Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Jeremy Corbyn's time is up

That being said, why is James Schneider on Newsnight as Corbyn's spokesperson? Not sure if having someone who is both privately educated and so young vs Stephen Kinnock looks great, makes the leadership look unserious.

The leadership is pretty relaxed about private, or at least privileged, education. How could they not be?
 
The interview on HS2 that the ex shadow transport minister was using as part of her justification of resigning.

NEW Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has told the New Journal that he backs spending on high-speed rail, but will urge the government to investigate terminating a new north-south railway before it reaches Euston.

With confusion reigning at the Labour Party conference in Brighton as to how the party now views a £50billion spend on the High Speed 2 project from London to Birmingham and the North, we tracked down Mr Corbyn, his shadow chancellor John McDonnell and new shadow transport secretary Lilian Greenwood.

The rail scheme threatens at least a decade of demolition and disruption in Camden.

Hampstead and Kilburn MP Tulip Siddiq has already vowed to break the Labour Party whip if she is told to support it in the House of Commons, while Holborn and St Pancras MP Keir Starmer says the only realistic chance of the project being dumped is if the Labour Party applies pressure on the government by opposing it.

While some opponents object to the massive spend on the project in its entirety, at a time when public services are stretched for funding, others seeking a compromise deal want the new link to terminate at Old Oak Common, a development site close to Wormwood Scrubs prison, rather than smashing a path through to Euston at the cost of homes and businesses in Camden.

Mr Corbyn, speaking to the New Journal at a seafront hotel on Tuesday, said he still needed to sit down with his shadow cabinet to discuss the party policy on HS2, adding that he wanted to “look very seriously” at the idea of stopping the line at Old Oak Common.

He said: “I support them [people in Camden] in trying to protect Euston. I want us to look very seriously at the Old Oak Common option. I can see a lot of problems with the Euston option because of the number of passengers who will be going on to the underground from there.”

He added: “I will meet with Keir Starmer to discuss this and we will meet further with the shadow cabinet to discuss this as well.”

His response, neither a ringing endorsement nor a full frontal opposition to HS2, did not match the unequivocal enthusiasm for the project from Ms Greenwood, who told a fringe meeting on Monday afternoon: “I am happy to say that Labour does support HS2. It is clear we are in favour of HS2 and Jeremy supports that view.”

She added: “That’s not to say the project cannot still be improved. There is still work to do – particularly around Euston – to make sure it lives up to the aspirations of Camden, and prepares for the impact on the community. It cannot be at the expense of other rail schemes.”
LABOUR IN BRIGHTON: Corbyn says yes to high speed rail but raises alarm over HS2's final stop in Euston | Camden New Journal

Looks to me like Corbyn pretty much said the same thing as Greenwood, just went a bit further on discussing the options he thought should be considered around Old Oak Common, and saying that this still needed discussing at cabinet.

If anything it looks like she jumped the gun in thinking her view was the official collective view of the party leadership if it hadn't been discussed at a cabinet meeting. Collective responsibility surely means that sort of thing should be discussed before being viewed as official policy, discussions with policy head or leader would be just that. That's probably how Corbyn would have viewed it anyway.
 
This post cropped up on a facebook page. Have no idea if it is the real story but it sounds plausible.


******************************************************************
Please read and share this Exposé on Owen Smith MP

Owen Smith MP, who is challenging Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the Labour Party, has a lot of dirty linen that he does not want washed in public. Luckily, I have brought my own box of Daz.

I have it on very good authority (from someone within the Blarite Labour camp, who is disgusted by the behind-the-scenes secret-deals, funny handshakes, and distain for the voters), of the following:

1. Owen Smith is actually the original perpetrator of the challenge to Jeremy Corbyn (and has been for a very time). The agenda for the leadership challenge was set up in April! Yes, that’s right, April and not July. Angela Eagle was brought in as a ruse, to make Owen look good. Eagle actually believed that she had a chance. She had none. This was a coup d'état with only a few of the players in the know. Angela Eagle was not one of them. She was deliberately led down the garden path to make mistakes and look foolish (and didn’t she rise to the challenge). Owen Smith’s agenda during the interview with Eagle on the recent BBC news show is obvious for all to see. When Owen indicated that: “He would withdraw from the contest if Ms Eagle won more support among Labour MPs”, you could almost see him snigger. Smith already knew the agenda was set. He already knew who his supporters were and also those of Eagle. So, the interview was merely play-acting on his part.

2. Owen Smith had always intended to split the Labour Party (right from the beginning). Apparently, Owen Smith believes he can head Jeremy Corbyn off at the pass. It goes something like this: should Corbyn win, none of the MP’s will take cabinet positions (this has already been decided by those in the know). Smith believes that by doing this, it will split the party in two. This is what he wants. Smith realises that Jeremy has so much grass-roots support, that he is unable to successfully win in that quarter. However, a split party is a weakened party and he intends to take full advantage of it.

3. Many of the Blairite MP’s have been offered powerful positions and sweetheart deals, should they vote against Corbyn. It is extremely hush-hush and it does explain why so many MP’s suddenly went against Corbyn. Those who sat on the fence eventually decided to support ANYBODY other than Corbyn. I would suggest that once Jeremy Corbyn gets in, that the bank accounts and behind-the-scene deals of these MP’s are investigated. The whole system that they are involved in is so incredibly corrupt.

4. As many of you know, Smith was a lobbyist for Pfizer. As Head of Policy and Government Relations for Pfizer, Owen Smith was also directly involved in Pfizer’s funding of Blairite right-wing entryist group Progress. Pfizer gave Progress £53,000. Progress has actively pursued the agenda of PFI and privatisation of NHS services.

Pfizer is among the world's largest pharmaceutical companies. Big Pharma seeks enormous profits over the health and well-being of the humans it serves, and these drug companies invasively corrupt the way that the healthcare industry delivers its vital services. Corrupt being the operative word.

So, why was Owen involved with an American company? Well, Owen Smith is on record as saying that: “.... Pfizer had been “extremely supportive” of his aspirations to public office”. Make of that what you will.

Well, I am sure that Pfizer would love to get their toe in the door of the British NHS and Owen is their man to do just that!

During his time as chief lobbyist for Pfizer, Owen Smith actively pushed for privatisation of NHS services. Therefore, we know that the NHS will definitely not be safe in his hands. Should he become leader of the Labour Party, it will only be a matter of time before he will use his influence to start the process for privatisation of the NHS.

What we will end up with is something akin to the American system, where you will need to show your credit card (or insurance papers), before receiving treatment. Americans (rich and poor), have to find ways of paying for their very expensive treatments, should they get sick. This is our future, should Owen Smith become leader of the Labour Party.

And, if you think things could not get dirtier, Owen Smith is a strong supporter of Trident and assiduously courts the arms industry. He is a regular at defence industry events.

This is dirty dealing, folks. THIS is what we will get should Smith rise to power. If you value your future and well-being of your family, then you must do everything you can to ensure that he cannot continue his corrupt agenda. If he gains leadership, we really can say goodbye to the NHS and a whole lot more.

Please share this message as far and wide as you can, since the people need to know what is going on.
 
Why would Blairite MPs need to be offered anything to vote against Corbyn?
Voting no-confidence in Corbyn is utterly absurd by any reasonable measure and treacherous. I think it's important to take a step back and realise that groups just do not behave in such a way unless they are corrupted somehow.
 
Do Labour intend to overturn EVEL? Because if not, Owen Smith, were he to become PM, would not be able to vote on his own government's health or education policies.
 
killer b is right of course -- I was going to add anyway myself that there's a fuck load of speculation in there. Circumstantial stuff, light on actual evidence.

Maybe not complete bollocks though? Thought it was worth a read whatever.
 
killer b is right of course -- I was going to add anyway myself that there's a fuck load of speculation in there. Circumstantial stuff, light on actual evidence.

Maybe not complete bollocks though? Thought it was worth a read whatever.
There's no evidence at all. It's not speculation. It claims to be the inside story which it either is or isn't.
 
killer b is right of course -- I was going to add anyway myself that there's a fuck load of speculation in there. Circumstantial stuff, light on actual evidence.

Maybe not complete bollocks though? Thought it was worth a read whatever.
You know how conspiracy theories take hold right? They take some known fact, then whip em all up with some plausible (and not so plausible) speculation. It's going to be really tedious the next few days as people triumphantly post this made up story all over the shop as if it's check mate. I doubt even the canary would print this, it's so empty of facts.
 
It doesn't read like an insider expose, in part because it lacks focus. Especially the second half is just a mishmash of already well discussed factoids, taken somewhat out of context.

For example the following:

So, why was Owen involved with an American company? Well, Owen Smith is on record as saying that: “.... Pfizer had been “extremely supportive” of his aspirations to public office”. Make of that what you will.

That was from his first disastrous attempt to become an MP in a by-election. Since he was still working for Pfizer at the time of the campaign it was just a standard canned response to questions about that dynamic. Thats not to say I trust him with NHS decisions at all or think his Pfizer history is irrelevant, but that particular quote is hardly a useful part of a focussed insider expose.
 
Aside from the valid cynicism already expressed above, to believe that post is accurate, wouldn't you have to accept that Owen Smith is it - that Eagle was a stalking horse for this... guinea pig?

The Blairites' sheer arrogance may yet be their undoing, but I still find it hard to believe they don't have anyone more plausible than this up their sleeves. It seems much more likely that the real candidate, whoever it was, has quietly and wisely withdrawn back into the shadows after seeing the widespread scorn and derision the two declared candidates' bids have attracted from their electorate. Unlike Eagle, Smith does at least seem to have some sort of plan beyond blankly repeating what gender he is and which part of the country he's from, but surely to fuck he's not their secret weapon?
 
There's no evidence at all. It's not speculation. It claims to be the inside story which it either is or isn't.
it isn't. someone has worked up the stuff that's already been doing the rounds of twitter etc and sprinkled it with a bit of guess work. there's no detail whatsoever that suggests it came from anyone in the know and most of the points don't seem like the sort of thing a Blairite insider would raise anyway.
 
Aside from the valid cynicism already expressed above, to believe that post is accurate, wouldn't you have to accept that Owen Smith is it - that Eagle was a stalking horse for this... guinea pig?

The Blairites' sheer arrogance may yet be their undoing, but I still find it hard to believe they don't have anyone more plausible than this up their sleeves. It seems much more likely that the real candidate, whoever it was, has quietly and wisely withdrawn back into the shadows after seeing the widespread scorn and derision the two declared candidates' bids have attracted from their electorate. Unlike Eagle, Smith does at least seem to have some sort of plan beyond blankly repeating what gender he is and which part of the country he's from, but surely to fuck he's not their secret weapon?
Now you know why they wanted to keep it secret
 
It doesn't read like an insider expose, in part because it lacks focus. Especially the second half is just a mishmash of already well discussed factoids, taken somewhat out of context.

For example the following:



That was from his first disastrous attempt to become an MP in a by-election. Since he was still working for Pfizer at the time of the campaign it was just a standard canned response to questions about that dynamic. Thats not to say I trust him with NHS decisions at all or think his Pfizer history is irrelevant, but that particular quote is hardly a useful part of a focussed insider expose.

Also "why was Owen involved with an American company?" Is ridiculous - Pfizer uk have a couple of thousand uk employees.

You could say similar things about someone who had worked for any multinational employer.

Alex
 
I knew it was bollocks when it said at the beginning that the challenge actually began behind the scenes in April ('April!'). John Mann has recently gone on the record to say he was approached 6 months ago to back Owen Smith in a leadership challenge, which he declined to do.
 
Local TUSC member proclaiming on the local "news" page on Facebook that there will be a 'huge' rally for Corbyn on the weekend - 150-200 to attend, they've been liaising with the police...
"Come along and hear over 7 Trade Union and Socialist Party speakers".
Over 7!

Same guy predicts Corbyn will win and return Labour to socialism.
 
55,000 have signed up so far despite the £25, apparently. The party coffers will certainly benefit, even if no one else does.
 
Back
Top Bottom