Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Elon Musk the greatest visionary or the greatest snake oil salesman of our age?

Tesla and Chinese rivals signal EV price war truce in ‘socialist values’ pledge - Financial Times (archived)

Elon Musk’s Tesla has joined Chinese automakers in pledging to enhance “core socialist values”
and compete fairly in the country’s car market after Beijing directed the industry to rein in a months-long price war.

The version on the front page of the print edition includes this (missing from the online version)

Elon Musk says he is ''actually a socialist''


Despite this, he has previously posted on Twitter that he is “a socialist”, writing in 2018: “By the way, I am actually a socialist. Just not the kind that shifts resources from most productive to least productive, pretending to do good, while actually causing harm. True socialism seeks greatest good for all."

Tesla declined to comment on the pledge. The Chinese market is very valuable to the company, accounting for just under one-third of annual sales.

🤣🤣
 
Test (just a link to a random guardian 'thread' to see how it shows up here/what it links to in-browser):


Also has a 'get embed code' option but couldn't work it out before looking at the clock and realising I'm posting pointless shit on urban instead of doing stuff I have to do.
 
That, basically. Apps let you be much more intrusive. I guess they might change their mind on this one but probably not.

They’ll promise something I’m sure but the priority is an app to lock you in and slurp as much sweet data in as possible, even when you go to websites via the app.


General PSA:

If your downloading a third party app remove as many permissions in your phone settings as possible and always try to use a browser instead, incognito mode if possible

Not always possible I know
 
This might be a daft question but is there a practical (rather than philosophical/political) reason why I shouldn't just let them get on with trying to target ads etc. with my data?

I mean, superficially, I really don't give a fuck if they know I've been browsing Urban and the football gossip. No skin off my nose as it were.
 
This might be a daft question but is there a practical (rather than philosophical/political) reason why I shouldn't just let them get on with trying to target ads etc. with my data?

I mean, superficially, I really don't give a fuck if they know I've been browsing Urban and the football gossip. No skin off my nose as it were.

The weirdest things can keep you from getting a job. I saw a story the other day, where a woman forgot to return a video years ago. For years, she wondered why she couldn't get a decent job. Turned out that the video company had filed theft charges against her. It kept showing up in background checks until they actually arrested her for it recently.

I'm pretty sure employers will be accessing this data, if they aren't already, and making hiring decisions based on it.
 
Last edited:
This might be a daft question but is there a practical (rather than philosophical/political) reason why I shouldn't just let them get on with trying to target ads etc. with my data?

I mean, superficially, I really don't give a fuck if they know I've been browsing Urban and the football gossip. No skin off my nose as it were.
Very much yes for your first para i.e there are philosophical (and I would dare say spiritual/metephetaphysical) and political objections, but a no for your second para
 
Last edited:
The weirdest things can keep you from getting a job. I saw a story the other day, where a woman forgot to return a video years ago. For years, she wondered why she couldn't get a decent job. Turned out that the video company had filed theft charges against her. It kept showing up in background checks until they actually arrested her for it recently.

I'm pretty sure employers will be accessing this data, if they aren't already, and making hiring decisions based on it.
Oh I know they are. In my line of work it's pretty up front. We kinda have to take that as read now.

I'm more interested in the background data collection, the stuff harvested in the multimillions of browser hits, clicks and so on. What are the practical implications of this?
 
Oh I know they are. In my line of work it's pretty up front. We kinda have to take that as read now.

I'm more interested in the background data collection, the stuff harvested in the multimillions of browser hits, clicks and so on. What are the practical implications of this?
None. Freedom to use them, freedom to not use them.

But there's so many layers to it. I'm rereading Heidegger at the moment and his work for example throws up so much praxis and thought in regards where we are at with this stuff.
 
The weirdest things can keep you from getting a job. I saw a story the other day, where a woman forgot to return a video years ago. For years, she wondered why she couldn't get a decent job. Turned out that the video company had filed theft charges against her. It kept showing up in background checks until they actually arrested her for it recently.

I'm pretty sure employers will be accessing this data, if they aren't already, and making hiring decisions based on it.
In the UK we at least get to see what they might have on us
 
This might be a daft question but is there a practical (rather than philosophical/political) reason why I shouldn't just let them get on with trying to target ads etc. with my data?
Yes. You are a human being, whose brain has evolved to respond in certain ways to certain cues. With this data, they aren’t just cleverly anticipating demand. They are manufacturing demand. And you’re not immune from that process just because you know about it and you’re self-aware and clever. Clever people are arguably more vulnerable to the process. You think you made the decision to buy goods or services just because the time was somehow right? The more somebody knows about you, the more they can curate your subjectivity.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I know.

...but do I care? is it any worse (on a practical, everyday level) than the less sophisticated ways of manufacturing demand that have existed all my life?
Yes, because it is focused at and supremely good at forming an atomised neoliberal subjectivity, whose anxiety and alienation are the origin of the demand they are manufacturing. Advertisers have always tried to do this, sure, but they’ve previously been comparatively weak at succeeding.
 
I'm happy to see targeted ads rather than non-targeted ads. Might see something I want. Can deal with buying shit I don't need, been doing it all my life.
 
One of the things I’ve enjoyed about looking at twitter lately is the absolutely dire state of their advertising. It didn’t used to be like this at all; for months all I seem to get is the same very few and very shitty adverts.
 
A thing that one should always remember about data gathering is that it's not all about you. In fact the greater significance is when it's not about you, but about constructing a pattern of how people behave and interact. The fact that it doesn't affect you personally much, at least not directly and/or when it comes down to specific instances, is how they get away with it.

The most recent and famous example I can think of around this is all the stuff about Cambridge Analytica which was treated as a terrible shock but actually was just standard advertising profiling techniques applied to politics, and already used frequently in the States. This information gives far greater power to those who are in a position to pay for and exploit it.

If data are being gathered on your interactions they are being gathered relating to you plus all the other people and the interactions are the point. Facebook talks about the "social graph".
 
Here's a very much not impossible scenario: you have an interest in abortion rights and post various articles and join groups on FB that are related to that. You are connected downstream by a couple of hops, maybe even across networks, to person X in a state that has now banned abortions. With the support of Meta's data the state government runs analyses of who is at a high risk of having an abortion, and their association with you boosts X's rating. This gets pulled into police systems and referred to when they're pulled over, driving fast, trying to leave the state. The cops get a ping from their iPad saying "high abortion flight risk" and arrest them to do blood tests.
 
Back
Top Bottom