nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Anyone seen this?
Utterly pathetic.Anyone seen this?
I don't remember an election like this one: the desperation; the extreme scaremongering. 1974 gets mentioned but even that election wasn't at all like this one.Utterly pathetic.
Not least because the SNP don't want to be ministers in a Labour-led administration. They haven't asked for the job and would be daft to accept if it was offered.
Did you see this?Fuck - That really is the kiss of death...!
there were two elections in 1974.I don't remember an election like this one: the desperation; the extreme scaremongering. 1974 gets mentioned but even that election wasn't at all like this one.
The Gordon Brown who isn't standing?Gordon Brown has just said a labour govt after the election would immediately release emergency funds for food banks, but isn't this just institutionalising food banks as a key welfare state tool?
The Gordon Brown who isn't standing?
Let's say he doesn't deliver this pledge he'll have no power to deliver, as an unelected citizen. Will we hold him to account by not not re-electing him?
good.It's really not going well for Scottish Labour http://www.theguardian.com/politics...-from-disillusionment-to-meltdown-in-scotland
They really can't see their own role in why people have deserted them, can they?It's really not going well for Scottish Labour http://www.theguardian.com/politics...-from-disillusionment-to-meltdown-in-scotland
did you see the reaction of the bent labour bloke who lost out to galloway after the bradford by election? (now theres a hobsons..but anyway). He was astonished and angry. Literally seemed to have no idea that a certain amount of shit sarnie-eating had been deemed too much shit, not enough bread by the electorate. Its an indication of the fact that labour take the votes for grantedThey really can't see their own role in why people have deserted them, can they?
Worth noting that it's the same location.Crowd for Nicola Sturgeon launching the SNP's 'women's pledge' in Glasgow this morning, for comparison
View attachment 70680
View attachment 70681
mm.
I know Allan Grogan, chief founder, went to the SSP.What happened to the Labour for Yes people have they all jumped ship to the Nats?
Seems particularly daft because if they want increase their share of the vote they are clearly going to have to be able to appeal to both YES and NO voters. Increasingly alienating such a large share of the vote seems utterly stupid, I can't believe that no one at central office hasn't pointed this basic fact out to them.It's clearly their strategy to push that line, but I think it's another mistake; for most of those Labour has lost, that wasn't their experience of the referendum. The Yes side report having felt a sense of empowerment, involvement, community, optimism and excitement that they hadn't experienced in politics before. So, where Labour is getting this emphasis on a negative experience from, I don't know: are they privately polling No voters?
Exactly my point. If they're limiting their ambitions to only the No voters they've lost, their ambitions are clearly very low. It looks very much to me like all they're aiming at is the tactical votes of the 15% of voters in Scotland who vote Tory.Seems particularly daft because they want increase their share of the vote they are clearly going to have to be able to appeal to both YES and NO voters. Increasingly alienating such a large share of the vote seems utterly stupid, I can't believe that no one at central office hasn't pointed this basic fact out to them.
Second paragraph is an interesting point. It's worth remembering that there is actually no such thing as "Scottish Labour"; for example, in a recent employment dispute the employee had to sue HQ on London, as the Scottish Party had no legal status as a separate entity. (Unlike the Tories in Scotland, who are the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party and a distinct though affiliated entity).I think Danny's right to say they have yet to begin grappling with the extent of, and reasons for, their unpopularity.
I think they should have started by reconstituting Scottish Labour as a new party run independently of the UK Labour party - and rejecting the politics of New Labour - but recognising the historical affiliations (similar to the SDLP/Labour relationship).
ha, when it suits them - the Bakers Union were told that although they are national affiliates, they never specifically affiliated to Labour in Scotland so couldn't have a vote in the union section of the leadership electionSecond paragraph is an interesting point. It's worth remembering that there is actually no such thing as "Scottish Labour"; for example, in a recent employment dispute the employee had to sue HQ on London, as the Scottish Party had no legal status as a separate entity. (Unlike the Tories in Scotland, who are the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party and a distinct though affiliated entity).
3m ago20:50
Senior figures in the Scottish Labour Party have demanded Jim Murphy resign after the election, according to the Telegraph. “A man who leads us to disaster in a general election has then got little prospect of leading us to enormous success in a Scottish election,” one Scottish Labour MP reportedly said.