the phrase or the context of it I was referring to. I still haven't put my kids gloves on this morning, so I will do that and as William says... More later ;):oops::eek:

FWIW and I can only go off your posts, Pingu, but I would have no problem with Pingu Enterprises Ltd.

Will explain more later... :):mad::p
 
Pingu it is was not your use of the phrase or the context of it I was referring to. I still haven't put my kids gloves on this morning, so I will do that and as William says... More later ;):oops::eek:

FWIW and I can only go off your posts, Pingu, but I would have no problem with Pingu Enterprises Ltd.

Will explain more later... :):mad::p
What have you done with the real firky? :mad: :p
 
And you thought that the fact that a rape happened there recently was good enough evidence to back up your assertion with? Because rape is definitely not a problem in Europe? Doesn't happen. Not 'real' rape anyway.

There's a recent UN report you could quote on why it's the worst place in the world to be a woman, if you're that desperate to play the ranking game.

Don't quite understand why you are getting so worked up ymu.
After the appalling rape there was a widescale protest not just about the rape but also about womens rights in India. It raised the issue that India has a bad record on womens rights much higher in the minds of the world, including among people like me - who rarely read UN reports.

eta: and I am not playing ANY ranking game.
 
Don't quite understand why you are getting so worked up ymu.
After the appalling rape there was a widescale protest not just about the rape but also about womens rights in India. It raised the issue that India has a bad record on womens rights much higher in the minds of the world, including among people like me - who rarely read UN reports.

eta: and I am not playing ANY ranking game.
Look at what you posted and the context you posted it in. It couldn't be much more insulting to women and Indian people if you tried. I know you're a complete sweetheart and you weren't trying to offend anyone, but perhaps try a bit harder not to? This article explains it quite well.
 
I think I owe Pingu a clarifcation and explanation to my objection at the phrase 'the Indian' on this thread. My coffee is brewing, I fixed the fuse on the coffee machine with a bit of tin foil so there's every-chance the switch will trip in the middle of a paragraph. Anyway...

As Manter has no doubt figure out it was directed at her. Although I feel a bit of a twat pulling you up like this, Man', I do feel you're totally out of order. You do not identify anyone as "the Indian", let alone refer to them as such. They're not a dog, athough you would think the guy was when you say things like this:

No, because in that case the Indian can't afford to eat while he is here....

You see I'd let that slip ordinarily but you use that turn of phrase more than once on this thread. I am not about to go through and find them all again but your repeated use of this phrase is what I took objection to. Also I notice a bit of a pattern to some of your posts. I don't know if you are aware but Urban is a predominately left wing board, people come here, post year after year because it is a reminder that the world is not full of bigoted arseholes and there are people out there who are normal and well 'nice' to coin LP. It's not the first time you've done something that has been questionable.

Within the last six weeks or so you referred to your junior staff as "overheads" and yourself as "the revenue". Your explanation for that was you're in a foul mood but if you read it - people were really fucking pissed off you about that but did not what to pollute a legendary thread with further sewarge. Only nipsla (?) really said what a lot of people were thinking, everyone else kept their claws in. The other example is that of your bored and brain dead house wives, and something about you being a nice middle-class girl.Again I think you got away lightly with that one because it was in the Christmas forum.

Finally you call gentlegreen a misogynist. That's a very powerful world to throw around because someone doesn't like heels and (oddly) thinks women can't park in them or some such thing. Sexist, old fashioned and a bit odd, yes he is - but do you really think he'd have been around here and be as liked as he is if had some pathological hatred for women?

If we're going to throw words like that around with out thought then I call you a racist for referring to the guy Pingu employed as 'The Indian'. Why? Because it smells like someone who's smart enough to know that they can't get away with calling him a 'paki' but not smart enough to realise why their chosen phrase is objectionable.

To be honest I don't think you really 'get' what Urban is, what it's roots, what it stands for. That maybe diluted somewhat because of it's recent popularity, and it's more prominent posters leaving Urban for Facebook because people like you are starting to water it down.

Not going to chase you off the boards are hound you down, but I do think you need to have a think about what Urban is and how you fit into it. New comer of the year or not.

What have you done with the real firky?

Grew bored of acting I hear :hmm:
 
Look at what you posted and the context you posted it in. It couldn't be much more insulting to women and Indian people if you tried. I know you're a complete sweetheart and you weren't trying to offend anyone, but perhaps try a bit harder not to? This article explains it quite well.

I think you are being over prickely ymu, I did not suggest rape does not happen in the UK or USA for that matter - perhaps if I had emphasised the indian reaction to the rape rather than the rape itself you might have been less offended. But for me, it was the reaction to the rape that made me realise more about the state of women in India.

In the context of this thread, it was implied that Mr Stupid had his negative views on women because of cultural reasons, my intention was just to point out that - they may have a point - !
 
I think I owe Pingu a clarifcation and explanation to my objection at the phrase 'the Indian' on this thread.
........

Have to say, I could easily have used the term "the indian" on this thread without too much thought and am not so clear why it is offensive, I may be being slow but could you explain? When I have been abroad people have referred to me as "the englishman" or "englander" or "Pom" or whatever ..
 
Have to say, I could easily have used the term "the indian" on this thread without too much thought and am not so clear why it is offensive, I may be being slow but could you explain? When I have been abroad people have referred to me as "the englishman" or "englander" or "Pom" or whatever ..
only within your hearing.
 
As long as the French continue, as they so far have, to stop and help me when I break down or crash in their country they can call me what they like !! :)
Unless you're very touchy about 1066, that's not a big deal. It's a bit different when the country you're criticising for being fucked up is fucked up because it's poor, especially when it's poor in part because European colonialism robbed the region blind for a few centuries whilst promoting extreme chauvinism and violence as an ordinary tool of government.

Bit of respect is all that's being asked for. Too much to ask?
 
The Indian guy or such would have been fine, yes. As ymu points out.

Hmmm - not sure about this. I get the point about using Indian as an adjective rather than a noun (even though it is also a noun) but I suspect this is an instance when the motive to change the language used is predicated on the assumption that the user is a prejudiced dimwit. And yes, I know that's how language works (cf. coloured is offensive) but I'm not sure that we've reached the tipping point where this usage has become de facto offensive.

Also, Manter used "Lebanese guy" and "Nigerian guy" upthread.

BTW, I don't like lots of assumptions being made about me just because I'm a man. Perhaps I should start insisting people refer to me as the "English male human".
 
It made me feel uncomfortable to read it... I think firky is right to bring it up... although maybe racist is too strong, I dunno. Id like to think that Manter has shown a lack of judgement... Cant comment on the other threads as I haven't read them.

Sorry if this isnt put very well on a train!
 
Scrap what I said, that personal attack has reduced me to tears, I am horrified at being accused, absolutely without foundation, of racism, (i suspect you don't even believe it, i suspect you are deliberately being hurtful). While i know hormones doesn't leave me in the most calm and robust state, I should be focussing on more important things right now than defending myself against personal attacks. I liked and appreciated what I found on here-support, friendship, information-, but I can't deal with being called racist, a fucking sick fuck, sewage,and the other stuff that has been thrown at me for having the temerity to be on here and occasionally disagree with others. Some of what you call me up on is fair- I apologised to nipsla because she was quite right to call me on what I said. Most of the rest of it, I disagree with, but I am not robust enough right now to deal with a lunch mob who hate me just for who I am.
 
Yeah, sack the bastard. No trial, no investigation, no hearing. Show him this thread and let him know the u75 committee on political correctness has spoken.

Sorry for the sarcasm, but surely give the guy a chance to explain himself, a firm talking to, and a word of warning that he's on your radar?

Sounds like he's probably in violation of the "don't be a (sexist) dick" rule, but surely even sexist dicks deserve the right to be heard out, and given a chance to mend their dickish ways. He might need the job. He might have family to support. I'm not remotely in favour of sacking him outright. That would be the mark of a shit boss, someone who can't deal constructively with "interpersonal conflicts" within their team.

Please don't think I'm apologising for any sexism, or denying that it happened, but surely this board stands something other than sacking people based on here say?

I'm not known for my advocacy for employers, but in cases where racism, sexism etc are involved, employers are obliged to act fast, because if they don't, they too can be liable for that individual's behaviour. A swift talking-to now could potentially save them a lot of money down the line.
 
oooook...

erm....

shit.

reet. this side of the, I would love to say incident but its incidents, can be summarised as follows:

" Mr stupid" for that is what we shall continue to call him seems to think that by nature of him being male he is innately superior to women in general... and to one woman in particular - who just so happens to be the clients team leader for the team he is in.

today he made a comment to another one of our people that a woman should not be in charge of men.. its not natural. This was overheard by a member of the clients development team. this then found its way back to the team lead - lets call her "Ms angry and pissed off". It further transpires that "Mr stupid" has not followed several of her directions as he does not feel he should be taking instructions from her...

This has, up to now, been managed by the onsite team we have but this has now gone far beyond what they should be dealing with.

Now this guy is seconded from our Indian company so I need to be aware that there is possibly a cultural angle to this and not just "this guy is a total dick" so it may be able to be handled with some education. But his time on that client site is now over, I will be pulling him off site as per the clients request (which I will be getting tomorrow) and we will need to see what we can do about the attitude and if we can subsequently place him elsewhere or if he should be RTU'd

I will of course speak with him and get his side of things but if the client doesn't want him onsite then irrespective of anything else he is through on that site.

If he's a professional, then his nationality and possible cultural prejudices are immaterial - he should know how to act around clients, and how to follow the chain of command.
 
Back
Top Bottom