you can rent an mp, i am unsure whether you can buy one
What problem do the tories have?
Surely this will only really matter in marginals, if at all? May has a 30,000 majority - nothing is touching that.Well if you voted leave yesterday when your constituents voted remain for example-like zac goldsmith remember him.There are over 50 tories in that pickle ,may,hammond,redwood ,osborne,my mp etc etc-not sure how many labour -well.corbyn,hoey,chuka,thornberry,starmer,harman etc.
Well if you voted leave yesterday when your constituents voted remain for example-like zac goldsmith remember him.There are over 50 tories in that pickle ,may,hammond,redwood ,osborne,my mp etc etc-not sure how many labour -well.corbyn,hoey,chuka,thornberry,starmer,harman etc.
It's done as a referendum and despite some random farting in the house of lords, it will be in parliament. It's done in the sense that it's going to happen. But beyond that, my feeling is that while the negotiations may come unstuck, they are unlikely to play out in ways that advantage Labour. There's always the 'opposition looks good when governments fuck up' thing, but my sense is that Labour are so disconnected from any movements in voter opinion that they can't really build anything on such governmental fuck ups.Brexit isn't done. Its just starting, headaches yet to emerge.
sorry, your hypothosis ignores a rather important fact - that Tory remain voters have either reconciled themselves to Brexit, or take the view that Labour/LD's/UKIP are a bigger no-no than a brexiting Tory government.
the tories could simply not be polling 40+% month-in, month-out if remainers who voted tory in 2015 had got the hump and fucked off.
the tories do not have the same problem as Labour, they have different problems and the timescale for those problems hoving into view is different - but the problem they do not appear to have is tory voting remainersdeserting the party in any great numbers.
Brexit isn't done. Its just starting, headaches yet to emerge.
It's done as a referendum and despite some random farting in the house of lords, it will be in parliament. It's done in the sense that it's going to happen. But beyond that, my feeling is that while the negotiations may come unstuck, they are unlikely to play out in ways that advantage Labour. There's always the 'opposition looks good when governments fuck up' thing, but my sense is that Labour are so disconnected from any movements in voter opinion that they can't really build anything on such governmental fuck ups.
how can it advantage Labour when they 3 lined whipped giving the government a blank cheque.
Brexit is done politically - there will undoubtedly be issues arising from Brexit to be mopped up, but Brexit is done. much like 2016, its over, we may squabble about what we think of it and the way it affects 2017 and beyond, but its done. over. gone.
Erm, I agree. But to me Labour's weakness on Brexit is still a playing out of their bigger weakness in terms of who they are, what they believe in and who they engage with.how can it advantage Labour when they 3 lined whipped giving the government a blank cheque.
But every time we don't get a deal or there's talk of tariffs and Corbyn pops up to berate May, she'll give it the 'I take no lessons from the Rt Hon gentleman...' line, aka 'are you fucking joking, you, couldn't run a fucking whelk stall, shadow cabinet' etc.That the remainers deluded themselves for over six months that it could be stopped is part of the problem. That was political capital spent at the expense of ensuring Brexit could be properly managed. Chances are it won't be and as such it isn't done and gone.
... or, to put it another way, I don't see Keir Starmer drawing the crowds to a 'yes, you all voted for Brexit, but will you join us in a campaign against the government's handling of it?'
Thats le farages job tho if she does what he wants he can go back to america.
Who despite having a fraction of his predecessor's chops, is likely to end up doing the one thing he's never managed - win a Westminster seat.(isn't int interesting that we're completely ignoring UKIP's new leader, that nice Mr Nutter...)
Who despite having a fraction of his predecessor's chops, is likely to end up doing the one thing he's never managed - win a Westminster seat.
Stoke I think.are you thinking Stoke or do you think he'll just go for every Labour by-election north of Watford and that at some point it will pay off?
If he doesn't even come close, UKIP is overWho despite having a fraction of his predecessor's chops, is likely to end up doing the one thing he's never managed - win a Westminster seat.
Stoke I think.
I would be hesitant to predict the end of UKIP tbh.
What is the point of it now?
Political systems always need swivel eyed dishonest grasping cunts. FFS, expenses don't spend themselves!What is the point of it now?
What is the point of it now?