Would you say you support them 100%? I've not got a problem with not supporting JC, I do have a problem with wilfully empty hyperbolic phrasesI support Scunthorpe united too but I haven't been to a match in years, you got a problem with that too?
Well yeh of course I support them 100%. I don't support any other team. I have no other "horse in the race". That's what I mean by "100%".Would you say you support them 100%? I've not got a problem with not supporting JC, I do have a problem with wilfully empty hyperbolic phrases
have you ever thought of bringing us something new instead of the remains of a many-times-reheated dog's dinner?
He has to hang on till after next conference at the very least - the party cant go through another challenge so soon after the last round of madness. (although i guess anything is possible)CORBYN OUT. CORBYN OUT.
ToshLike what? The problem isn’t going to go away by not mentioning it. The Labour Party is pointless if it doesn’t have a chance of forming a government and rebuilding the party is on hold until Corbyn goes.
Tosh
yesWhat, it can form the next Govt or it does still have a point even if it can't or the problem may go away if not mentioned or rebuilding is not on hold? So much to choose from.
Yeh, mind how you goOk, many thanks.
Copeland wasn't so good, but nothing to panic about.
Copeland wasn't so good, but nothing to panic about.
Voting for their jobs in Cumbria.Listening to Radio 4 interviewing life long Labour voters who voted against Corbyn should worry some people. It seems a lot of people weren't voting for the Tory party they were voting against the Labour leader.
Losing one by-election is not a catastrophe - sitting at 25%, and being 15+% behind the government, and your leader having a 16% approval rating while the PM has a 45+% approval rating, and those numbers being solid for the best part of a year however probably does count as being well within the 'something to panic about' box...
Disagree; if the PLP had their way they'd be able to select a leader who could easily accelerate their electoral decline.Agreed. But I don't see a change of leader making a blind bit of difference to this.
On that question - is there still any talk of purging the Blairites? Or has everything gone quiet on that front?Disagree; if the PLP had their way they'd be able to select a leader who could easily accelerate their electoral decline.
On that question - is there still any talk of purging the Blairites? Or has everything gone quiet on that front?
PASOKification required a Syriza.So it's not just PASOK or bust, it's PASOK and bust.
Absolutely. Labour's 1997 victory was inevitable, particularly after the defeat snatched from the jaws of victory in 1992. As political economy it was just more neo-liberalism, but a reset, in supposedly optimistic times. Newness playing out as inclusion - not equality - and an electoral cross class alliance in which the working class has nowhere else to go. Having said all that, Blair was a perfect embodiment of the project. But yes, that's not where we are now.Nah, it wasn't his personality. Blair was the result of the politics of the day, as Corbyn is now. You've got it the wrong way round.
Faster than this?Disagree; if the PLP had their way they'd be able to select a leader who could easily accelerate their electoral decline.
That's the heart of it. Corbynites haven't changed the Labour Party, so it just remains a party saying 'vote for us, we believe in how things used to be 40 years ago'. Why the fucking fuck would anybody believe them after decades of, that word again, abandonment. But nor have they made even a tiny step towards even thinking about becoming a social movement or, at an even more basic level, engaging with people's lives.PASOKification required a Syriza.