the button
out on the kocker
And from Gregg's rather than Pret. The indignity.Attacked with sandwiches and bags of crisps.
And from Gregg's rather than Pret. The indignity.Attacked with sandwiches and bags of crisps.
And from Gregg's rather than Pret. The indignity.
The Meal Deal of Oppression.Attacked with sandwiches and bags of crisps.
And from Gregg's rather than Pret. The indignity.
Disagree with the term "the Indian" if you like, but do you really think that means Manter is a secret racist?
Also I never said you were racist, it was more of a demonstration that if you throw words around with such powerful connotations then I'll show you an example likewise. A parody if you will.
(and firky explained that he used that as a vehicle to demonstrate how strong descriptors can be devalued when applied inappropriately)
Soon changed your tune about that when you were stuck working up near Sheffield.Disliking Northerners on the other hand.
Someone threw a Gregg's pasty at me. Now you can see through my head.
[Reports post to Urban's Head of Human Resources, Mr Firky ]Disliking Northerners on the other hand.
Soon changed your tune about that when you were stuck working up near Sheffield.
As far as I can see, it is only Manter making it into something it isn't. I didn't see anyone accuse her of racism, I did see people say it wasn't racist but it was iffy. She's the one who declared it an accusation of racism and promptly flounced.Different though the emphases of 201 and 202 are, both cesare and sam have it right. ^^ Fair enough picking up someone/anyone on language and whether that language does (or doesn't) represent real attitudes. But let's not make it into something it isn't.
I never called her a 'sick fuck' either.Is there some shit going down on other threads that I don't know about?
Of course. There always is.Is there some shit going down on other threads that I don't know about?
you'd loosen the thaisI want to do a joke about being attacked by a french horn and puff pastry but I'd undo everything I said on this thread.
I never called her a 'sick fuck' either.
The thais loosen
If we're going to throw words like that around with out thought then I call you a racist for referring to the guy Pingu employed as 'The Indian'. Why? Because it smells like someone who's smart enough to know that they can't get away with calling him a 'paki' but not smart enough to realise why their chosen phrase is objectionable.
'ark at you with your fancy french lingoOh choux off.
You ignored the conditional clause at the start of the sentence. You copy-pasted the text so there is no link for context.Come on, Firks, you posted this:
You did actually call her a racist - in those exact words. You didn't say "I could call you a racist," you said "I call you a racist." Manter's really not imagining that you called her a racist, is she?
Come on, Firks, you posted this:
You did actually call her a racist - in those exact words. You didn't say "I could call you a racist," you said "I call you a racist." Manter's really not imagining that you called her a racist, is she?
You ignored the conditional clause at the start of the sentence. You copy-pasted the text so there is no link for context.
What was the context?
Yes, I did. If we are going to throw words - in that instance misogynistic (aimed at GG because he thinks heels are horrible and women who can't wear them can't drive (?!) ) - around then I'll throw the same sort of rubbish back. I stand by that quote.
Just as GG isn't a misogynist, Man' isn't a racist. That is what is being said in my quote.
But then I had my own foul up of a very similar nature to "the Indian" this week (referring to "The elderly" and "the disabled").
Reduces people to one facet of themselves. Ought to be "elderly people" and "disabled people").Dare I ask...what's wrong with that?
You ignored the conditional clause at the start of the sentence. You copy-pasted the text so there is no link for context.
What was the context?
That's one way of interpreting it, but when you say ~"if you're going to call GG a misogynist, then I call you a racist," then, given that Manter did actually call GG a misogynist, you are also calling her a racist.
Why didn't you just PM your post to Manter? It wasn't just about the use of the word Indian - it was a (really negative) assessment of her whole character and telling her to think about whether she really fits in here. Why post that in public? To shame her?
Reduces people to one facet of themselves. Ought to be "elderly people" and "disabled people").
. But firky, the self-appointed moral arbiter.