Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up

includes a link for this Britain’s two-party system is heading for multiple splits
not quite sure what precisely open v closed as opposed to left v right means, but you get a gist.

...redsquirrel asked the other day how much UKIP's soft vote might be hardening up....I guess it would need to for it to really go four ways...i think it will....UKIP arent treated like the BNP (by the media, and therefore by voters), though UKIP is basically a British nationalist party....actually an English nationalist party. I think UKIP vote will harden, despite losing voters back to Tories and Farage (hopefully) disappearing before too long.

That link suggests this will lead to growing pressure for proportional representation... I think thats probably true

UKIP are not English only they have an MEP from Scotland, and numerous assembly members in Wales. It's also worth noting that another reason they're not treated like the BNP is that they're clearly not hardcore racial nationalists but right wing populists with plenty of room for racist ideas and behaviour in practice, they also have plenty of black and Asian members.
 
UKIP are not English only they have an MEP from Scotland, and numerous assembly members in Wales. It's also worth noting that another reason they're not treated like the BNP is that they're clearly not hardcore racial nationalists but right wing populists with plenty of room for racist ideas and behaviour in practice, they also have plenty of black and Asian members.
I don't buy it.... Their selfproclaimed uniculturalism is an English one, and looking at some ukip twitter feeds last night just reinforced in my mind the sewer they swim in...right there with other less media friendly far right groups. They're not identical to bnp, and there's already been a good discussion on characterising them here on the boards, but for all the nuances and subtleties in my mind they're different sides of the same ugly coin.
 
I don't buy it.... Their selfproclaimed uniculturalism is an English one,
And yet they had higher share of the vote than PC in Wales at the 2015 GE, did worse than PC in the last Assembly elections and considerably better than PC in the 2014 Euro elections.

Share of the vote UKIP achieved at the 2014 EU elections by region
East Midlands 32.90
East of England 34.48
London 16.87
North East 29.19
North West 27.47
Scotland 10.46
South East 32.14
South West 32.29
Wales 27.55
West Midlands 31.49
Yorkshire and the Humber 31.13

Wales towards the bottom but you are splitting the pie five ways.
 
The socially conservative traditional working class, its habits and prejudices forged in the industrial era, is a fading irrelevance.

they're not, as the article makes clear.

fairplay, that's the challenge to those of us who are of the metropolitan elite, who have invested in the idealism that elsewhere has led to Podemas and who've been given a rude awakening over the last year or so. All sorts of fuzzy visions of a fairer, more inclusive, future have been dashed and we have to accept that those with other, socially conservative prejudices are in the ascendency. So what does the future look like? Are all communities who oppose development to be lauded, or only the gritty northern ones? Does every pub bore racist view become acceptable now? How can they reinstitute a proper market without muslims selling 'their stuff'?

The article describes the problems well enough, can anyone closer to the heartlands sketch out what this vision of "warmer, more inclusive politics of community where local cohesion doesn’t come at the expense of the outsider." actually means in practice, or are we to wait for Cruddas?
 
The article describes the problems well enough, can anyone closer to the heartlands sketch out what this vision of "warmer, more inclusive politics of community where local cohesion doesn’t come at the expense of the outsider." actually means in practice, or are we to wait for Cruddas?
winterval calendars where advent is extended to start at Diwali and finish sometime after New Years Eve, so we all benefit from the inclusion of the hindu festival into the calendar with longer to shop for Christmas with the lights on, 3 months of opening a chocolate in the morning. What's not to like?:hmm:
 
ps that actually is basically what happened in Newcastle for a while at least except without the extension of the advent calenders, which I think is where they cocked up.
 
Article in the I on UKIP and Stoke, some very alarming vox pops with ex labour voters, I was thinking Labour will just win it, but not too sure really.
 
yes, untill you get the odd scandal about care home abuses going on, you don't hear much. The unseen. This goes for distro warehouses nearly literally given the 6-2 2-10 10-6 shift patterns. 9 to fivers don't see much of these people outside of social events, pub visits with mates on those patterns etc.


The fact that much social care is now not unionised or many disabled and sick are on direct payments and hire their own care means that the client has little voice or has to fight on their own.
 
The fact that much social care is now not unionised or many disabled and sick are on direct payments and hire their own care means that the client has little voice or has to fight on their own.

To claim direct payments or individual budgets diminish disabled people's voices individually or collectively is daft.
 

Julian-Coman-003.jpg

Julian Coman
Julian Coman

Not heard of the journalist before, assistant editor, interested to see if if affects editorial, Sonia Sohda is current one.
 
Do expand, unions were a collective voice for clients, they may not have always been there, but it existed, centre closures, etc.

Yes like when they campaigned to keep detestable long stay hospitals for people with learning disabilities open.

Your point is valid, but only to a point. In house services have often been very restrictive to disabled people and poorly run. Replacing them with underfunded, poorly paid non-unionised care is obviously not the answer either. But no one in any sector has a monopoly on caring or fucking it up. Disabled people naturally trust themselves and the associations formed with other disabled people are also strong.
 
The article describes the problems well enough, can anyone closer to the heartlands sketch out what this vision of "warmer, more inclusive politics of community where local cohesion doesn’t come at the expense of the outsider." actually means in practice, or are we to wait for Cruddas?

For me, it means that electoral politics is dead in the water. The politics of voting 'least worst' has got us into this mess we find ourselves in. I've been doing stuff with some defend social housing stuff last few months - these are all Labour councils pushing through massive regeneration programmes that actually end up ripping the heart of working class communities, sending people to the other side of the country, and leading to barely any social housing. Corbyn and 'Labour left' ministers on one hand will wring their hands and speak to their social media fanbase about what we need to do urgently, whilst not even calling out the behaviour of their own councils. Easy to merely pass the buck onto the government of course (whilst obviously the shower of cunts are very much to blame too).

Whilst people on those estates see their already precarious work/employment conditions constantly eroded further and further. And, yes some of them have either dropped out of voting altogether, or flirt with UKIP, and when both your economic and social stability is threatened - especially by your local Labour 'co-operative' council, or watching Labour privatise everything with PFI schemes over many years, no amount of talk of 'opportunity' and 'progressiveness' from liberals will prevent people from lurching towards some reactionary attitudes. But they are 'attitudes' created out of capitalism and the dire social/economic situations people find themselves in, not because people are 'born racists', or naturally 'socially conservative' which appears to be the liberal and left-liberal sneery takedown and again, why we've ended up in this state of affairs.

And so, the only way to build any kind of inclusive politics of community and local cohesion now has to be fought and built right at the heart of those communities again. Where social and economic issues are a uniting factor across all people, not a dividing one. Where people of all races/genders/sexuality are again united by class and not divided by liberal identity politics. And certainly not looking to Labour, or Corbyn, or frankly any party on the 'pseudo-left' to actually do this hard work. This is the only way now towards genuine pro-working class, pro-socialist politics again.

(Which I realise doesn't necessarily offer any great solutions and is more of a rant of where we find ourselves in general. I've been doing what I can though - spending less time on here and going out trying to fight things on such a level but also trying to challenge/persuade people away from the lure of UKIP and reactionary politics where possible. It's difficult, often infuriating, but I never give up because I refuse to consign anybody on the rough end of being left behind our great neoliberal 'choice and opportunity for all' world (sponsored by Labour) to the shitheap.
 
How is it not clear? Look at the bloody world around us.

Not so clear Labour will lose. 27% of the electorate consistently say they will vote for them. They may all stay at home. They may not. They may vote UKIP. The voters of Stoke may have voted leave, but it doesn't mean those same voters find UKIP appealing.
 
For me, it means that electoral politics is dead in the water. The politics of voting 'least worst' has got us into this mess we find ourselves in. I've been doing stuff with some defend social housing stuff last few months - these are all Labour councils pushing through massive regeneration programmes that actually end up ripping the heart of working class communities, sending people to the other side of the country, and leading to barely any social housing. Corbyn and 'Labour left' ministers on one hand will wring their hands and speak to their social media fanbase about what we need to do urgently, whilst not even calling out the behaviour of their own councils. Easy to merely pass the buck onto the government of course (whilst obviously the shower of cunts are very much to blame too).
Bang on the money.

And good to see you again.
 
I can't see UKIP "walking it", Labour will throw everything they've got at it and while it's running out fast there's still an anti-UKIP voting factor. If UKIP win I think it'll be close.
 
For me, it means that electoral politics is dead in the water. The politics of voting 'least worst' has got us into this mess we find ourselves in. I've been doing stuff with some defend social housing stuff last few months - these are all Labour councils pushing through massive regeneration programmes that actually end up ripping the heart of working class communities, sending people to the other side of the country, and leading to barely any social housing. Corbyn and 'Labour left' ministers on one hand will wring their hands and speak to their social media fanbase about what we need to do urgently, whilst not even calling out the behaviour of their own councils. Easy to merely pass the buck onto the government of course (whilst obviously the shower of cunts are very much to blame too).

Yep. The belief that we've only got the choice of the two or three or four different electoral options, almost seems designed to keep "the likes of us" in our place, voting for slightly different iterations of the same type of cuntitude. Me, I see a way beyond this, but it's going to take hard work to convince people that the power is theirs, and doesn't belong "as of right" to the likes of Labour, the Tories, the Lib-Dems or even the 'Kippers.

Whilst people on those estates see their already precarious work/employment conditions constantly eroded further and further. And, yes some of them have either dropped out of voting altogether, or flirt with UKIP, and when both your economic and social stability is threatened - especially by your local Labour 'co-operative' council, or watching Labour privatise everything with PFI schemes over many years, no amount of talk of 'opportunity' and 'progressiveness' from liberals will prevent people from lurching towards some reactionary attitudes. But they are 'attitudes' created out of capitalism and the dire social/economic situations people find themselves in, not because people are 'born racists', or naturally 'socially conservative' which appears to be the liberal and left-liberal sneery takedown and again, why we've ended up in this state of affairs.

Here in sunny Tulse Hill, we've already had almost 4 years of Labour Cllrs stating that the denizens of my estate (about 70% council-tenanted, 30% leasehold and freehold) are home-owning, middle-class racists (laugh? I nearly did!), because we don't fit their ideas about the way the working class people on a council estate should act. "Sneery left-liberals" is an apt description of these cunts.

And so, the only way to build any kind of inclusive politics of community and local cohesion now has to be fought and built right at the heart of those communities again. Where social and economic issues are a uniting factor across all people, not a dividing one. Where people of all races/genders/sexuality are again united by class and not divided by liberal identity politics. And certainly not looking to Labour, or Corbyn, or frankly any party on the 'pseudo-left' to actually do this hard work. This is the only way now towards genuine pro-working class, pro-socialist politics again.

(Which I realise doesn't necessarily offer any great solutions and is more of a rant of where we find ourselves in general. I've been doing what I can though - spending less time on here and going out trying to fight things on such a level but also trying to challenge/persuade people away from the lure of UKIP and reactionary politics where possible. It's difficult, often infuriating, but I never give up because I refuse to consign anybody on the rough end of being left behind our great neoliberal 'choice and opportunity for all' world (sponsored by Labour) to the shitheap.

If "choice" truly were choice, I'd be happy to give it a chance, but all "choice" means for the likes of me, is a choice to sink or swim. The few opportunities we have, are those we make for ourselves. Round here, that means an attempt to form an independent alternative to Labour in the wards - not to "take power", but to show people that they can, if they want, spend their votes on people whose political raison d'etre is to carry out the will of the people, rather than the policies of the party. Maybe we'll crash and burn - given the amount of shit thrown by Labour at the Greens at our last ward by-election (Gipsy Hill), that's a strong possibility - but just maybe we'll take enough seats on the council to at least make the term "opposition" credible in Lambeth once again, and if we can do that HERE, where can't we (the people) do it?

PS, thanks for the card. ;)
 
I can't see UKIP "walking it", Labour will throw everything they've got at it and while it's running out fast there's still an anti-UKIP voting factor. If UKIP win I think it'll be close.

The problem for Labour is that what they've "got" and what they can throw, mostly depends on convincing people to continue voting "tribally", almost in spite of what their head might tell them to do. Convincing people to act against their own perceived interests is ALWAYS a hard slog.
 
For me, it means that electoral politics is dead in the water. The politics of voting 'least worst' has got us into this mess we find ourselves in. I've been doing stuff with some defend social housing stuff last few months - these are all Labour councils pushing through massive regeneration programmes that actually end up ripping the heart of working class communities, sending people to the other side of the country, and leading to barely any social housing. Corbyn and 'Labour left' ministers on one hand will wring their hands and speak to their social media fanbase about what we need to do urgently, whilst not even calling out the behaviour of their own councils. Easy to merely pass the buck onto the government of course (whilst obviously the shower of cunts are very much to blame too).

Whilst people on those estates see their already precarious work/employment conditions constantly eroded further and further. And, yes some of them have either dropped out of voting altogether, or flirt with UKIP, and when both your economic and social stability is threatened - especially by your local Labour 'co-operative' council, or watching Labour privatise everything with PFI schemes over many years, no amount of talk of 'opportunity' and 'progressiveness' from liberals will prevent people from lurching towards some reactionary attitudes. But they are 'attitudes' created out of capitalism and the dire social/economic situations people find themselves in, not because people are 'born racists', or naturally 'socially conservative' which appears to be the liberal and left-liberal sneery takedown and again, why we've ended up in this state of affairs.

And so, the only way to build any kind of inclusive politics of community and local cohesion now has to be fought and built right at the heart of those communities again. Where social and economic issues are a uniting factor across all people, not a dividing one. Where people of all races/genders/sexuality are again united by class and not divided by liberal identity politics. And certainly not looking to Labour, or Corbyn, or frankly any party on the 'pseudo-left' to actually do this hard work. This is the only way now towards genuine pro-working class, pro-socialist politics again.

(Which I realise doesn't necessarily offer any great solutions and is more of a rant of where we find ourselves in general. I've been doing what I can though - spending less time on here and going out trying to fight things on such a level but also trying to challenge/persuade people away from the lure of UKIP and reactionary politics where possible. It's difficult, often infuriating, but I never give up because I refuse to consign anybody on the rough end of being left behind our great neoliberal 'choice and opportunity for all' world (sponsored by Labour) to the shitheap.


Thankyou for taking the time, I was beginning to think no-one had any clue at all. I don't disagree with you on very much of that tbh, though I've been told electoral politics are dead- and Labour the problem- throughout my adult life and they appear to me to be still going strong.

they are 'attitudes' created out of capitalism and the dire social/economic situations people find themselves in, not because people are 'born racists', or naturally 'socially conservative' which appears to be the liberal and left-liberal sneery takedown and again, why we've ended up in this state of affairs.

sure, but liberal social and economic policies have to be seen against the backdrop of capitalist technological globalisation. Earlier phases of which brought the canal, railway, foreign cotton and a much bigger workforce to somewhere like Rochdale, but more recent changes have left the swollen population with little economic reason to be there. Raw cotton is no longer imported for them to make into textiles for us southerners to buy, the manufacturing is now done closer to where the stuff is grown, or where labour is cheapest. It's reasonable to blame the Labour party or left/liberals for their responses to those changes, but they're not wholly responsible for the underlying engines of change. Nothing was inevitable, but technology can't be uninvented and third world populations couldn't be expected to remain drudge producers of raw materials forever just so people in Rochdale could have decent, skilled jobs. So no, left-liberal sneery takedown is not why we've ended up in this state of affairs.

We are where we are and the next phase appears to be robotics, automation and AI. That won't help the woman in the pub who wants to wind the clock back 25 years either.

The academic quoted says that the "“foundational economy” – provision of essential goods like health, education, social care, utilities, refuse collection, transport, prisons and food distribution – constitutes by far the biggest source of employment in many towns".

Capital has little need for a mass workforce to make or produce stuff in former industrial towns that once thrived. Production has moved elsewhere and dragged a workforce to it. There are, however, signs that the EU born workforce is diminishing. Are the white w/c of Rochdale going to be prepared to move elsewhere to harvest lettuces or gut fish? There's no reason why they should, but no reason why they shouldn't either. Their forebears moved to Rochdale for work, just as neighbours moved from Pakistan, Trinidad or Latvia.

and therein lies the problem. it's all very well for journalists to go out and provide sketches of people grumbling about stuff and to try to draw out those examples into a narrative. This journalist, like many on here and elsewhere, has focussed on the traditional, mostly white, working class living in industrial areas that have lost the economic relevance they once had. He's described some of the people he met, and their attitudes, well enough. Their attitudes matter, of course they do, (though he appears to have made no attempt to discover the attitudes of the local Asian heritage population or EU born people in Rochdale or Wigan, they matter too). But he/we need to dig deeper than that: what shape of society can realistically be built around those attitudes? We ain't going back to the glory days of working in mass manufacturing mills or factories. It's easy to say that electoral politics is dead or that capitalism should be overthrown but that doesn't provide a particularly realistic pointer to the shape of society in 5 years time.

I don't have any answers, but equally, I don't see reading nasty drivel like the market is "full of tat and loads of rabbit-hutch stalls run by Muslims with their stuff” and accepting that somehow post-Brexit society should reflect attitudes like that.
 
It's easy to say that electoral politics is dead or that capitalism should be overthrown but that doesn't provide a particularly realistic pointer to the shape of society in 5 years time.
So we should just join you in supporting the cuts to local councils your party is making?
 
So we should just join you in supporting the cuts to local councils your party is making?
what?
ftr I oppose cuts (& capitalism) and have never been a member of a political party. Not once not ever.

why the personal attack, why not discuss sensibly?
 
For me, it means that electoral politics is dead in the water. The politics of voting 'least worst' has got us into this mess we find ourselves in. I've been doing stuff with some defend social housing stuff last few months - these are all Labour councils pushing through massive regeneration programmes that actually end up ripping the heart of working class communities, sending people to the other side of the country, and leading to barely any social housing. Corbyn and 'Labour left' ministers on one hand will wring their hands and speak to their social media fanbase about what we need to do urgently, whilst not even calling out the behaviour of their own councils. Easy to merely pass the buck onto the government of course (whilst obviously the shower of cunts are very much to blame too).

Whilst people on those estates see their already precarious work/employment conditions constantly eroded further and further. And, yes some of them have either dropped out of voting altogether, or flirt with UKIP, and when both your economic and social stability is threatened - especially by your local Labour 'co-operative' council, or watching Labour privatise everything with PFI schemes over many years, no amount of talk of 'opportunity' and 'progressiveness' from liberals will prevent people from lurching towards some reactionary attitudes. But they are 'attitudes' created out of capitalism and the dire social/economic situations people find themselves in, not because people are 'born racists', or naturally 'socially conservative' which appears to be the liberal and left-liberal sneery takedown and again, why we've ended up in this state of affairs.

And so, the only way to build any kind of inclusive politics of community and local cohesion now has to be fought and built right at the heart of those communities again. Where social and economic issues are a uniting factor across all people, not a dividing one. Where people of all races/genders/sexuality are again united by class and not divided by liberal identity politics. And certainly not looking to Labour, or Corbyn, or frankly any party on the 'pseudo-left' to actually do this hard work. This is the only way now towards genuine pro-working class, pro-socialist politics again.

(Which I realise doesn't necessarily offer any great solutions and is more of a rant of where we find ourselves in general. I've been doing what I can though - spending less time on here and going out trying to fight things on such a level but also trying to challenge/persuade people away from the lure of UKIP and reactionary politics where possible. It's difficult, often infuriating, but I never give up because I refuse to consign anybody on the rough end of being left behind our great neoliberal 'choice and opportunity for all' world (sponsored by Labour) to the shitheap.
I think this is bang on - in terms of what you take from the article and your conclusion as to why electoral politics can't be the answer. I've droned on several times about the 'failure' of Corbyn/Momentum, thinking about it in these terms. It's a warmed up social democratic vision that would be infinitely better than what we have, at least if it was possible to insert a social democratic UK government into a neo-liberal international order. But that's not the issue. Labour actually needs to not just 'engage with' it's 'base' and all that stuff. It needs to be part of that struggle and really be part of actual communities. And whether you describe it as Blatchford's vision or something else, they aren't doing it. When he was elected and there thousands flocking to meetings - 100,000s actually joining - that was the moment to say 'right, we're going to do something different, escape from all the parliamentary cretinism, rediscover real life'. Never happened.

To be pedantic, as an anarchist or whatever, I was never going to be on board for some kind of social democratic party combined with wider social movement, even if it had happened. Too many contradictions and the logic of parliament and capital always wins out and screws the base. But my point is that if Corbynism was to ever have a chance that was at least prerequisite. Yes, okay the leadership have had to find plenty of internal battles, but there's just no sense that they have accepted politics should be away from parliament and council chamber. And of course it's not surprising, most of Labour's new members are not in a (social) position to engage with working class life. Without that link to real life the Labour Party are just repeating the same mantras they deployed against Thatcher, but with awkward words like class pushed to the background. It's really shit as a political strategy, but as it says in the article the only group Labour has any organic links to are the liberal middle classes. At the moment Labour is more a party of middle class grievance than working class politics (a sentence that works just as well without the first 3 words).
 
Back
Top Bottom