Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Brexit actually going to happen?

Will we have a brexit?


  • Total voters
    362
Around 50% of veg and 90% (not a typo) of fruit is non-domestic. (A large part is Spanish, they have a proper food industry because of the weather.)

So at this stage there will not be enough food.

Why are you worrying about this?

Are you not in Scotland? :hmm:
 
Stuart Campbell and Tommy Sheridan.
a971050ab98823c8bf418ddb0db6f5c0.jpg
 
The apple thing is stupid. I dispise Farage but all he was commenting about there, was about the variety of fruit and vege we've lost due to supermarket buying practises. He was talking to a caller who brought this up. The caller talking about his forebares who grew several different local apple species but couldn't sell them to the supermarkets because uniformity is what's demanded.

I remember reading something out out by Freedom Press making exactly the same point...
 
There’s a guy on here who lives in Surrey, driving an Audi, saying that the German car companies will stop any bad Brexit deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
The apple thing is stupid. I dispise Farage but all he was commenting about there, was about the variety of fruit and vege we've lost due to supermarket buying practises. He was talking to a caller who brought this up. The caller talking about his forebares who grew several different local apple species but couldn't sell them to the supermarkets because uniformity is what's demanded.

The phrase “but all he was commenting about” seems to be excusing the idiocy of his comments on this, but surely the point is that said supermarkets’ demands are absolutely nothing to do with the EU? Ie he uses absolutely any opportunity to lie and blame anything seen as bad on the EU. He is a cunt, a liar, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
There’s a guy on here who lives in Surrey, driving an Audi, saying that the German car companies will stop any bad Brexit deal.
OK here's your opportunity to make a political point. What does a "bad Brexit deal" look like? As opposed to a "good" one. How are these terms defined?
 
There’s a guy on here who lives in Surrey, driving an Audi, saying that the German car companies will stop any bad Brexit deal.
There's a guy on here who posted something along the lines of 'if troops are put on the street they'll go back to their working class roots and overthrow the state'.
 
I think people who bandy around terms like ‘bad deal’ and ‘good deal’ need to state what they mean by that. Shouldn’t be too much to ask.
That's as may be. But I think that if you're going to reject a view because it doesn't sufficiently define good or bad thresholds, you should be able to do the same.

It's not like it doesn't exist. There's presumably some outcome scenario where you would have to admit it'd been a net negative on your chosen terms, and thus a bad deal. One poster on here has it approximately defined in availability of calories per day. I think that's much more bleak than I'd draw the line at, but it's a start.

You can certainly label the whole thing 'not my circus, not my monkeys', but if you (a general you) are going to even attempt to integrate a position on Brexit into a political outlook that's predominantly concerned with the welfare of others, you should probably have an idea of what set of effects on that welfare makes it acceptable or not. The lack of definition on that is one of the things that pisses me off the most about U75 discussion of Brexit as a positive or neutral.
 
Last edited:
That's as may be. But I think that if you're going to reject a view because it doesn't sufficiently define good or bad thresholds, you should be able to do the same.

It's not like it doesn't exist. There's presumably some outcome scenario where you would have to admit it'd been a net negative on your chosen terms, and thus a bad deal. One poster on here has it approximately defined in availability of calories per day. I think that's much more bleak than I'd draw the line at, but it's a start.

You can certainly label the whole thing 'not my circus, not my monkeys', but if you (a general you) are going to even attempt to integrate a position on Brexit into a political outlook that's predominantly concerned with the welfare of others, you should probably have an idea of what set of effects on that welfare makes it acceptable or not. The lack of that is one of the things that pisses me off the most about U75 discussion of Brexit as a positive or neutral.

It seems that perhaps the timeline is being lost in this;

A pig-fucking PM called it.

The masses voted the way that the establishment hadn’t expected, to the extent that they had done zero preparation for the prospect.

The EU went through all the stages of grief.

The Greeks outlined in detail why we would not get any meaningful deal.

Nearly three years on and we are entering the denouement and there is still no prospect of any deal, cos there really can’t be one.

March 29th will come and go, either May will have capitulated and not actually left the EU or we will
leave with no deal.

Regardless, the sky will not fall in.
 
Oh the timeline's fine except for what happens if we leave with no deal, which IMO is highly unpredictable in both its likelihood & the outcome of it.

I have consistently said that I think we will leave with no deal. Which of course is unpredictable, but as paolo’s snide digs fail to note, the world will keep turning. Audi will keep delivering parts, The City will keep doing whatever the fuck it is that it does. This is the UK, global home to neo-lib economics and its spawn, the EU. For those whose main concern is ‘the economy’, they are demonstrating a woeful lack of understanding as to how capital operates.
 
Last edited:
But sky falling in really means things like job losses, loss of FOM, opening NHS to further competition, more expensive goods. A brolly wouldn't help with those kind of problems.
Are you suggesting the EU has been buffering the drive to privatise the NHS like?
 
Back
Top Bottom